成人特应性皮炎的靶向系统疗法:从生物制剂和 JAK 抑制剂中进行选择。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s40257-023-00837-w
Richard W. Kim, Megan Lam, Katrina Abuabara, Eric L. Simpson, Aaron M. Drucker
{"title":"成人特应性皮炎的靶向系统疗法:从生物制剂和 JAK 抑制剂中进行选择。","authors":"Richard W. Kim,&nbsp;Megan Lam,&nbsp;Katrina Abuabara,&nbsp;Eric L. Simpson,&nbsp;Aaron M. Drucker","doi":"10.1007/s40257-023-00837-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents—biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors—have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Richard W. Kim,&nbsp;Megan Lam,&nbsp;Katrina Abuabara,&nbsp;Eric L. Simpson,&nbsp;Aaron M. Drucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40257-023-00837-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents—biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors—have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-023-00837-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-023-00837-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,局部治疗难治的中度或重度特应性皮炎患者的治疗选择迅速增加。在大多数安慰剂对照的特应性皮炎临床试验中,这些新的靶向免疫调节药物--生物制剂和 Janus 激酶 (JAK) 抑制剂--都表现出了很高的疗效和可接受的安全性,但目前还没有一种普遍适用的算法来帮助特定患者在这两种药物之间做出选择。因此,患者和医生应共同决策,讨论疗效、安全性、给药方式、监测、成本、起效速度和其他因素,以做出个性化的治疗决定。在这篇综述中,我们总结了生物制剂和口服 JAK 抑制剂对成人特应性皮炎患者的疗效、安全性和监测,试图帮助患者共同决策。网络荟萃分析表明,高剂量的阿罗西替尼和乌达替尼比生物制剂更有效。荟萃分析还显示,在生物制剂中,dupilumab可能比tralokinumab和lebrikizumab更有效。生物制剂通常被认为比JAK抑制剂更安全,尽管人们对JAK抑制剂的担忧主要是从在高风险人群中使用的老一代JAK抑制剂推断出来的。我们还概述了为特殊人群(包括孕妇、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者、乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎患者、终末期肾病患者和老年人)选择和使用全身免疫调节疗法的证据和注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents—biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors—have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Superficial Actinic Porokeratosis: A Systematic Treatment Review. Patient-Reported Hair Loss and Its Impacts as Measured by the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Instrument in Patients Treated with Ritlecitinib: The ALLEGRO Phase 2b/3 Randomized Clinical Trial. From Compression to Itch: Exploring the Link Between Nerve Compression and Neuropathic Pruritus. Authors’ Reply to Wang et al., “Comment on ‘Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab, an Anti‑interleukin‑17 Receptor A Monoclonal Antibody, for Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 16‑Week Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial’” Comment on “Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab, an Anti‑interleukin‑17 Receptor A Monoclonal Antibody, for Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 16‑Week Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1