咀嚼口香糖与美国成年人更好的饮食质量有关,但与口腔健康指标无关。

IF 6.8 4区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the American Nutrition Association Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1080/27697061.2023.2300441
Yang Lu, Xichen Wang, Taylor C Wallace
{"title":"咀嚼口香糖与美国成年人更好的饮食质量有关,但与口腔健康指标无关。","authors":"Yang Lu, Xichen Wang, Taylor C Wallace","doi":"10.1080/27697061.2023.2300441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chewing gum (especially sugar-free gum) has been linked to improved oral health, however there is an absence of observational research using nationally-representative data in the United States. We sought to examine the factors associated with chewing gum and its relationship with the oral health status of U.S. adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2018 cycles were used in these analyses. Primary outcomes were the odds of having gum disease, treatment for gum disease, ever being told of bone loss around teeth, root caries, caries, and restoration. Unadjusted and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship of chewing gum use with demographic/lifestyle factors and the oral health status of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2.40% (<i>n</i> = 365) of adults were users of chewing gum and the average among users was 5.20 ± 0.40 g/d. Users of chewing gum were more likely to be female, younger in age, and non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic. Self-reported chewing gum use did not affect the oral health status of U.S. adults (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.42-2.88 for gum disease; OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.64-2.81 for treatment for gum disease; OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27-1.17 for bone loss around teeth; OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.32-3.12 for root caries; OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.54-1.69 for caries), except for restoration (OR: 3.54, 95% CI: 1.78-7.06), but was associated with improved diet quality (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.12 for a healthy eating index (HEI) of 51-59; OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.08-3.56 for HEI of 60-93); and decreased intakes of snacks (OR: 1.64, 1.01-2.69), and added sugars.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future observational studies that more accurately capture chewing gum usage are needed, as these analyses have several limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":29768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chewing Gum Is Associated with Better Diet Quality but Not Oral Health Measures in U.S. Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Lu, Xichen Wang, Taylor C Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/27697061.2023.2300441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chewing gum (especially sugar-free gum) has been linked to improved oral health, however there is an absence of observational research using nationally-representative data in the United States. We sought to examine the factors associated with chewing gum and its relationship with the oral health status of U.S. adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2018 cycles were used in these analyses. Primary outcomes were the odds of having gum disease, treatment for gum disease, ever being told of bone loss around teeth, root caries, caries, and restoration. Unadjusted and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship of chewing gum use with demographic/lifestyle factors and the oral health status of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2.40% (<i>n</i> = 365) of adults were users of chewing gum and the average among users was 5.20 ± 0.40 g/d. Users of chewing gum were more likely to be female, younger in age, and non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic. Self-reported chewing gum use did not affect the oral health status of U.S. adults (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.42-2.88 for gum disease; OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.64-2.81 for treatment for gum disease; OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27-1.17 for bone loss around teeth; OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.32-3.12 for root caries; OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.54-1.69 for caries), except for restoration (OR: 3.54, 95% CI: 1.78-7.06), but was associated with improved diet quality (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.12 for a healthy eating index (HEI) of 51-59; OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.08-3.56 for HEI of 60-93); and decreased intakes of snacks (OR: 1.64, 1.01-2.69), and added sugars.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future observational studies that more accurately capture chewing gum usage are needed, as these analyses have several limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Nutrition Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Nutrition Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2023.2300441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2023.2300441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:咀嚼口香糖(尤其是无糖口香糖)与改善口腔健康有关,但在美国缺乏使用全国代表性数据的观察研究。我们试图研究咀嚼口香糖的相关因素及其与美国成年人口腔健康状况的关系:这些分析采用了美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)2013-2018 年周期的横截面数据。主要结果是患有牙龈疾病、接受过牙龈疾病治疗、曾被告知牙齿周围骨质流失、牙根龋、龋齿和修复的几率。使用未调整和多变量逻辑回归模型来研究口香糖的使用与人口统计学/生活方式因素和参与者口腔健康状况之间的关系。结果:2.40%(n = 365)的成年人使用口香糖,使用者的平均使用量为 5.20 ± 0.40 克/天。口香糖使用者多为女性、年轻、非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔。自我报告的口香糖使用情况并不影响美国成年人的口腔健康状况(牙龈疾病 OR:1.10,95% CI:0.42-2.88;牙龈疾病治疗 OR:1.34,95% CI:0.64-2.81;牙齿周围骨质流失 OR:0.56,95% CI:0.27-1.17;牙根龋 OR:1.01,95% CI:0.32-3.12;龋齿 OR:0.96,95% CI:0.54-1.69)。除修复外(OR:3.54,95% CI:1.78-7.06),龋齿的OR:0.96,95% CI:0.54-1.69),但与饮食质量的改善有关(健康饮食指数(HEI)为51-59时,OR:1.86,95% CI:1.11-3.12;健康饮食指数为60-93时,OR:1.96,95% CI:1.08-3.56);零食(OR:1.64,1.01-2.69)和添加糖的摄入量减少:结论:由于这些分析存在一些局限性,今后需要开展更准确地捕捉口香糖使用情况的观察研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chewing Gum Is Associated with Better Diet Quality but Not Oral Health Measures in U.S. Adults.

Objective: Chewing gum (especially sugar-free gum) has been linked to improved oral health, however there is an absence of observational research using nationally-representative data in the United States. We sought to examine the factors associated with chewing gum and its relationship with the oral health status of U.S. adults.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2018 cycles were used in these analyses. Primary outcomes were the odds of having gum disease, treatment for gum disease, ever being told of bone loss around teeth, root caries, caries, and restoration. Unadjusted and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship of chewing gum use with demographic/lifestyle factors and the oral health status of participants.

Results: 2.40% (n = 365) of adults were users of chewing gum and the average among users was 5.20 ± 0.40 g/d. Users of chewing gum were more likely to be female, younger in age, and non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic. Self-reported chewing gum use did not affect the oral health status of U.S. adults (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.42-2.88 for gum disease; OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.64-2.81 for treatment for gum disease; OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27-1.17 for bone loss around teeth; OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.32-3.12 for root caries; OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.54-1.69 for caries), except for restoration (OR: 3.54, 95% CI: 1.78-7.06), but was associated with improved diet quality (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.12 for a healthy eating index (HEI) of 51-59; OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.08-3.56 for HEI of 60-93); and decreased intakes of snacks (OR: 1.64, 1.01-2.69), and added sugars.

Conclusion: Future observational studies that more accurately capture chewing gum usage are needed, as these analyses have several limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Meal Frequency on Body Composition, Biochemical Parameters and Diet Quality in Overweight/Obese Individuals. Associations between Vitamin D Levels and Insulin Resistance in Non-Diabetic Obesity: Results from NHANES 2001-2018. Effect of Pleurotus ostreatus Water Extract Consumption on Blood Parameters and Cytokine Values in Healthy Volunteers. Effects of Acute Ingestion of Guarana (Paullinia Cupana) on Soccer Player Performance: A Randomized, Cross-over, Placebo-Controlled Study. The Role of Exercise: Physical Fitness Changes Caused by Hypocaloric Diet and Exercise in Men Who Are Overweight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1