职业诚信对模拟学习成果的影响--系统综述规程

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101508

INACSL Standards Committee, Neena Xavier MD, FACE , Jamie Quinn MSIS, AHIP , Brayton Amidon MSN, RN, CHSE , Roxie Barnes PhD, MSN, RN, CCRN, CHSE , Leigh Dunning MSN, RN, MEDSURG-BC, CHSE

{"title":"职业诚信对模拟学习成果的影响--系统综述规程","authors":"INACSL Standards Committee, Neena Xavier MD, FACE , Jamie Quinn MSIS, AHIP , Brayton Amidon MSN, RN, CHSE , Roxie Barnes PhD, MSN, RN, CCRN, CHSE , Leigh Dunning MSN, RN, MEDSURG-BC, CHSE","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Factors outside of formal didactic sessions during healthcare education can influence students’ learning and achievement of desired learning outcomes. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice<sup>TM</sup> emphasize the importance of maintaining a safe environment in the implementation of simulation-based experiences. However, a current literature gap exists regarding the impact of professional integrity on learning outcomes in the simulation environment.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This systematic review protocol outlines the identification, critical appraisal, and synthesis of the best available evidence to describe professional integrity in the simulation environment and its impact upon healthcare learners’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An interprofessional committee of simulation educators will perform a systematic review under the guidance of a health science librarian using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Peer-reviewed literature will be searched across six databases. Abstracts deemed relevant in meeting the inclusion criteria will undergo full-text review.</p></div><div><h3>Expected Results</h3><p>The systematic review will inform evidence-based practices related to professional integrity criteria to support the delivery of high-quality simulation that promote a culture of inclusion, trust, and safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Professional Integrity on Simulation Learning Outcomes –A Systematic Review Protocol\",\"authors\":\"INACSL Standards Committee, Neena Xavier MD, FACE , Jamie Quinn MSIS, AHIP , Brayton Amidon MSN, RN, CHSE , Roxie Barnes PhD, MSN, RN, CCRN, CHSE , Leigh Dunning MSN, RN, MEDSURG-BC, CHSE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Factors outside of formal didactic sessions during healthcare education can influence students’ learning and achievement of desired learning outcomes. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice<sup>TM</sup> emphasize the importance of maintaining a safe environment in the implementation of simulation-based experiences. However, a current literature gap exists regarding the impact of professional integrity on learning outcomes in the simulation environment.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This systematic review protocol outlines the identification, critical appraisal, and synthesis of the best available evidence to describe professional integrity in the simulation environment and its impact upon healthcare learners’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An interprofessional committee of simulation educators will perform a systematic review under the guidance of a health science librarian using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Peer-reviewed literature will be searched across six databases. Abstracts deemed relevant in meeting the inclusion criteria will undergo full-text review.</p></div><div><h3>Expected Results</h3><p>The systematic review will inform evidence-based practices related to professional integrity criteria to support the delivery of high-quality simulation that promote a culture of inclusion, trust, and safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139923001226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139923001226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在医疗保健教育过程中，正式授课之外的因素会影响学生的学习和预期学习成果的实现。医疗保健模拟最佳实践标准》（Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM）强调了在实施模拟体验时保持安全环境的重要性。本系统综述方案概述了对现有最佳证据的识别、批判性评估和综合，以描述模拟环境中的职业诚信及其对医疗保健学习者的知识、技能、态度和行为的影响。方法模拟教育工作者组成的跨专业委员会将在健康科学图书馆员的指导下，采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的方法进行系统综述。将在六个数据库中搜索同行评审过的文献。预期结果该系统综述将为与职业诚信标准相关的循证实践提供信息，以支持提供高质量的模拟教学，促进包容、信任和安全的文化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Impact of Professional Integrity on Simulation Learning Outcomes –A Systematic Review Protocol

Background

Factors outside of formal didactic sessions during healthcare education can influence students’ learning and achievement of desired learning outcomes. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice^TM emphasize the importance of maintaining a safe environment in the implementation of simulation-based experiences. However, a current literature gap exists regarding the impact of professional integrity on learning outcomes in the simulation environment.

Aim

This systematic review protocol outlines the identification, critical appraisal, and synthesis of the best available evidence to describe professional integrity in the simulation environment and its impact upon healthcare learners’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors.

Methods

An interprofessional committee of simulation educators will perform a systematic review under the guidance of a health science librarian using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Peer-reviewed literature will be searched across six databases. Abstracts deemed relevant in meeting the inclusion criteria will undergo full-text review.

Expected Results

The systematic review will inform evidence-based practices related to professional integrity criteria to support the delivery of high-quality simulation that promote a culture of inclusion, trust, and safety.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.