可持续性信息、味觉感知和支付意愿:爱鸟咖啡案例

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105124
Klaus G. Grunert , Han-Seok Seo , Di Fang , Victoria J. Hogan , Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr.
{"title":"可持续性信息、味觉感知和支付意愿:爱鸟咖啡案例","authors":"Klaus G. Grunert ,&nbsp;Han-Seok Seo ,&nbsp;Di Fang ,&nbsp;Victoria J. Hogan ,&nbsp;Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using bird-friendly coffee as an example, we investigated how sustainability information affects willingness to pay directly, to what extent this effect is mediated by taste perception and whether the effect of the sustainability information on taste perception is due to positive affect and/or due to a feeling of moral satisfaction. Stability of these effects was studied across two coffee tastings. Participants tasted two coffees prepared from two bird-friendly coffees, either after being informed about bird-friendly coffee and that the coffees they were about to taste were bird-friendly or in a control condition where tasting was blind. After each tasting, participants were asked to indicate their willingness to pay for the coffee using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak procedure. Taste perception, moral satisfaction with drinking the coffee, and affective valence were recorded using questionnaires. Emotional responses were also identified by analyzing facial expressions. Results indicated that when tasting the first coffee served, information about the bird-friendly production affected willingness to pay (WTP) positively both directly and mediated by taste perception, where the effect of the information on taste perception was in turn mediated by affect valence and moral satisfaction. When tasting the second coffee served, however, a positive impact on taste perception via increased moral satisfaction and a negative taste inference from the information resulted in a net zero effect of the information on WTP. The results provide new insights on how sustainability information can affect WTP via effects on taste perception and the dynamics of these effects over repeated choice and consumption situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000260/pdfft?md5=980ad863f4b26048e6d73fa65fdde1c7&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000260-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability information, taste perception and willingness to pay: The case of bird-friendly coffee\",\"authors\":\"Klaus G. Grunert ,&nbsp;Han-Seok Seo ,&nbsp;Di Fang ,&nbsp;Victoria J. Hogan ,&nbsp;Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using bird-friendly coffee as an example, we investigated how sustainability information affects willingness to pay directly, to what extent this effect is mediated by taste perception and whether the effect of the sustainability information on taste perception is due to positive affect and/or due to a feeling of moral satisfaction. Stability of these effects was studied across two coffee tastings. Participants tasted two coffees prepared from two bird-friendly coffees, either after being informed about bird-friendly coffee and that the coffees they were about to taste were bird-friendly or in a control condition where tasting was blind. After each tasting, participants were asked to indicate their willingness to pay for the coffee using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak procedure. Taste perception, moral satisfaction with drinking the coffee, and affective valence were recorded using questionnaires. Emotional responses were also identified by analyzing facial expressions. Results indicated that when tasting the first coffee served, information about the bird-friendly production affected willingness to pay (WTP) positively both directly and mediated by taste perception, where the effect of the information on taste perception was in turn mediated by affect valence and moral satisfaction. When tasting the second coffee served, however, a positive impact on taste perception via increased moral satisfaction and a negative taste inference from the information resulted in a net zero effect of the information on WTP. The results provide new insights on how sustainability information can affect WTP via effects on taste perception and the dynamics of these effects over repeated choice and consumption situations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000260/pdfft?md5=980ad863f4b26048e6d73fa65fdde1c7&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000260-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以爱鸟咖啡为例,我们研究了可持续发展信息如何直接影响支付意愿,这种影响在多大程度上受味觉感知的影响,以及可持续发展信息对味觉感知的影响是否源于积极情感和/或道德满足感。我们通过两次咖啡品尝来研究这些影响的稳定性。参与者品尝了由两种爱鸟咖啡配制而成的两种咖啡,在品尝之前,参与者可以先了解爱鸟咖啡以及他们即将品尝的咖啡是爱鸟咖啡,或者在盲品的对照条件下进行品尝。每次品尝后,参与者都要使用 Becker-DeGroot-Marschak 程序来表明他们是否愿意为咖啡付费。味觉感知、对饮用咖啡的道德满意度和情感价位均通过问卷调查进行记录。此外,还通过分析面部表情来确定情绪反应。结果表明,在品尝第一杯咖啡时,有关咖啡生产对鸟类友好的信息会直接对支付意愿(WTP)产生积极影响,并通过味觉感知产生中介作用,而味觉感知信息对支付意愿的影响又通过情绪价值和道德满意度产生中介作用。然而,在品尝第二杯咖啡时,道德满意度的提高对味觉感知产生了积极影响,而信息对味觉感知的负面推断导致信息对 WTP 的净影响为零。这些结果为我们提供了新的见解,即可持续性信息如何通过对味觉感知的影响来影响WTP,以及这些影响在重复选择和消费情况下的动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability information, taste perception and willingness to pay: The case of bird-friendly coffee

Using bird-friendly coffee as an example, we investigated how sustainability information affects willingness to pay directly, to what extent this effect is mediated by taste perception and whether the effect of the sustainability information on taste perception is due to positive affect and/or due to a feeling of moral satisfaction. Stability of these effects was studied across two coffee tastings. Participants tasted two coffees prepared from two bird-friendly coffees, either after being informed about bird-friendly coffee and that the coffees they were about to taste were bird-friendly or in a control condition where tasting was blind. After each tasting, participants were asked to indicate their willingness to pay for the coffee using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak procedure. Taste perception, moral satisfaction with drinking the coffee, and affective valence were recorded using questionnaires. Emotional responses were also identified by analyzing facial expressions. Results indicated that when tasting the first coffee served, information about the bird-friendly production affected willingness to pay (WTP) positively both directly and mediated by taste perception, where the effect of the information on taste perception was in turn mediated by affect valence and moral satisfaction. When tasting the second coffee served, however, a positive impact on taste perception via increased moral satisfaction and a negative taste inference from the information resulted in a net zero effect of the information on WTP. The results provide new insights on how sustainability information can affect WTP via effects on taste perception and the dynamics of these effects over repeated choice and consumption situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the role of awareness and trust in consumer purchase decisions for healthy food and products Editorial Board “I’m like, whatever you want me to be. I’m the flavor of the day”: A mixed-methods study of the food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals Advancing investigations into the effects of sweet and bitter tastes on agreeableness and hostility Diversity in gender and age, but not in race, enhances food purchase intentions in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1