{"title":"对通风柜周围的速度场进行 CFD 建模:利用实验测量结果评估静态和动态网格","authors":"A. Manning , L. Qian , R. Erfani","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comparison of experimental and numerical modelling results of the velocity field around a fume cupboard with a static and a dynamic mesh. During fume cupboard testing, components are required to move which mimic typical operating conditions, the amount of tracer gas released is then measured. This tracer gas is harmful to the environment and so an alternative is required. Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques, such as dynamic meshing, have been utilised to replicate aspects of the current tests. The fume cupboard was tested in normal operating conditions and under the influence of a board inducing a wake close to the fume cupboard entrance. The velocity fields have been compared and show a reasonable level of accuracy with a percentage difference between experimental and simulated results of around 5% using both a static and a dynamic domain. This is an improvement on the 15–20% accuracy for detecting concentration of tracer gas using previous experimental methods. The aim of this work is to satisfy the scientific community and fume cupboard operators that CFD is sufficiently accurate to assess fume cupboard performance under real world scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11985,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","volume":"105 ","pages":"Pages 238-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000232/pdfft?md5=75c3e524e9b659060eb2fd9c9620d159&pid=1-s2.0-S0997754624000232-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CFD modelling of velocity fields around a fume cupboard: Evaluating static and dynamic meshes with experimental measurements\",\"authors\":\"A. Manning , L. Qian , R. Erfani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2024.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comparison of experimental and numerical modelling results of the velocity field around a fume cupboard with a static and a dynamic mesh. During fume cupboard testing, components are required to move which mimic typical operating conditions, the amount of tracer gas released is then measured. This tracer gas is harmful to the environment and so an alternative is required. Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques, such as dynamic meshing, have been utilised to replicate aspects of the current tests. The fume cupboard was tested in normal operating conditions and under the influence of a board inducing a wake close to the fume cupboard entrance. The velocity fields have been compared and show a reasonable level of accuracy with a percentage difference between experimental and simulated results of around 5% using both a static and a dynamic domain. This is an improvement on the 15–20% accuracy for detecting concentration of tracer gas using previous experimental methods. The aim of this work is to satisfy the scientific community and fume cupboard operators that CFD is sufficiently accurate to assess fume cupboard performance under real world scenarios.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 238-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000232/pdfft?md5=75c3e524e9b659060eb2fd9c9620d159&pid=1-s2.0-S0997754624000232-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000232\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
CFD modelling of velocity fields around a fume cupboard: Evaluating static and dynamic meshes with experimental measurements
This paper presents a comparison of experimental and numerical modelling results of the velocity field around a fume cupboard with a static and a dynamic mesh. During fume cupboard testing, components are required to move which mimic typical operating conditions, the amount of tracer gas released is then measured. This tracer gas is harmful to the environment and so an alternative is required. Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques, such as dynamic meshing, have been utilised to replicate aspects of the current tests. The fume cupboard was tested in normal operating conditions and under the influence of a board inducing a wake close to the fume cupboard entrance. The velocity fields have been compared and show a reasonable level of accuracy with a percentage difference between experimental and simulated results of around 5% using both a static and a dynamic domain. This is an improvement on the 15–20% accuracy for detecting concentration of tracer gas using previous experimental methods. The aim of this work is to satisfy the scientific community and fume cupboard operators that CFD is sufficiently accurate to assess fume cupboard performance under real world scenarios.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids publishes papers in all fields of fluid mechanics. Although investigations in well-established areas are within the scope of the journal, recent developments and innovative ideas are particularly welcome. Theoretical, computational and experimental papers are equally welcome. Mathematical methods, be they deterministic or stochastic, analytical or numerical, will be accepted provided they serve to clarify some identifiable problems in fluid mechanics, and provided the significance of results is explained. Similarly, experimental papers must add physical insight in to the understanding of fluid mechanics.