癌症治疗患者对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的反应:对SARS-CoV-2免疫人群的分析

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14047
George Cavic, Andrew A. Almonte, Sarah M. Hicks, Teresa Neeman, Jo-Wai Wang, Sue Brew, Philip Y. Choi, Ian Cockburn, Elizabeth E. Gardiner, Desmond Yip, Aude M. Fahrer, Yada Kanjanapan
{"title":"癌症治疗患者对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的反应:对SARS-CoV-2免疫人群的分析","authors":"George Cavic,&nbsp;Andrew A. Almonte,&nbsp;Sarah M. Hicks,&nbsp;Teresa Neeman,&nbsp;Jo-Wai Wang,&nbsp;Sue Brew,&nbsp;Philip Y. Choi,&nbsp;Ian Cockburn,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Gardiner,&nbsp;Desmond Yip,&nbsp;Aude M. Fahrer,&nbsp;Yada Kanjanapan","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer patients have increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, but may respond poorly to vaccination. The Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination Efficacy and Rare Events in Solid Tumors (EVEREST) study, comparing seropositivity between cancer patients and healthy controls in a low SARS-CoV-2 community-transmission setting, allows determination of vaccine response with minimal interference from infection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Solid tumor patients from The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia, and healthy controls who received COVID-19 vaccination between March 2021 and January 2022 were included. Blood samples were collected at baseline, pre-second vaccine dose and at 1, 3 (primary endpoint), and 6 months post-second dose. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike-RBD (S-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-six solid tumor patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled, with median age 62 years, and 60% were female. Participants received either AZD1222 (65%) or BNT162b2 (35%) COVID-19 vaccines. Seropositivity 3 months post vaccination was 87% (76/87) in patients and 100% (20/20) in controls (<i>p</i> = .12). Seropositivity was observed in 84% of patients on chemotherapy, 80% on immunotherapy, and 96% on targeted therapy (differences not satistically significant). Seropositivity in cancer patients increased from 40% (6/15) after first dose, to 95% (35/37) 1 month after second dose, then dropped to 87% (76/87) 3 months after second dose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Most patients and all controls became seropositive after two vaccine doses. Antibody concentrations and seropositivity showed a decrease between 1 and 3 months post vaccination, highlighting need for booster vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 infection amplifies S-RBD antibody responses; however, cannot be adequately identified using nucleocapsid serology. This underlines the value of our COVID-naïve population in studying vaccine immunogenicity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients on cancer therapy: Analysis in a SARS-CoV-2-naïve population\",\"authors\":\"George Cavic,&nbsp;Andrew A. Almonte,&nbsp;Sarah M. Hicks,&nbsp;Teresa Neeman,&nbsp;Jo-Wai Wang,&nbsp;Sue Brew,&nbsp;Philip Y. Choi,&nbsp;Ian Cockburn,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Gardiner,&nbsp;Desmond Yip,&nbsp;Aude M. Fahrer,&nbsp;Yada Kanjanapan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cancer patients have increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, but may respond poorly to vaccination. The Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination Efficacy and Rare Events in Solid Tumors (EVEREST) study, comparing seropositivity between cancer patients and healthy controls in a low SARS-CoV-2 community-transmission setting, allows determination of vaccine response with minimal interference from infection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Solid tumor patients from The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia, and healthy controls who received COVID-19 vaccination between March 2021 and January 2022 were included. Blood samples were collected at baseline, pre-second vaccine dose and at 1, 3 (primary endpoint), and 6 months post-second dose. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike-RBD (S-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were measured.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety-six solid tumor patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled, with median age 62 years, and 60% were female. Participants received either AZD1222 (65%) or BNT162b2 (35%) COVID-19 vaccines. Seropositivity 3 months post vaccination was 87% (76/87) in patients and 100% (20/20) in controls (<i>p</i> = .12). Seropositivity was observed in 84% of patients on chemotherapy, 80% on immunotherapy, and 96% on targeted therapy (differences not satistically significant). Seropositivity in cancer patients increased from 40% (6/15) after first dose, to 95% (35/37) 1 month after second dose, then dropped to 87% (76/87) 3 months after second dose.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most patients and all controls became seropositive after two vaccine doses. Antibody concentrations and seropositivity showed a decrease between 1 and 3 months post vaccination, highlighting need for booster vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 infection amplifies S-RBD antibody responses; however, cannot be adequately identified using nucleocapsid serology. This underlines the value of our COVID-naïve population in studying vaccine immunogenicity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症患者因 COVID-19 而增加发病率和死亡率,但可能对疫苗接种反应不佳。COVID-19疫苗接种效果和实体瘤罕见事件评估(EVEREST)研究比较了在SARS-CoV-2社区低传播环境中癌症患者和健康对照组之间的血清阳性率,从而可以在感染干扰最小的情况下确定疫苗反应:方法:纳入澳大利亚堪培拉堪培拉医院的实体瘤患者和在 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接种 COVID-19 疫苗的健康对照者。在基线、接种第二剂疫苗前、接种第二剂疫苗后的1个月、3个月(主要终点)和6个月采集血液样本。测定了 SARS-CoV-2 抗尖头-RBD(S-RBD)和抗核头 IgG 抗体:共招募了 96 名实体瘤患者和 20 名健康对照者,中位年龄为 62 岁,60% 为女性。参与者接种了AZD1222(65%)或BNT162b2(35%)COVID-19疫苗。接种后 3 个月,患者血清阳性率为 87%(76/87),对照组为 100% (20/20)(p = .12)。接受化疗的患者血清阳性率为 84%,接受免疫疗法的患者为 80%,接受靶向疗法的患者为 96%(差异无统计学意义)。癌症患者的血清阳性率从第一次用药后的40%(6/15)上升到第二次用药后1个月的95%(35/37),然后又下降到第二次用药后3个月的87%(76/87):结论:大多数患者和所有对照组在接种两剂疫苗后血清反应呈阳性。抗体浓度和血清阳性率在接种后 1 个月至 3 个月期间有所下降,这表明有必要加强接种。SARS-CoV-2 感染会增强 S-RBD 抗体反应,但核壳血清学无法充分识别。这凸显了我们的 COVID 未感染人群在研究疫苗免疫原性方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients on cancer therapy: Analysis in a SARS-CoV-2-naïve population

Background

Cancer patients have increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, but may respond poorly to vaccination. The Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination Efficacy and Rare Events in Solid Tumors (EVEREST) study, comparing seropositivity between cancer patients and healthy controls in a low SARS-CoV-2 community-transmission setting, allows determination of vaccine response with minimal interference from infection.

Methods

Solid tumor patients from The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia, and healthy controls who received COVID-19 vaccination between March 2021 and January 2022 were included. Blood samples were collected at baseline, pre-second vaccine dose and at 1, 3 (primary endpoint), and 6 months post-second dose. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike-RBD (S-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were measured.

Results

Ninety-six solid tumor patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled, with median age 62 years, and 60% were female. Participants received either AZD1222 (65%) or BNT162b2 (35%) COVID-19 vaccines. Seropositivity 3 months post vaccination was 87% (76/87) in patients and 100% (20/20) in controls (p = .12). Seropositivity was observed in 84% of patients on chemotherapy, 80% on immunotherapy, and 96% on targeted therapy (differences not satistically significant). Seropositivity in cancer patients increased from 40% (6/15) after first dose, to 95% (35/37) 1 month after second dose, then dropped to 87% (76/87) 3 months after second dose.

Conclusion

Most patients and all controls became seropositive after two vaccine doses. Antibody concentrations and seropositivity showed a decrease between 1 and 3 months post vaccination, highlighting need for booster vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 infection amplifies S-RBD antibody responses; however, cannot be adequately identified using nucleocapsid serology. This underlines the value of our COVID-naïve population in studying vaccine immunogenicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Cancer Clinical Trial Participation Amongst Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Patients in Australia. Issue Information COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024. COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024. COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1