对步行的特定建筑环境因素重要性的认识:确定促进步行政策措施优先次序的新视角

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1080/15568318.2023.2301372
Caroline Koszowski , Rico Wittwer , Stefan Hubrich , Regine Gerike
{"title":"对步行的特定建筑环境因素重要性的认识:确定促进步行政策措施优先次序的新视角","authors":"Caroline Koszowski ,&nbsp;Rico Wittwer ,&nbsp;Stefan Hubrich ,&nbsp;Regine Gerike","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2023.2301372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Walking as one type of physical activity generates benefits for personal health and contributes to sustainability in its environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Based on a cross-sectional survey for a representative sample of German cities with at least 100,000 residents, this study investigates determinants of residents’ walking behavior. Two contexts of promenading in the city for leisure walking and the trip to the supermarket for utilitarian walking are distinguished in order to investigate differences in respondents’ perceived importance of built-environment characteristics and to bridge the gap between the individual level of residents’ behavior and the streetscape level. In addition, the analyses distinguish between frequent and less frequent walkers in order to understand differences in characteristics, behavior, preferences, and perceptions between these two groups. The results of this study with a sample of <em>n</em> = 4,637 respondents show that the relevance of the built environment is higher for leisure walking than for utilitarian walking and higher for frequent walkers compared to less frequent walkers. For leisure walking, “protection”-variables are ranked high (e.g. safety, security), followed by “comfort” (e.g. space, surface quality) and by “delight” (e.g. attractive buildings, greenery). Distance is key for utilitarian walking. Significant differences between frequent and less frequent walkers are identified mainly for the “Delight”-variables, this is attractive buildings and greenery for utilitarian walking, and space availability and street furniture for leisure walking. These differences should be considered in future research and street design practice which might preferably focus on the most demanding person group of frequent walkers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived importance of context-specific built-environment factors of walking: A new perspective for prioritizing policy measures for promoting walking\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Koszowski ,&nbsp;Rico Wittwer ,&nbsp;Stefan Hubrich ,&nbsp;Regine Gerike\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15568318.2023.2301372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Walking as one type of physical activity generates benefits for personal health and contributes to sustainability in its environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Based on a cross-sectional survey for a representative sample of German cities with at least 100,000 residents, this study investigates determinants of residents’ walking behavior. Two contexts of promenading in the city for leisure walking and the trip to the supermarket for utilitarian walking are distinguished in order to investigate differences in respondents’ perceived importance of built-environment characteristics and to bridge the gap between the individual level of residents’ behavior and the streetscape level. In addition, the analyses distinguish between frequent and less frequent walkers in order to understand differences in characteristics, behavior, preferences, and perceptions between these two groups. The results of this study with a sample of <em>n</em> = 4,637 respondents show that the relevance of the built environment is higher for leisure walking than for utilitarian walking and higher for frequent walkers compared to less frequent walkers. For leisure walking, “protection”-variables are ranked high (e.g. safety, security), followed by “comfort” (e.g. space, surface quality) and by “delight” (e.g. attractive buildings, greenery). Distance is key for utilitarian walking. Significant differences between frequent and less frequent walkers are identified mainly for the “Delight”-variables, this is attractive buildings and greenery for utilitarian walking, and space availability and street furniture for leisure walking. These differences should be considered in future research and street design practice which might preferably focus on the most demanding person group of frequent walkers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831824000017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831824000017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

步行作为体育活动的一种,不仅有益于个人健康,还能在环境、经济和社会等方面促进可持续发展。本研究以德国至少有 10 万居民的代表性城市为样本进行横断面调查,研究了居民步行行为的决定因素。为了调查受访者对建筑环境特征重要性的认知差异,并弥合居民行为的个体层面与街道景观层面之间的差距,本研究区分了休闲步行的城市长廊和功利性步行的超市之旅两种情境。此外,分析还区分了经常步行者和不经常步行者,以了解这两个群体在特征、行为、偏好和认知方面的差异。这项以 n = 4,637 名受访者为样本的研究结果表明,建筑环境对休闲步行的相关性高于对功利性步行的相关性,对经常步行者的相关性高于对不经常步行者的相关性。在休闲步行中,"保护 "变量排名靠前(如安全、保安),其次是 "舒适"(如空间、地面质量)和 "愉悦"(如有吸引力的建筑、绿化)。距离是功利性步行的关键。经常步行者和不经常步行者之间的显著差异主要体现在 "愉悦 "变量上,对于功利性步行而言,愉悦是指有吸引力的建筑和绿化,而对于休闲性步行而言,愉悦是指空间可用性和街道设施。在今后的研究和街道设计实践中,应考虑到这些差异,最好将重点放在要求最严格的经常步行者群体上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived importance of context-specific built-environment factors of walking: A new perspective for prioritizing policy measures for promoting walking

Walking as one type of physical activity generates benefits for personal health and contributes to sustainability in its environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Based on a cross-sectional survey for a representative sample of German cities with at least 100,000 residents, this study investigates determinants of residents’ walking behavior. Two contexts of promenading in the city for leisure walking and the trip to the supermarket for utilitarian walking are distinguished in order to investigate differences in respondents’ perceived importance of built-environment characteristics and to bridge the gap between the individual level of residents’ behavior and the streetscape level. In addition, the analyses distinguish between frequent and less frequent walkers in order to understand differences in characteristics, behavior, preferences, and perceptions between these two groups. The results of this study with a sample of n = 4,637 respondents show that the relevance of the built environment is higher for leisure walking than for utilitarian walking and higher for frequent walkers compared to less frequent walkers. For leisure walking, “protection”-variables are ranked high (e.g. safety, security), followed by “comfort” (e.g. space, surface quality) and by “delight” (e.g. attractive buildings, greenery). Distance is key for utilitarian walking. Significant differences between frequent and less frequent walkers are identified mainly for the “Delight”-variables, this is attractive buildings and greenery for utilitarian walking, and space availability and street furniture for leisure walking. These differences should be considered in future research and street design practice which might preferably focus on the most demanding person group of frequent walkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Driving the future: How value retention rate shapes electric vehicle adoption Last mile delivery with drones: A carbon emissions comparison Perceived seriousness of environmental issues and the influence of willingness to pay for hybrid vehicles: An anthropological extension of the theory of planned behavior Cargo bikes for personal transport: A user segmentation based on motivations for use Am I really willing to use my electric vehicle sustainably? A study on the charging preferences of electric vehicle users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1