{"title":"分离前的程序很重要--河流微生物组分析中 DNA 分离前不同过滤方法的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A common method of preparing water samples for environmental DNA isolation is to vacuum filter the water sample through membrane filters. The aim of research was to test the performance of five methods of preparing river water samples for DNA isolation. DNA was isolated using a commercial kit and next-generation sequencing was performed on an Illumina Miseq platform. <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was the dominant bacterial genus in all samples. However, its relative abundance varied between samples. Depending on the volume of water filtered, the eluates yielded 62–63 % (<em>V</em> = 100 mL), 59–63.9 % (<em>V</em> = 50 mL), 17.8–19.4 % (<em>V</em> = 500 mL) of the relative abundance of <em>Pseudomonas</em> sp. In contrast, DNA isolation from the membrane filter (<em>V</em> = 100 mL) yielded 38 % and from the sediment after centrifugation 27 %. Differences were observed for all taxa obtained. The results indicate that even the sample volume used for filtration influences the results obtained from next-generation sequencing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 486-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-isolation procedures matter–Comparison of different filtration methods prior to DNA isolation in river microbiome analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A common method of preparing water samples for environmental DNA isolation is to vacuum filter the water sample through membrane filters. The aim of research was to test the performance of five methods of preparing river water samples for DNA isolation. DNA was isolated using a commercial kit and next-generation sequencing was performed on an Illumina Miseq platform. <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was the dominant bacterial genus in all samples. However, its relative abundance varied between samples. Depending on the volume of water filtered, the eluates yielded 62–63 % (<em>V</em> = 100 mL), 59–63.9 % (<em>V</em> = 50 mL), 17.8–19.4 % (<em>V</em> = 500 mL) of the relative abundance of <em>Pseudomonas</em> sp. In contrast, DNA isolation from the membrane filter (<em>V</em> = 100 mL) yielded 38 % and from the sediment after centrifugation 27 %. Differences were observed for all taxa obtained. The results indicate that even the sample volume used for filtration influences the results obtained from next-generation sequencing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 486-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359323001477\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359323001477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
制备用于环境 DNA 分离的水样的常用方法是通过膜过滤器对水样进行真空过滤。研究的目的是测试五种河水样本DNA分离制备方法的性能。使用商业试剂盒分离 DNA,并在 Illumina Miseq 平台上进行下一代测序。假单胞菌属是所有样本中的主要细菌属。不过,其相对丰度在不同样本中有所不同。根据过滤水量的不同,洗脱液中假单胞菌的相对丰度分别为 62-63%(V = 100 mL)、59-63.9%(V = 50 mL)、17.8-19.4%(V = 500 mL)。 相反,从膜滤器(V = 100 mL)中分离出的 DNA 含量为 38%,从离心后的沉淀物中分离出的 DNA 含量为 27%。所获得的所有分类群都存在差异。结果表明,即使是过滤所用的样本容量也会影响新一代测序的结果。
Pre-isolation procedures matter–Comparison of different filtration methods prior to DNA isolation in river microbiome analysis
A common method of preparing water samples for environmental DNA isolation is to vacuum filter the water sample through membrane filters. The aim of research was to test the performance of five methods of preparing river water samples for DNA isolation. DNA was isolated using a commercial kit and next-generation sequencing was performed on an Illumina Miseq platform. Pseudomonas spp. was the dominant bacterial genus in all samples. However, its relative abundance varied between samples. Depending on the volume of water filtered, the eluates yielded 62–63 % (V = 100 mL), 59–63.9 % (V = 50 mL), 17.8–19.4 % (V = 500 mL) of the relative abundance of Pseudomonas sp. In contrast, DNA isolation from the membrane filter (V = 100 mL) yielded 38 % and from the sediment after centrifugation 27 %. Differences were observed for all taxa obtained. The results indicate that even the sample volume used for filtration influences the results obtained from next-generation sequencing.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.