{"title":"具有抗菌活性的医疗器械和生物材料的三维打印:系统综述","authors":"Manoela Almeida Martins Mace , Camila Leites Reginatto , Rosane Michele Duarte Soares , Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria","doi":"10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Medical device-associated infections pose a threat to healthcare budgets in both developed and developing countries. Over the last decade, researchers have been looking for antimicrobial biomaterials using three-dimensional (3D) printing. This systematic review<span> aims to understand the current state of the art in antimicrobial 3D-printed materials and their applications in healthcare. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct this study. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for this review. According to the inclusion criteria, 269 relevant articles were retrieved for this study. Material extrusion<span><span> was revealed to be the most commonly used 3D printing methodology for biomaterials and medical device production. Polylactic acid, </span>polycaprolactone, chitosan, and </span></span></span>alginate<span><span> were the most explored materials for this application. Besides, vancomycin and </span>gentamicin were the most prevalent antimicrobial substances loaded into 3D biomaterials. Further, </span></span><span><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></span> and <em>Escherichia coli</em><span> are the most evaluated pathogens against 3D-printed materials. In conclusion, 3D printing is an excellent tool for designing functionalized biomaterials and developing alternatives for nosocomial infections. We hope this review provides helpful insights for scientists and innovation centers to understand the potential of the 3D-printed antimicrobial materials found in this study and the demands and opportunities for further research in this area.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37770,"journal":{"name":"Bioprinting","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article e00334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional printing of medical devices and biomaterials with antimicrobial activity: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Manoela Almeida Martins Mace , Camila Leites Reginatto , Rosane Michele Duarte Soares , Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Medical device-associated infections pose a threat to healthcare budgets in both developed and developing countries. Over the last decade, researchers have been looking for antimicrobial biomaterials using three-dimensional (3D) printing. This systematic review<span> aims to understand the current state of the art in antimicrobial 3D-printed materials and their applications in healthcare. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct this study. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for this review. According to the inclusion criteria, 269 relevant articles were retrieved for this study. Material extrusion<span><span> was revealed to be the most commonly used 3D printing methodology for biomaterials and medical device production. Polylactic acid, </span>polycaprolactone, chitosan, and </span></span></span>alginate<span><span> were the most explored materials for this application. Besides, vancomycin and </span>gentamicin were the most prevalent antimicrobial substances loaded into 3D biomaterials. Further, </span></span><span><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></span> and <em>Escherichia coli</em><span> are the most evaluated pathogens against 3D-printed materials. In conclusion, 3D printing is an excellent tool for designing functionalized biomaterials and developing alternatives for nosocomial infections. We hope this review provides helpful insights for scientists and innovation centers to understand the potential of the 3D-printed antimicrobial materials found in this study and the demands and opportunities for further research in this area.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioprinting\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioprinting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240588662400006X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240588662400006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
医疗器械相关感染对发达国家和发展中国家的医疗预算都构成了威胁。过去十年来,研究人员一直在寻找使用三维(3D)打印技术的抗菌生物材料。本系统综述旨在了解抗菌三维打印材料及其在医疗保健领域的应用现状。本研究采用了系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。本研究检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库。根据纳入标准,本研究共检索到 269 篇相关文章。研究发现,材料挤出是生物材料和医疗器械生产中最常用的 3D 打印方法。聚乳酸、聚己内酯、壳聚糖和海藻酸是最常用的材料。此外,万古霉素和庆大霉素是三维生物材料中最常用的抗菌物质。此外,金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠埃希氏菌是针对三维打印材料评估最多的病原体。总之,三维打印是设计功能化生物材料和开发治疗院内感染替代品的绝佳工具。我们希望这篇综述能为科学家和创新中心提供有益的见解,帮助他们了解本研究中发现的三维打印抗菌材料的潜力,以及该领域进一步研究的需求和机遇。
Three-dimensional printing of medical devices and biomaterials with antimicrobial activity: A systematic review
Medical device-associated infections pose a threat to healthcare budgets in both developed and developing countries. Over the last decade, researchers have been looking for antimicrobial biomaterials using three-dimensional (3D) printing. This systematic review aims to understand the current state of the art in antimicrobial 3D-printed materials and their applications in healthcare. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct this study. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for this review. According to the inclusion criteria, 269 relevant articles were retrieved for this study. Material extrusion was revealed to be the most commonly used 3D printing methodology for biomaterials and medical device production. Polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, chitosan, and alginate were the most explored materials for this application. Besides, vancomycin and gentamicin were the most prevalent antimicrobial substances loaded into 3D biomaterials. Further, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli are the most evaluated pathogens against 3D-printed materials. In conclusion, 3D printing is an excellent tool for designing functionalized biomaterials and developing alternatives for nosocomial infections. We hope this review provides helpful insights for scientists and innovation centers to understand the potential of the 3D-printed antimicrobial materials found in this study and the demands and opportunities for further research in this area.
期刊介绍:
Bioprinting is a broad-spectrum, multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of 3D fabrication technology involving biological tissues, organs and cells for medical and biotechnology applications. Topics covered include nanomaterials, biomaterials, scaffolds, 3D printing technology, imaging and CAD/CAM software and hardware, post-printing bioreactor maturation, cell and biological factor patterning, biofabrication, tissue engineering and other applications of 3D bioprinting technology. Bioprinting publishes research reports describing novel results with high clinical significance in all areas of 3D bioprinting research. Bioprinting issues contain a wide variety of review and analysis articles covering topics relevant to 3D bioprinting ranging from basic biological, material and technical advances to pre-clinical and clinical applications of 3D bioprinting.