{"title":"通过评级转换矩阵衡量全球前 1000 家银行/G-SIBs/投资银行的表现","authors":"Indranarain Ramlall","doi":"10.1177/09721509231221917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the prevalence of commercial banks’ rankings by The Banker, yet, no research has been undertaken to gauge on the transitional performance of these banks. This study attempts to fulfil such a research gap by focusing on finer rating categories under an interval gap of 50 banks, a time horizon of one year under a full time spanning from 2010 to 2020. A novel technique is deployed, namely rating transition matrices (RTMs) to gauge on the transition of ratings of banks over time. Findings show that probabilities assigned to unchanged ratings are relatively more pronounced relative to those attached to changed ratings. Evidence is found as to most banks found in the list of the top 50 banks being able to preserve their rating category over a decade with COVID-19 entailing no major effects on their RTMs. Policy wise, the Financial Stability Board could consider the full list of top 50 banks as globally systemically important banks. Absence of leapfrogging in RTMs substantiates a rather ‘less intrusive’ nature of banking business in the world.","PeriodicalId":47569,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gauging on the Performance of Top 1,000 Banks/G-SIBs/Investment Banks in the World via Rating Transition Matrices\",\"authors\":\"Indranarain Ramlall\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09721509231221917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the prevalence of commercial banks’ rankings by The Banker, yet, no research has been undertaken to gauge on the transitional performance of these banks. This study attempts to fulfil such a research gap by focusing on finer rating categories under an interval gap of 50 banks, a time horizon of one year under a full time spanning from 2010 to 2020. A novel technique is deployed, namely rating transition matrices (RTMs) to gauge on the transition of ratings of banks over time. Findings show that probabilities assigned to unchanged ratings are relatively more pronounced relative to those attached to changed ratings. Evidence is found as to most banks found in the list of the top 50 banks being able to preserve their rating category over a decade with COVID-19 entailing no major effects on their RTMs. Policy wise, the Financial Stability Board could consider the full list of top 50 banks as globally systemically important banks. Absence of leapfrogging in RTMs substantiates a rather ‘less intrusive’ nature of banking business in the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231221917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231221917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gauging on the Performance of Top 1,000 Banks/G-SIBs/Investment Banks in the World via Rating Transition Matrices
Despite the prevalence of commercial banks’ rankings by The Banker, yet, no research has been undertaken to gauge on the transitional performance of these banks. This study attempts to fulfil such a research gap by focusing on finer rating categories under an interval gap of 50 banks, a time horizon of one year under a full time spanning from 2010 to 2020. A novel technique is deployed, namely rating transition matrices (RTMs) to gauge on the transition of ratings of banks over time. Findings show that probabilities assigned to unchanged ratings are relatively more pronounced relative to those attached to changed ratings. Evidence is found as to most banks found in the list of the top 50 banks being able to preserve their rating category over a decade with COVID-19 entailing no major effects on their RTMs. Policy wise, the Financial Stability Board could consider the full list of top 50 banks as globally systemically important banks. Absence of leapfrogging in RTMs substantiates a rather ‘less intrusive’ nature of banking business in the world.
期刊介绍:
Global Business Review is designed to be a forum for the wider dissemination of current management and business practice and research drawn from around the globe but with an emphasis on Asian and Indian perspectives. An important feature is its cross-cultural and comparative approach. Multidisciplinary in nature and with a strong practical orientation, this refereed journal publishes surveys relating to and report significant developments in management practice drawn from business/commerce, the public and the private sector, and non-profit organisations. The journal also publishes articles which provide practical insights on doing business in India/Asia from local and global and macro and micro perspectives.