COVID-19第五次調查中香港東聯網深切治療部住院病人的臨床特徵及死亡率預測

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1002/hkj2.12007
MY Man, SM Lam, Syj Yu, Jya Chan, MY Lee, H. Shum, WW Yan
{"title":"COVID-19第五次調查中香港東聯網深切治療部住院病人的臨床特徵及死亡率預測","authors":"MY Man, SM Lam, Syj Yu, Jya Chan, MY Lee, H. Shum, WW Yan","doi":"10.1002/hkj2.12007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID‐19 has been threatening global public health since 2019. To address the overwhelming caseload, several tools were developed to predict prognosis and aid triage of critically ill patients for intensive care. Currently, there is a lack of local data on the validity of such tools.The objective of this study is to identify the predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in COVID‐19 patients in Hong Kong and externally validate the different scoring systems.A retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the HKEC ICUs from 1 January 2022 to 30 April 2022 was performed. We collected data on patient demographics, vaccination status, laboratory parameters, and clinical outcomes including need for organ support and mortality. Clinical severities were estimated by Sequential Organ Failure Score, 4C Mortality Score, COVID‐Gram score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score based on the original studies. Comparison between individual scoring systems' performance on hospital mortality was conducted and summarized.In these four months, 137 patients with COVID‐19 admitted to ICUs of Ruttonjee Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital were recruited. 64 patients (46.7%) were admitted for COVID‐19 related respiratory failure, among which mortality was 66.7%. The overall hospital and ICU mortality were 21.9% and 13.1%, respectively. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR 3.221, p 0.034), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy (OR 3.107, p 0.039), and higher APACHE IV score (OR 1.043, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of hospital mortality using multivariate analysis. The scoring systems had good performance in mortality prediction in our population. The APACHE IV score (AUROC 0.79, 95% CI 0.698–0.894) and 4C Mortality Score (AUROC 0.751, 95% CI 0.657–0.844) outperformed other scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality.In patients with COVID‐19, the use of IMV or HFNC and APACHE IV score were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The APACHE IV and the 4C Mortality Score were most useful in our population for predicting ICU and hospital mortality.","PeriodicalId":50401,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics and mortality prediction of patients admitted to the Hong Kong East Cluster intensive care units in the COVID‐19 fifth wave\",\"authors\":\"MY Man, SM Lam, Syj Yu, Jya Chan, MY Lee, H. Shum, WW Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hkj2.12007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID‐19 has been threatening global public health since 2019. To address the overwhelming caseload, several tools were developed to predict prognosis and aid triage of critically ill patients for intensive care. Currently, there is a lack of local data on the validity of such tools.The objective of this study is to identify the predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in COVID‐19 patients in Hong Kong and externally validate the different scoring systems.A retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the HKEC ICUs from 1 January 2022 to 30 April 2022 was performed. We collected data on patient demographics, vaccination status, laboratory parameters, and clinical outcomes including need for organ support and mortality. Clinical severities were estimated by Sequential Organ Failure Score, 4C Mortality Score, COVID‐Gram score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score based on the original studies. Comparison between individual scoring systems' performance on hospital mortality was conducted and summarized.In these four months, 137 patients with COVID‐19 admitted to ICUs of Ruttonjee Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital were recruited. 64 patients (46.7%) were admitted for COVID‐19 related respiratory failure, among which mortality was 66.7%. The overall hospital and ICU mortality were 21.9% and 13.1%, respectively. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR 3.221, p 0.034), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy (OR 3.107, p 0.039), and higher APACHE IV score (OR 1.043, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of hospital mortality using multivariate analysis. The scoring systems had good performance in mortality prediction in our population. The APACHE IV score (AUROC 0.79, 95% CI 0.698–0.894) and 4C Mortality Score (AUROC 0.751, 95% CI 0.657–0.844) outperformed other scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality.In patients with COVID‐19, the use of IMV or HFNC and APACHE IV score were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The APACHE IV and the 4C Mortality Score were most useful in our population for predicting ICU and hospital mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.12007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.12007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 自 2019 年以来一直威胁着全球公共卫生。为了应对巨大的病例量,人们开发了几种工具来预测预后并帮助将重症患者分流至重症监护室。本研究旨在确定香港COVID-19患者重症监护室(ICU)死亡率的预测因素,并对不同的评分系统进行外部验证。我们对2022年1月1日至2022年4月30日期间入住香港教育中心重症监护室的患者进行了回顾性队列分析。我们收集了患者的人口统计学资料、疫苗接种情况、实验室参数以及临床结果(包括器官支持需求和死亡率)。临床严重程度根据原始研究,通过序贯器官衰竭评分、4C死亡率评分、COVID-Gram评分和急性生理学与慢性病健康评估(APACHE)IV评分进行估计。在这四个月中,共有 137 名 COVID-19 患者入住 Ruttonjee 医院和 Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern 医院的重症监护室。其中 64 名患者(46.7%)因 COVID-19 导致的呼吸衰竭而入院,死亡率为 66.7%。医院和重症监护室的总死亡率分别为 21.9% 和 13.1%。通过多变量分析,有创机械通气(IMV)(OR 3.221,P 0.034)、高流量鼻插管(HFNC)氧疗(OR 3.107,P 0.039)和较高的 APACHE IV 评分(OR 1.043,P < 0.001)是住院死亡率的独立预测因素。这些评分系统在预测我国人群的死亡率方面表现良好。在预测住院死亡率方面,APACHE IV评分(AUROC 0.79,95% CI 0.698-0.894)和4C死亡率评分(AUROC 0.751,95% CI 0.657-0.844)优于其他评分系统。在COVID-19患者中,使用IMV或HFNC和APACHE IV评分是住院死亡率的独立风险因素。在我们的人群中,APACHE IV 和 4C 死亡率评分对预测 ICU 和住院死亡率最有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical characteristics and mortality prediction of patients admitted to the Hong Kong East Cluster intensive care units in the COVID‐19 fifth wave
COVID‐19 has been threatening global public health since 2019. To address the overwhelming caseload, several tools were developed to predict prognosis and aid triage of critically ill patients for intensive care. Currently, there is a lack of local data on the validity of such tools.The objective of this study is to identify the predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in COVID‐19 patients in Hong Kong and externally validate the different scoring systems.A retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the HKEC ICUs from 1 January 2022 to 30 April 2022 was performed. We collected data on patient demographics, vaccination status, laboratory parameters, and clinical outcomes including need for organ support and mortality. Clinical severities were estimated by Sequential Organ Failure Score, 4C Mortality Score, COVID‐Gram score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score based on the original studies. Comparison between individual scoring systems' performance on hospital mortality was conducted and summarized.In these four months, 137 patients with COVID‐19 admitted to ICUs of Ruttonjee Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital were recruited. 64 patients (46.7%) were admitted for COVID‐19 related respiratory failure, among which mortality was 66.7%. The overall hospital and ICU mortality were 21.9% and 13.1%, respectively. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR 3.221, p 0.034), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy (OR 3.107, p 0.039), and higher APACHE IV score (OR 1.043, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of hospital mortality using multivariate analysis. The scoring systems had good performance in mortality prediction in our population. The APACHE IV score (AUROC 0.79, 95% CI 0.698–0.894) and 4C Mortality Score (AUROC 0.751, 95% CI 0.657–0.844) outperformed other scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality.In patients with COVID‐19, the use of IMV or HFNC and APACHE IV score were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The APACHE IV and the 4C Mortality Score were most useful in our population for predicting ICU and hospital mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which focusses on all aspects of clinical practice and emergency medicine research in the hospital and pre-hospital setting.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical ventilation management and airway pressure release ventilation practice in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A cross‐sectional survey of intensive care unit clinicians in mainland China Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments Questionnaire survey on point‐of‐care ultrasound utilization during cardiac arrest among emergency physicians in Hong Kong Burnout in emergency physicians in Hong Kong—A cross‐sectional study on its prevalence, associated factors, and impact Factors for predicting 28‐day mortality in older patients with suspected of having sepsis in the emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1