分析复杂供应链中新型昆虫蛋白新出现的食品安全和欺诈风险

IF 6.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY NPJ Science of Food Pub Date : 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1038/s41538-023-00241-y
A. Traynor, D. Thorburn Burns, D. Wu, N. Karoonuthaisiri, A. Petchkongkaew, C. T. Elliott
{"title":"分析复杂供应链中新型昆虫蛋白新出现的食品安全和欺诈风险","authors":"A. Traynor, D. Thorburn Burns, D. Wu, N. Karoonuthaisiri, A. Petchkongkaew, C. T. Elliott","doi":"10.1038/s41538-023-00241-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food consumption play a crucial role in human life, yet conventional food production and consumption patterns can be detrimental to the environment. Thus, research and development has been directed towards alternative proteins, with edible insects being promising sources. Edible insects have been recognised for their sustainable benefits providing protein, with less emission of greenhouse gas, land and water usage compared to sources, such as beef, chicken, and dairy products. Among the over 2000 known edible insect species, only four, namely yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), migratory locust/grasshopper (Locusta migratoria), grain mould beetle, also known as lesser mealworm which is a larval form of Alphitobius diaperinus (from the family of Tenebrionidae of darkling beetles) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus), are currently authorised in specific products through specific producers in the EU. The expansion of such foods into Western diets face challenges such as consumer barriers, gaps in microbiological and chemical safety hazard data during production and processing, and the potential for fraudulent supply chain activity. The main aim of this study was to map the supply chain, through interviews with personnel along the supply chain, coupled with searches for relevant publications and governmental documents. Thus, the main potential points of food safety and fraud along the edible insect supply chain were identified. Feed substrate was identified as the main area of concern regarding microbiological and chemical food safety and novel processing techniques were forecast to be of most concern for future fraudulent activity. Despite the on-going authorisation of insect species in many countries there are substantial food safety and authenticity information gaps in this industry that need to be addressed before edible insects can be viewed as a safe and sustainable protein sources by Western consumers.","PeriodicalId":19367,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Science of Food","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-023-00241-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains\",\"authors\":\"A. Traynor, D. Thorburn Burns, D. Wu, N. Karoonuthaisiri, A. Petchkongkaew, C. T. Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41538-023-00241-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Food consumption play a crucial role in human life, yet conventional food production and consumption patterns can be detrimental to the environment. Thus, research and development has been directed towards alternative proteins, with edible insects being promising sources. Edible insects have been recognised for their sustainable benefits providing protein, with less emission of greenhouse gas, land and water usage compared to sources, such as beef, chicken, and dairy products. Among the over 2000 known edible insect species, only four, namely yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), migratory locust/grasshopper (Locusta migratoria), grain mould beetle, also known as lesser mealworm which is a larval form of Alphitobius diaperinus (from the family of Tenebrionidae of darkling beetles) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus), are currently authorised in specific products through specific producers in the EU. The expansion of such foods into Western diets face challenges such as consumer barriers, gaps in microbiological and chemical safety hazard data during production and processing, and the potential for fraudulent supply chain activity. The main aim of this study was to map the supply chain, through interviews with personnel along the supply chain, coupled with searches for relevant publications and governmental documents. Thus, the main potential points of food safety and fraud along the edible insect supply chain were identified. Feed substrate was identified as the main area of concern regarding microbiological and chemical food safety and novel processing techniques were forecast to be of most concern for future fraudulent activity. Despite the on-going authorisation of insect species in many countries there are substantial food safety and authenticity information gaps in this industry that need to be addressed before edible insects can be viewed as a safe and sustainable protein sources by Western consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Science of Food\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-023-00241-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Science of Food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-023-00241-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Science of Food","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-023-00241-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食品消费在人类生活中发挥着至关重要的作用,然而传统的食品生产和消费模式可能会对环境造成危害。因此,人们开始研究和开发替代蛋白质,其中食用昆虫是很有前景的来源。与牛肉、鸡肉和乳制品等来源相比,食用昆虫提供的蛋白质具有可持续的优势,而且温室气体排放量、土地和水的使用量都较少。在已知的 2000 多种可食用昆虫中,目前只有四种昆虫,即黄粉虫(Tenebrio molitor)、蝗虫/蚱蜢(Locusta migratoria)、谷霉甲虫(也称小黄粉虫,是暗色甲虫科 Alphitobius diaperinus 的幼虫形式)和家蟋蟀(Acheta domesticus),在欧盟通过特定生产商获得了特定产品的授权。将此类食品推广到西方饮食中面临着各种挑战,如消费者障碍、生产和加工过程中微生物和化学安全危害数据的缺口以及供应链欺诈活动的可能性。本研究的主要目的是通过对供应链上的人员进行访谈,并搜索相关出版物和政府文件,绘制供应链地图。因此,确定了食用昆虫供应链上食品安全和欺诈的主要潜在点。饲料基质被确定为微生物和化学食品安全的主要关注领域,而新型加工技术则被预测为未来欺诈活动的最大关注点。尽管许多国家正在对昆虫物种进行授权,但在食用昆虫被西方消费者视为安全和可持续的蛋白质来源之前,该行业在食品安全和真实性信息方面仍存在巨大差距,需要加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains
Food consumption play a crucial role in human life, yet conventional food production and consumption patterns can be detrimental to the environment. Thus, research and development has been directed towards alternative proteins, with edible insects being promising sources. Edible insects have been recognised for their sustainable benefits providing protein, with less emission of greenhouse gas, land and water usage compared to sources, such as beef, chicken, and dairy products. Among the over 2000 known edible insect species, only four, namely yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), migratory locust/grasshopper (Locusta migratoria), grain mould beetle, also known as lesser mealworm which is a larval form of Alphitobius diaperinus (from the family of Tenebrionidae of darkling beetles) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus), are currently authorised in specific products through specific producers in the EU. The expansion of such foods into Western diets face challenges such as consumer barriers, gaps in microbiological and chemical safety hazard data during production and processing, and the potential for fraudulent supply chain activity. The main aim of this study was to map the supply chain, through interviews with personnel along the supply chain, coupled with searches for relevant publications and governmental documents. Thus, the main potential points of food safety and fraud along the edible insect supply chain were identified. Feed substrate was identified as the main area of concern regarding microbiological and chemical food safety and novel processing techniques were forecast to be of most concern for future fraudulent activity. Despite the on-going authorisation of insect species in many countries there are substantial food safety and authenticity information gaps in this industry that need to be addressed before edible insects can be viewed as a safe and sustainable protein sources by Western consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Science of Food
NPJ Science of Food FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: npj Science of Food is an online-only and open access journal publishes high-quality, high-impact papers related to food safety, security, integrated production, processing and packaging, the changes and interactions of food components, and the influence on health and wellness properties of food. The journal will support fundamental studies that advance the science of food beyond the classic focus on processing, thereby addressing basic inquiries around food from the public and industry. It will also support research that might result in innovation of technologies and products that are public-friendly while promoting the United Nations sustainable development goals.
期刊最新文献
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains L7 contribute to flavor and deacidification in Suanyu, a Chinese traditional fermented fish Identification strategy of wild and cultivated Astragali Radix based on REIMS combined with two-dimensional LC-MS High-fiber basil seed flour reduces insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in high-fat diet mice PPM1J regulates meat quality feature and glycerophospholipids composition in broiler by modulating protein dephosphorylation The time has come to reconsider the quantitative sugar guidelines and related policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1