土壤质地、分层和水头对入渗率和入渗模型精度的影响

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Irrigation and Drainage Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1002/ird.2918
Azizeh Alizadeh Berdouki, Sina Besharat, Kamran Zeinalzadeh, Cristina Cruz
{"title":"土壤质地、分层和水头对入渗率和入渗模型精度的影响","authors":"Azizeh Alizadeh Berdouki,&nbsp;Sina Besharat,&nbsp;Kamran Zeinalzadeh,&nbsp;Cristina Cruz","doi":"10.1002/ird.2918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infiltration is one of the most important physical characteristics of soil and depends on various factors. This study investigated the influence of soil texture, layering and water head on the soil water infiltration rate. It also selected the most accurate infiltration models to determine the water infiltration rate in homogeneous and heterogeneous soil profiles. Experiments were carried out in four soil containers with a length, width and height of 20 × 20 × 70 cm. Treatments consisted of two soil textures (sandy loam, SL; clay loam, CL), four soil profiles (homogeneous texture, SL and CL; and heterogeneous texture, lighter texture on the top, SL/CL, and heavier texture on the top CL/SL) and three water head sizes (4, 7 and 10 cm). Several models were used to determine the water infiltration rate under homogeneous (Kostiakov, modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS-1D) and heterogeneous soils (traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS-1D). According to the results, the infiltration rate decreased over time and along the soil profile. Nevertheless, it jumped at the interface of two-layered soils when the heavier soil was in the bottom layer (SC treatments) due to the high potential of the second layer, and then it decreased. In the reverse layering, the infiltration rate in the interface was lowest (CS treatments) because of the higher hydraulic conductivity of the second layer. Additionally, the infiltration rate increased with increasing water head, but the rate of this increase was higher by changing the water head from 7 to 10 cm. The results of infiltration models showed that the accuracy of these models was higher in clay loam texture than in sandy loam texture. The modified Green–Ampt was the most accurate model in homogeneous and layered soils, with average RMSE of 0.0204 and 0.019, respectively. The Horton model had the weakest simulation in homogeneous soils, with an average RMSE of 0.1299. Additionally, the accuracy of HYDRUS-1D in layered soils was less than that in homogeneous soils (NS of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively), and its accuracy decreased with increasing water head in most treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14848,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and Drainage","volume":"73 3","pages":"846-865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of soil texture, layering and water head on the infiltration rate and infiltration model accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Azizeh Alizadeh Berdouki,&nbsp;Sina Besharat,&nbsp;Kamran Zeinalzadeh,&nbsp;Cristina Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ird.2918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Infiltration is one of the most important physical characteristics of soil and depends on various factors. This study investigated the influence of soil texture, layering and water head on the soil water infiltration rate. It also selected the most accurate infiltration models to determine the water infiltration rate in homogeneous and heterogeneous soil profiles. Experiments were carried out in four soil containers with a length, width and height of 20 × 20 × 70 cm. Treatments consisted of two soil textures (sandy loam, SL; clay loam, CL), four soil profiles (homogeneous texture, SL and CL; and heterogeneous texture, lighter texture on the top, SL/CL, and heavier texture on the top CL/SL) and three water head sizes (4, 7 and 10 cm). Several models were used to determine the water infiltration rate under homogeneous (Kostiakov, modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS-1D) and heterogeneous soils (traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS-1D). According to the results, the infiltration rate decreased over time and along the soil profile. Nevertheless, it jumped at the interface of two-layered soils when the heavier soil was in the bottom layer (SC treatments) due to the high potential of the second layer, and then it decreased. In the reverse layering, the infiltration rate in the interface was lowest (CS treatments) because of the higher hydraulic conductivity of the second layer. Additionally, the infiltration rate increased with increasing water head, but the rate of this increase was higher by changing the water head from 7 to 10 cm. The results of infiltration models showed that the accuracy of these models was higher in clay loam texture than in sandy loam texture. The modified Green–Ampt was the most accurate model in homogeneous and layered soils, with average RMSE of 0.0204 and 0.019, respectively. The Horton model had the weakest simulation in homogeneous soils, with an average RMSE of 0.1299. Additionally, the accuracy of HYDRUS-1D in layered soils was less than that in homogeneous soils (NS of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively), and its accuracy decreased with increasing water head in most treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"846-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.2918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and Drainage","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.2918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

渗透是土壤最重要的物理特性之一,取决于多种因素。本研究探讨了土壤质地、分层和水头对土壤水渗透率的影响。研究还选择了最准确的渗透模型来确定均质和异质土壤剖面中的水渗透率。实验在长、宽、高分别为 20 × 20 × 70 厘米的四个土壤容器中进行。处理包括两种土壤质地(沙壤土,SL;粘壤土,CL)、四种土壤剖面(均质质地,SL 和 CL;异质质地,顶部质地较轻,SL/CL,顶部质地较重,CL/SL)和三种水头大小(4、7 和 10 厘米)。在均质土壤(Kostiakov、改良 Kostiakov、Philip、Horton、传统 Green-Ampt、改良 Green-Ampt 和 HYDRUS-1D)和异质土壤(传统 Green-Ampt、改良 Green-Ampt 和 HYDRUS-1D)条件下,使用了多种模型来确定水的渗透率。结果表明,随着时间的推移和土壤剖面的变化,渗透率有所下降。然而,当较重的土壤位于底层(SC 处理)时,由于第二层的高电位,渗透率在两层土壤的交界处猛增,随后又下降。在反向分层中,由于第二层的水力传导性较高,界面处的渗透率最低(CS 处理)。此外,渗透率随着水头的增加而增加,但当水头从 7 厘米增加到 10 厘米时,渗透率的增加率更高。渗透模型的结果表明,这些模型在粘壤土质中的准确性高于砂壤土质。修正的格林-安普特模型在均质土和层状土中精度最高,平均均方根误差分别为 0.0204 和 0.019。霍顿模型在均质土壤中的模拟效果最差,平均均方根误差为 0.1299。此外,HYDRUS-1D 在层状土壤中的精度低于均质土壤(NS 分别为 0.95 和 0.85),在大多数处理中,其精度随着水头的增加而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of soil texture, layering and water head on the infiltration rate and infiltration model accuracy

Infiltration is one of the most important physical characteristics of soil and depends on various factors. This study investigated the influence of soil texture, layering and water head on the soil water infiltration rate. It also selected the most accurate infiltration models to determine the water infiltration rate in homogeneous and heterogeneous soil profiles. Experiments were carried out in four soil containers with a length, width and height of 20 × 20 × 70 cm. Treatments consisted of two soil textures (sandy loam, SL; clay loam, CL), four soil profiles (homogeneous texture, SL and CL; and heterogeneous texture, lighter texture on the top, SL/CL, and heavier texture on the top CL/SL) and three water head sizes (4, 7 and 10 cm). Several models were used to determine the water infiltration rate under homogeneous (Kostiakov, modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS-1D) and heterogeneous soils (traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS-1D). According to the results, the infiltration rate decreased over time and along the soil profile. Nevertheless, it jumped at the interface of two-layered soils when the heavier soil was in the bottom layer (SC treatments) due to the high potential of the second layer, and then it decreased. In the reverse layering, the infiltration rate in the interface was lowest (CS treatments) because of the higher hydraulic conductivity of the second layer. Additionally, the infiltration rate increased with increasing water head, but the rate of this increase was higher by changing the water head from 7 to 10 cm. The results of infiltration models showed that the accuracy of these models was higher in clay loam texture than in sandy loam texture. The modified Green–Ampt was the most accurate model in homogeneous and layered soils, with average RMSE of 0.0204 and 0.019, respectively. The Horton model had the weakest simulation in homogeneous soils, with an average RMSE of 0.1299. Additionally, the accuracy of HYDRUS-1D in layered soils was less than that in homogeneous soils (NS of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively), and its accuracy decreased with increasing water head in most treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irrigation and Drainage
Irrigation and Drainage 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Human intervention in the control of water for sustainable agricultural development involves the application of technology and management approaches to: (i) provide the appropriate quantities of water when it is needed by the crops, (ii) prevent salinisation and water-logging of the root zone, (iii) protect land from flooding, and (iv) maximise the beneficial use of water by appropriate allocation, conservation and reuse. All this has to be achieved within a framework of economic, social and environmental constraints. The Journal, therefore, covers a wide range of subjects, advancement in which, through high quality papers in the Journal, will make a significant contribution to the enormous task of satisfying the needs of the world’s ever-increasing population. The Journal also publishes book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information ASSESSING IMPACT OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS Issue Information Transboundary aspects of agricultural water management Climate-driven runoff variability in semi-mountainous reservoirs of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Insights for sustainable water management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1