蛔虫捐赠请求是否总是首选:结账慈善案例

Neel Das, Lubna Nafees, Unal O. Boya, Anindita Das
{"title":"蛔虫捐赠请求是否总是首选:结账慈善案例","authors":"Neel Das, Lubna Nafees, Unal O. Boya, Anindita Das","doi":"10.1007/s12208-024-00397-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research attempts to build a basic framework for understanding a fast-growing but little-investigated prosocial solicitation, checkout charity, by looking at round-up or a flat amount donate request, a priori liking of the charity, checkout mode (self-service or cashier), and presence of others (friends or strangers). Three scenario-based lab experiments were conducted. A clear preference for roundup donation request exists only when the scenario in the experiment mentioned that the charity was not particularly liked and checkout was done by the cashier (versus a self-checkout machine). Investigating the cashier condition further, the preference for a roundup request is only exhibited when the scenario mentioned that the charity was not particularly liked and strangers (versus friends) were present during the solicitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":42632,"journal":{"name":"International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is roundup donation request always preferred: a case for checkout charity\",\"authors\":\"Neel Das, Lubna Nafees, Unal O. Boya, Anindita Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12208-024-00397-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research attempts to build a basic framework for understanding a fast-growing but little-investigated prosocial solicitation, checkout charity, by looking at round-up or a flat amount donate request, a priori liking of the charity, checkout mode (self-service or cashier), and presence of others (friends or strangers). Three scenario-based lab experiments were conducted. A clear preference for roundup donation request exists only when the scenario in the experiment mentioned that the charity was not particularly liked and checkout was done by the cashier (versus a self-checkout machine). Investigating the cashier condition further, the preference for a roundup request is only exhibited when the scenario mentioned that the charity was not particularly liked and strangers (versus friends) were present during the solicitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-024-00397-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-024-00397-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图建立一个基本框架,通过四舍五入或定额捐款请求、对慈善机构的先验喜好、结账模式(自助或收银)以及他人(朋友或陌生人)的存在,来理解一种快速增长但鲜有研究的亲社会募捐--结账慈善。我们进行了三个基于场景的实验室实验。只有在实验场景中提到慈善机构不是特别受人喜欢,以及结账由收银员完成(而不是自助结账机)时,才会出现对整数捐款请求的明显偏好。进一步研究收银员条件,只有当场景提到慈善机构不是特别受人喜欢,且募捐时有陌生人(而不是朋友)在场时,才会表现出对四舍五入募捐要求的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is roundup donation request always preferred: a case for checkout charity

This research attempts to build a basic framework for understanding a fast-growing but little-investigated prosocial solicitation, checkout charity, by looking at round-up or a flat amount donate request, a priori liking of the charity, checkout mode (self-service or cashier), and presence of others (friends or strangers). Three scenario-based lab experiments were conducted. A clear preference for roundup donation request exists only when the scenario in the experiment mentioned that the charity was not particularly liked and checkout was done by the cashier (versus a self-checkout machine). Investigating the cashier condition further, the preference for a roundup request is only exhibited when the scenario mentioned that the charity was not particularly liked and strangers (versus friends) were present during the solicitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, an international scientific journal, publishes English-language articles and case reports in the field of public and nonprofit marketing and closely related disciplines. Relevant doctoral thesis reviews and book reviews are also welcome. The main objective of the Review is to foster the study of marketing topics from an interdisciplinary perspective and provide a forum for researchers interested in examining these issues from practical and theoretical viewpoints. Establishing a common vocabulary with which to discuss methods, procedures, results and experiences will improve the exchange of ideas between participants of varied backgrounds. To be accessible to a diverse community of academics and professionals, the Review will only accept articles that display strict scientific rigor and excellent expository clarity. First-rate scientific quality is guaranteed by a large editorial board composed of internationally recognized experts from prestigious academic and research institutions. Papers submitted for publication are evaluated through a double blind refereeing process. Manuscripts should not exceed 20 pages (450 words per page). This page limit includes all figures, tables, appendices and references. Officially cited as: Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark
期刊最新文献
Unravelling customer gratitude: navigating the literature and paving the way forward with the TCCM framework Frugal people give more? The moderating role of beneficiary number in eliciting donation intention Rendering misery or selling hope? The mechanism of imagery contrast effect in charitable appeal Institutional trust as a driver of product boycotts in Europe The role of engagement in retaining volunteers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1