Michael Hetz, Stefan Babisch, Thomas Unger, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Christian Kleber
{"title":"[重新评估交通事故后紧急医疗服务部署指示目录]。","authors":"Michael Hetz, Stefan Babisch, Thomas Unger, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Christian Kleber","doi":"10.1007/s00113-023-01408-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergency physician indication catalogue is based on outdated studies and provides limited guidance for alarm criteria following traffic accidents. Advances in vehicle safety technology and changes in available resources necessitate a re-evaluation of the indications. The aim of this retrospective registry study is to identify preclinically assessable variables for severe injuries sustained in traffic accidents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 47,145 individuals involved in accidents between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 from the GIDAS database were included. Separate datasets for severe (AIS 3+) and minor injuries were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ejection (PPV 80.6%), entrapment (PPV 75.6%), burning vehicles (PPV 57.1%), challenging rescue situations (PPV 56.3%), vehicle disintegration (PPV 51.6%), and amnesia (PPV 50.3%) indicated severe injuries among vehicle occupants. For vulnerable road users (motorcyclists, cyclists, pedestrians), helmet loss (PPV 61.1%), being run over/dragging (PPV 41.9%), opponent vehicle window breakage (PPV 35.8%), and subsequent collision with objects (PPV 31.1%) were also identified. The χ<sup>2</sup>-test revealed significant associations between the variables and severe injuries. Combined variables achieved PPV values above 82%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The current emergency physician indication catalogue provides limited preclinically detectable criteria and should be revised based on the objective registry data. Query models for emergency dispatchers should be tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reassessment of the emergency medical service deployment indication catalogue after traffic accidents].\",\"authors\":\"Michael Hetz, Stefan Babisch, Thomas Unger, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Christian Kleber\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00113-023-01408-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergency physician indication catalogue is based on outdated studies and provides limited guidance for alarm criteria following traffic accidents. Advances in vehicle safety technology and changes in available resources necessitate a re-evaluation of the indications. The aim of this retrospective registry study is to identify preclinically assessable variables for severe injuries sustained in traffic accidents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 47,145 individuals involved in accidents between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 from the GIDAS database were included. Separate datasets for severe (AIS 3+) and minor injuries were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ejection (PPV 80.6%), entrapment (PPV 75.6%), burning vehicles (PPV 57.1%), challenging rescue situations (PPV 56.3%), vehicle disintegration (PPV 51.6%), and amnesia (PPV 50.3%) indicated severe injuries among vehicle occupants. For vulnerable road users (motorcyclists, cyclists, pedestrians), helmet loss (PPV 61.1%), being run over/dragging (PPV 41.9%), opponent vehicle window breakage (PPV 35.8%), and subsequent collision with objects (PPV 31.1%) were also identified. The χ<sup>2</sup>-test revealed significant associations between the variables and severe injuries. Combined variables achieved PPV values above 82%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The current emergency physician indication catalogue provides limited preclinically detectable criteria and should be revised based on the objective registry data. Query models for emergency dispatchers should be tested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058606/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-023-01408-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-023-01408-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Reassessment of the emergency medical service deployment indication catalogue after traffic accidents].
Background: The emergency physician indication catalogue is based on outdated studies and provides limited guidance for alarm criteria following traffic accidents. Advances in vehicle safety technology and changes in available resources necessitate a re-evaluation of the indications. The aim of this retrospective registry study is to identify preclinically assessable variables for severe injuries sustained in traffic accidents.
Methods: A total of 47,145 individuals involved in accidents between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 from the GIDAS database were included. Separate datasets for severe (AIS 3+) and minor injuries were evaluated.
Results: Ejection (PPV 80.6%), entrapment (PPV 75.6%), burning vehicles (PPV 57.1%), challenging rescue situations (PPV 56.3%), vehicle disintegration (PPV 51.6%), and amnesia (PPV 50.3%) indicated severe injuries among vehicle occupants. For vulnerable road users (motorcyclists, cyclists, pedestrians), helmet loss (PPV 61.1%), being run over/dragging (PPV 41.9%), opponent vehicle window breakage (PPV 35.8%), and subsequent collision with objects (PPV 31.1%) were also identified. The χ2-test revealed significant associations between the variables and severe injuries. Combined variables achieved PPV values above 82%.
Discussion: The current emergency physician indication catalogue provides limited preclinically detectable criteria and should be revised based on the objective registry data. Query models for emergency dispatchers should be tested.