Elena Tonkopi, Mercy Afadzi Tetteh, Catherine Gunn, Haseem Ashraf, Sigrid Lia Rusten, Perkhah Safi, Nora Suu Tinsoe, Kylie Colford, Olivia Ouellet, Salma Naimi, Safora Johansen
{"title":"胸部计算机断层扫描低剂量方案的多机构评估:剂量和图像质量","authors":"Elena Tonkopi, Mercy Afadzi Tetteh, Catherine Gunn, Haseem Ashraf, Sigrid Lia Rusten, Perkhah Safi, Nora Suu Tinsoe, Kylie Colford, Olivia Ouellet, Salma Naimi, Safora Johansen","doi":"10.1177/20584601241228220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose CT (LDCT) chest protocols have widespread clinical applications for many indications; as a result, there is a need for protocol assessment prior to standardization. Dalhousie University and Oslo Metropolitan University have a formally established cooperative relationship.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to assess radiation dose and image quality for LDCT chest protocols in seven different hospital locations in Norway and Canada.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>), and dose length product (DLP) from 240 average-sized patients as well as CT protocol parameters were included in the survey. Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated for each examination. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, CT number, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for three regions in the chest. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for lung parenchyma in comparison to the subcutaneous fat. Differences in dose and image quality were evaluated by a single-factor ANOVA test. A two-sample <i>t</i>-test was performed to determine differences in means between individual scanners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANOVA test revealed significant differences (<i>p</i> < .05) in dose values for all scanners, including identical scanner models. Statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < .05) were determined in mean values of the SNR distributions between the scanners in all three measured regions in the chest, as well as the CNR values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed variations in dose and image quality measurements, even within the same hospitals and between identical scanner models, indicate a potential for protocol optimization in the involved hospitals in both countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-institutional assessment of low-dose protocols in chest computed tomography: Dose and image quality.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Tonkopi, Mercy Afadzi Tetteh, Catherine Gunn, Haseem Ashraf, Sigrid Lia Rusten, Perkhah Safi, Nora Suu Tinsoe, Kylie Colford, Olivia Ouellet, Salma Naimi, Safora Johansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20584601241228220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose CT (LDCT) chest protocols have widespread clinical applications for many indications; as a result, there is a need for protocol assessment prior to standardization. Dalhousie University and Oslo Metropolitan University have a formally established cooperative relationship.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to assess radiation dose and image quality for LDCT chest protocols in seven different hospital locations in Norway and Canada.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>), and dose length product (DLP) from 240 average-sized patients as well as CT protocol parameters were included in the survey. Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated for each examination. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, CT number, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for three regions in the chest. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for lung parenchyma in comparison to the subcutaneous fat. Differences in dose and image quality were evaluated by a single-factor ANOVA test. A two-sample <i>t</i>-test was performed to determine differences in means between individual scanners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANOVA test revealed significant differences (<i>p</i> < .05) in dose values for all scanners, including identical scanner models. Statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < .05) were determined in mean values of the SNR distributions between the scanners in all three measured regions in the chest, as well as the CNR values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed variations in dose and image quality measurements, even within the same hospitals and between identical scanner models, indicate a potential for protocol optimization in the involved hospitals in both countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829498/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601241228220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601241228220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multi-institutional assessment of low-dose protocols in chest computed tomography: Dose and image quality.
Background: Low-dose CT (LDCT) chest protocols have widespread clinical applications for many indications; as a result, there is a need for protocol assessment prior to standardization. Dalhousie University and Oslo Metropolitan University have a formally established cooperative relationship.
Purpose: The purpose is to assess radiation dose and image quality for LDCT chest protocols in seven different hospital locations in Norway and Canada.
Material and methods: Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) from 240 average-sized patients as well as CT protocol parameters were included in the survey. Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated for each examination. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, CT number, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for three regions in the chest. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for lung parenchyma in comparison to the subcutaneous fat. Differences in dose and image quality were evaluated by a single-factor ANOVA test. A two-sample t-test was performed to determine differences in means between individual scanners.
Results: The ANOVA test revealed significant differences (p < .05) in dose values for all scanners, including identical scanner models. Statistically significant differences (p < .05) were determined in mean values of the SNR distributions between the scanners in all three measured regions in the chest, as well as the CNR values.
Conclusion: The observed variations in dose and image quality measurements, even within the same hospitals and between identical scanner models, indicate a potential for protocol optimization in the involved hospitals in both countries.