{"title":"大气卤化温室气体气相色谱测量方法回顾。","authors":"Noh Soo Han, Jeong Sik Lim","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2024.2302576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gas chromatography (GC) is crucial for measuring atmospheric halogenated greenhouse gases (hGHGs), usually coupled with electron capture detector (ECD, with higher sensitivity) or mass spectrometry (MS, with higher selectivity). This review compares GC-ECD and GC-MS for analyzing atmospheric hGHGs in terms of analytical methodology, performance, and instrumentation. For hGHGs such as SF<sub>6</sub>, chlorofluorocarbons, and N<sub>2</sub>O, ECD can be employed in the single column, forecut-backflush (FCBF), and preconcentration methods. The order of appearance of SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O is an important consideration for selecting the separation column to avoid chromatographic interference from the long-tailed N<sub>2</sub>O and O<sub>2</sub> on SF<sub>6</sub>. Single column and FCBF GC-ECD methods suffer from nonlinear responsivity, but the preconcentration method can compensate for nonlinearity. The last method also offers a low drift, which eliminates the need for multipoint calibration and enables perfect linearity at atmospheric SF<sub>6</sub> levels. GC-MS demonstrates strong separability and identification capabilities, and over 60 hGHGs can be qualitatively analyzed by leveraging the separation power of MS and established MS databases. However, GC-MS requires a preconcentrator operating at -165 °C utilizing specialized adsorbents. Two notable preconcentrator-GC-MS systems, Medusa-GC-MS and detachable trap preconcentrator (DTP) GC-MS, differ in trap design, temperature scheme, and separation column type. Medusa-GC-MS employs a three-phased temperature operation before MS. DTP-GC-MS separates the preconcentration cycle into highly and less volatile compounds, using a different temperature scheme from that of Medusa-GC-MS. The preconcentrator-GC-MS system is widely employed for measuring perfluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, and other hGHGs. This method necessitates multiple adsorption traps to discriminate the most abundant air components.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Gas-Chromatographic Measurement Methodologies for Atmospheric Halogenated Greenhouse Gases.\",\"authors\":\"Noh Soo Han, Jeong Sik Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408347.2024.2302576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gas chromatography (GC) is crucial for measuring atmospheric halogenated greenhouse gases (hGHGs), usually coupled with electron capture detector (ECD, with higher sensitivity) or mass spectrometry (MS, with higher selectivity). This review compares GC-ECD and GC-MS for analyzing atmospheric hGHGs in terms of analytical methodology, performance, and instrumentation. For hGHGs such as SF<sub>6</sub>, chlorofluorocarbons, and N<sub>2</sub>O, ECD can be employed in the single column, forecut-backflush (FCBF), and preconcentration methods. The order of appearance of SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O is an important consideration for selecting the separation column to avoid chromatographic interference from the long-tailed N<sub>2</sub>O and O<sub>2</sub> on SF<sub>6</sub>. Single column and FCBF GC-ECD methods suffer from nonlinear responsivity, but the preconcentration method can compensate for nonlinearity. The last method also offers a low drift, which eliminates the need for multipoint calibration and enables perfect linearity at atmospheric SF<sub>6</sub> levels. GC-MS demonstrates strong separability and identification capabilities, and over 60 hGHGs can be qualitatively analyzed by leveraging the separation power of MS and established MS databases. However, GC-MS requires a preconcentrator operating at -165 °C utilizing specialized adsorbents. Two notable preconcentrator-GC-MS systems, Medusa-GC-MS and detachable trap preconcentrator (DTP) GC-MS, differ in trap design, temperature scheme, and separation column type. Medusa-GC-MS employs a three-phased temperature operation before MS. DTP-GC-MS separates the preconcentration cycle into highly and less volatile compounds, using a different temperature scheme from that of Medusa-GC-MS. The preconcentrator-GC-MS system is widely employed for measuring perfluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, and other hGHGs. This method necessitates multiple adsorption traps to discriminate the most abundant air components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2024.2302576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2024.2302576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of Gas-Chromatographic Measurement Methodologies for Atmospheric Halogenated Greenhouse Gases.
Gas chromatography (GC) is crucial for measuring atmospheric halogenated greenhouse gases (hGHGs), usually coupled with electron capture detector (ECD, with higher sensitivity) or mass spectrometry (MS, with higher selectivity). This review compares GC-ECD and GC-MS for analyzing atmospheric hGHGs in terms of analytical methodology, performance, and instrumentation. For hGHGs such as SF6, chlorofluorocarbons, and N2O, ECD can be employed in the single column, forecut-backflush (FCBF), and preconcentration methods. The order of appearance of SF6 and N2O is an important consideration for selecting the separation column to avoid chromatographic interference from the long-tailed N2O and O2 on SF6. Single column and FCBF GC-ECD methods suffer from nonlinear responsivity, but the preconcentration method can compensate for nonlinearity. The last method also offers a low drift, which eliminates the need for multipoint calibration and enables perfect linearity at atmospheric SF6 levels. GC-MS demonstrates strong separability and identification capabilities, and over 60 hGHGs can be qualitatively analyzed by leveraging the separation power of MS and established MS databases. However, GC-MS requires a preconcentrator operating at -165 °C utilizing specialized adsorbents. Two notable preconcentrator-GC-MS systems, Medusa-GC-MS and detachable trap preconcentrator (DTP) GC-MS, differ in trap design, temperature scheme, and separation column type. Medusa-GC-MS employs a three-phased temperature operation before MS. DTP-GC-MS separates the preconcentration cycle into highly and less volatile compounds, using a different temperature scheme from that of Medusa-GC-MS. The preconcentrator-GC-MS system is widely employed for measuring perfluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, and other hGHGs. This method necessitates multiple adsorption traps to discriminate the most abundant air components.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area.
This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following:
· chemical analysis;
· instrumentation;
· chemometrics;
· analytical biochemistry;
· medicinal analysis;
· forensics;
· environmental sciences;
· applied physics;
· and material science.