系带皮肤牵引缝合技术

Ashwath V. H. Venkataramana, Manjunath Byadigere, Abdul Razack, H. Ranganath, Aeiman Saniya, H. Arish, Suraj Pattar
{"title":"系带皮肤牵引缝合技术","authors":"Ashwath V. H. Venkataramana, Manjunath Byadigere, Abdul Razack, H. Ranganath, Aeiman Saniya, H. Arish, Suraj Pattar","doi":"10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hailing from a tertiary government-aided center, infected surgical wounds varying from diabetic foot and necrotizing fasciitis to surgical site infection are by far the most common cluster of cases encountered in our practice. Due to an overall lack of patient education on wounds, most of these patients present late, necessitating extensive debridement and tissue loss. \nAim and Objective: To describe the lacing dermatotraction technique and to study its application in aiding early secondary closure of infected surgical wounds. \nMaterial and Methods: An interventional Study was conducted at VICTORIA Hospital, Bangalore, from February 2020 to October 2021. Fifty-four patients with Infected wounds were debrided until healthy margins were obtained, followed by applying the shoelace tension lacing suture. This consisted of an infant feeding tube running under loops of prolene fixed 1 cm away from the edge of the wound. One end of the IFT is anchored to the skin, and the other is held in position with single throws of no-1 silk suture, which can be loosened at the next sitting for adequate wound exposure, which aids in better debridement. The tension suture is again tightened to attain the maximal possible wound approximation.   Thus, constant traction on the skin edges creates progressive closure until secondary closure is achieved. \nResults: 54 Patients were enrolled, consisting of 8 amputation stump infections, 11 diabetic foot, 14 disarticulations, five bed sore, 12 fasciotomies, three mastectomy flap necrosis, and one traumatic avulsion. There were 38 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The mean duration of the wound at presentation was 17 days, and they were subjected to an average of 11 days of debridement. Mean wound dimensions - length= 11.02cm, breadth=4.86cm and area = 53.55 cm2. On applying the lacing, the wounds were debrided for an average of 8.85 days with 2.9 tightening. Secondary closure was achieved in 45 (83.33%) patients,. \nConclusion: The lacing technique is inexpensive and safe to achieve early secondary closure of infected wounds. It avoids the need for skin grafts, reducing the need for anesthesia, hospital expenditure, and duration of hospital stay of patients. \n ","PeriodicalId":32905,"journal":{"name":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lacing Dermatotraction Suturing Technique\",\"authors\":\"Ashwath V. H. Venkataramana, Manjunath Byadigere, Abdul Razack, H. Ranganath, Aeiman Saniya, H. Arish, Suraj Pattar\",\"doi\":\"10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Hailing from a tertiary government-aided center, infected surgical wounds varying from diabetic foot and necrotizing fasciitis to surgical site infection are by far the most common cluster of cases encountered in our practice. Due to an overall lack of patient education on wounds, most of these patients present late, necessitating extensive debridement and tissue loss. \\nAim and Objective: To describe the lacing dermatotraction technique and to study its application in aiding early secondary closure of infected surgical wounds. \\nMaterial and Methods: An interventional Study was conducted at VICTORIA Hospital, Bangalore, from February 2020 to October 2021. Fifty-four patients with Infected wounds were debrided until healthy margins were obtained, followed by applying the shoelace tension lacing suture. This consisted of an infant feeding tube running under loops of prolene fixed 1 cm away from the edge of the wound. One end of the IFT is anchored to the skin, and the other is held in position with single throws of no-1 silk suture, which can be loosened at the next sitting for adequate wound exposure, which aids in better debridement. The tension suture is again tightened to attain the maximal possible wound approximation.   Thus, constant traction on the skin edges creates progressive closure until secondary closure is achieved. \\nResults: 54 Patients were enrolled, consisting of 8 amputation stump infections, 11 diabetic foot, 14 disarticulations, five bed sore, 12 fasciotomies, three mastectomy flap necrosis, and one traumatic avulsion. There were 38 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The mean duration of the wound at presentation was 17 days, and they were subjected to an average of 11 days of debridement. Mean wound dimensions - length= 11.02cm, breadth=4.86cm and area = 53.55 cm2. On applying the lacing, the wounds were debrided for an average of 8.85 days with 2.9 tightening. Secondary closure was achieved in 45 (83.33%) patients,. \\nConclusion: The lacing technique is inexpensive and safe to achieve early secondary closure of infected wounds. It avoids the need for skin grafts, reducing the need for anesthesia, hospital expenditure, and duration of hospital stay of patients. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":32905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v8i1.377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:我们来自一家政府资助的三级医疗中心,感染性手术伤口(从糖尿病足和坏死性筋膜炎到手术部位感染)是我们迄今为止遇到的最常见的一组病例。由于总体上缺乏对患者的伤口教育,这些患者大多发病较晚,需要进行大面积清创并造成组织损失。目的和目标:描述系带皮肤牵引技术,并研究其在帮助感染性手术伤口早期二次闭合中的应用。材料与方法:2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 10 月在班加罗尔维多利亚医院进行了一项介入性研究。对 54 名感染伤口患者进行清创,直至获得健康的伤口边缘,然后应用鞋带张力系带缝合。这包括在距离伤口边缘 1 厘米处固定的一圈普洛林下铺设婴儿喂食管。IFT 的一端固定在皮肤上,另一端用单股 1 号丝线缝合固定。再次拉紧缝合线,以达到最大可能的伤口接近度。 这样,对皮肤边缘的持续牵引会使伤口逐渐闭合,直至实现二次闭合。结果54 名患者参加了手术,其中包括 8 例截肢残端感染、11 例糖尿病足、14 例断肢、5 例褥疮、12 例筋膜切开术、3 例乳房切除皮瓣坏死和 1 例外伤性撕脱。其中男性 38 人,女性 16 人,平均年龄 53.4 岁。伤口出现时的平均持续时间为 17 天,平均清创时间为 11 天。平均伤口尺寸--长=11.02厘米,宽=4.86厘米,面积=53.55平方厘米。使用系带后,伤口平均清创 8.85 天,收紧 2.9 天。45例(83.33%)患者实现了二次闭合。结论绑带技术可实现感染伤口的早期二次闭合,成本低廉且安全。它避免了植皮的需要,减少了麻醉、住院费用和患者住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Lacing Dermatotraction Suturing Technique
Introduction: Hailing from a tertiary government-aided center, infected surgical wounds varying from diabetic foot and necrotizing fasciitis to surgical site infection are by far the most common cluster of cases encountered in our practice. Due to an overall lack of patient education on wounds, most of these patients present late, necessitating extensive debridement and tissue loss. Aim and Objective: To describe the lacing dermatotraction technique and to study its application in aiding early secondary closure of infected surgical wounds. Material and Methods: An interventional Study was conducted at VICTORIA Hospital, Bangalore, from February 2020 to October 2021. Fifty-four patients with Infected wounds were debrided until healthy margins were obtained, followed by applying the shoelace tension lacing suture. This consisted of an infant feeding tube running under loops of prolene fixed 1 cm away from the edge of the wound. One end of the IFT is anchored to the skin, and the other is held in position with single throws of no-1 silk suture, which can be loosened at the next sitting for adequate wound exposure, which aids in better debridement. The tension suture is again tightened to attain the maximal possible wound approximation.   Thus, constant traction on the skin edges creates progressive closure until secondary closure is achieved. Results: 54 Patients were enrolled, consisting of 8 amputation stump infections, 11 diabetic foot, 14 disarticulations, five bed sore, 12 fasciotomies, three mastectomy flap necrosis, and one traumatic avulsion. There were 38 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The mean duration of the wound at presentation was 17 days, and they were subjected to an average of 11 days of debridement. Mean wound dimensions - length= 11.02cm, breadth=4.86cm and area = 53.55 cm2. On applying the lacing, the wounds were debrided for an average of 8.85 days with 2.9 tightening. Secondary closure was achieved in 45 (83.33%) patients,. Conclusion: The lacing technique is inexpensive and safe to achieve early secondary closure of infected wounds. It avoids the need for skin grafts, reducing the need for anesthesia, hospital expenditure, and duration of hospital stay of patients.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Liver Abscess after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Case Report. Study Size Impact on Accuracy of the Worldwide Incidence of Pilonidal Sinus Management of Periarthritis Shoulder by Intra-Articular Steroid Injection and Shoulder Joint Manipulation Complications of Implantation of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Wernicke’s Encephalopathy from Hyperemesis Gravidarum. A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1