在进行腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射时,用超声波和核磁共振成像测量的硬膜外间隙深度与临床阻力损失之间的相关性。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2023-105135
Naileshni Singh, Scott Pritzlaff, Barry Bautista, Charley Yan, Machelle D Wilson, Jennifer Chang, Scott M Fishman
{"title":"在进行腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射时,用超声波和核磁共振成像测量的硬膜外间隙深度与临床阻力损失之间的相关性。","authors":"Naileshni Singh, Scott Pritzlaff, Barry Bautista, Charley Yan, Machelle D Wilson, Jennifer Chang, Scott M Fishman","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-105135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study assessed the accuracy of MRI and ultrasound (US) measurements as a preprocedural assessment tool for predicting clinical loss of resistance depth (CLORD) during fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty patients enrolled received lumbar ESIs at an academic chronic pain clinic. The MRI measurement calculated the distance between the skin and the posterior epidural space, while US measurements included transverse and parasagittal oblique views of the interlaminar space. The epidural space measurements were compared with the CLORD during the performance of the prone epidural injections. The differences in measurements were analyzed using two one-sided tests for equivalency with a 0.5 equivalency margin. The intraclass correlation coefficients between CLORD and the imaging modalities were estimated using mixed effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI was equivalent to CLORD with a mean difference of -0.2 cm (95% CI -0.39 to -0.11). US transverse and US parasagittal oblique measurements were not equivalent to and underestimated CLORD with mean differences of -0.98 cm (90% CI -1.8 to -0.77) and -0.79 cm (90% CI -1.0 to -5.9), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients between MRI and CLORD were the highest at 0.85, compared with 0.65 and 0.73 for transverse and parasagittal oblique US views, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI measurements are preferable over US for preprocedural assessment of patients receiving lumbar ESIs for predicting CLORD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"871-876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between epidural space depth measured with ultrasound and MRI compared to clinical loss of resistance when performing lumbar epidural steroid injection.\",\"authors\":\"Naileshni Singh, Scott Pritzlaff, Barry Bautista, Charley Yan, Machelle D Wilson, Jennifer Chang, Scott M Fishman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2023-105135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study assessed the accuracy of MRI and ultrasound (US) measurements as a preprocedural assessment tool for predicting clinical loss of resistance depth (CLORD) during fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty patients enrolled received lumbar ESIs at an academic chronic pain clinic. The MRI measurement calculated the distance between the skin and the posterior epidural space, while US measurements included transverse and parasagittal oblique views of the interlaminar space. The epidural space measurements were compared with the CLORD during the performance of the prone epidural injections. The differences in measurements were analyzed using two one-sided tests for equivalency with a 0.5 equivalency margin. The intraclass correlation coefficients between CLORD and the imaging modalities were estimated using mixed effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI was equivalent to CLORD with a mean difference of -0.2 cm (95% CI -0.39 to -0.11). US transverse and US parasagittal oblique measurements were not equivalent to and underestimated CLORD with mean differences of -0.98 cm (90% CI -1.8 to -0.77) and -0.79 cm (90% CI -1.0 to -5.9), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients between MRI and CLORD were the highest at 0.85, compared with 0.65 and 0.73 for transverse and parasagittal oblique US views, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI measurements are preferable over US for preprocedural assessment of patients receiving lumbar ESIs for predicting CLORD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"871-876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105135\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景这项前瞻性研究评估了核磁共振成像(MRI)和超声波(US)测量作为术前评估工具的准确性,以预测透视引导下腰部硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)过程中临床阻力损失深度(CLORD):60 名患者在一家学术性慢性疼痛诊所接受了腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射。核磁共振成像测量计算的是皮肤与硬膜外后间隙之间的距离,而超声波测量包括层间隙的横切面和矢状斜切面。在进行俯卧硬膜外注射时,硬膜外间隙测量值与 CLORD 进行了比较。测量结果的差异采用两个单侧等效检验进行分析,等效差为 0.5。使用混合效应模型估算了 CLORD 与成像模式之间的类内相关系数:核磁共振成像与 CLORD 相等,平均差值为-0.2 厘米(95% CI -0.39--0.11)。US 横断面和 US 副矢状斜面测量结果与 CLORD 并不等同,而且低估了 CLORD,平均差异分别为 -0.98 厘米(90% CI -1.8 至 -0.77)和 -0.79 厘米(90% CI -1.0 至 -5.9)。核磁共振成像与CLORD的类内相关系数最高,为0.85,而US横切面和矢状斜切面的类内相关系数分别为0.65和0.73:结论:在对接受腰椎ESI的患者进行术前评估以预测CLORD时,磁共振成像测量优于US测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation between epidural space depth measured with ultrasound and MRI compared to clinical loss of resistance when performing lumbar epidural steroid injection.

Background: This prospective study assessed the accuracy of MRI and ultrasound (US) measurements as a preprocedural assessment tool for predicting clinical loss of resistance depth (CLORD) during fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs).

Materials and methods: Sixty patients enrolled received lumbar ESIs at an academic chronic pain clinic. The MRI measurement calculated the distance between the skin and the posterior epidural space, while US measurements included transverse and parasagittal oblique views of the interlaminar space. The epidural space measurements were compared with the CLORD during the performance of the prone epidural injections. The differences in measurements were analyzed using two one-sided tests for equivalency with a 0.5 equivalency margin. The intraclass correlation coefficients between CLORD and the imaging modalities were estimated using mixed effects models.

Results: MRI was equivalent to CLORD with a mean difference of -0.2 cm (95% CI -0.39 to -0.11). US transverse and US parasagittal oblique measurements were not equivalent to and underestimated CLORD with mean differences of -0.98 cm (90% CI -1.8 to -0.77) and -0.79 cm (90% CI -1.0 to -5.9), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients between MRI and CLORD were the highest at 0.85, compared with 0.65 and 0.73 for transverse and parasagittal oblique US views, respectively.

Conclusions: MRI measurements are preferable over US for preprocedural assessment of patients receiving lumbar ESIs for predicting CLORD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Cadaveric study of the obturator nerve: frequency of skin innervation and the optimal site for blocking the cutaneous branch. Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Letter to the editor: Is medetomidine the next perioperative substance of abuse? Perineuromal hydrodissection for acute postamputation pain? An observational study in a time of war. FRONT block: a cadaveric study of a dual-plane injection block targeting femoral rami and obturator nerve trunk for anterior hip joint analgesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1