Suyeon Heo, Cindy W Yoon, Sang-Young Kim, Woo-Ram Kim, Duk L Na, Young Noh
{"title":"早发型和晚发型阿尔茨海默病结构网络效率的改变","authors":"Suyeon Heo, Cindy W Yoon, Sang-Young Kim, Woo-Ram Kim, Duk L Na, Young Noh","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2023.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) share the same neuropathological hallmarks of amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles but have distinct cognitive features. We compared structural brain connectivity between the EOAD and LOAD groups using structural network efficiency and evaluated the association of structural network efficiency with the cognitive profile and pathological markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The structural brain connectivity networks of 80 AD patients (47 with EOAD and 33 with LOAD) and 57 healthy controls were reconstructed using diffusion-tensor imaging. Graph-theoretic indices were calculated and intergroup differences were evaluated. Correlations between network parameters and neuropsychological test results were analyzed. The correlations of the amyloid and tau burdens with network parameters were evaluated for the patients and controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the age-matched control group, the EOAD patients had increased global path length and decreased global efficiency, averaged local efficiency, and averaged clustering coefficient. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the LOAD patients. Locally, the EOAD patients showed decreases in local efficiency and the clustering coefficient over a wide area compared with the control group, whereas LOAD patients showed such decreases only within a limited area. Changes in network parameters were significantly correlated with multiple cognitive domains in EOAD patients, but only with Clinical Dementia Rating Sum-of-Boxes scores in LOAD patients. Finally, the tau burden was correlated with changes in network parameters in AD signature areas in both patient groups, while there was no correlation with the amyloid burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impairment of structural network efficiency and its effects on cognition may differ between EOAD and LOAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alterations of Structural Network Efficiency in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Suyeon Heo, Cindy W Yoon, Sang-Young Kim, Woo-Ram Kim, Duk L Na, Young Noh\",\"doi\":\"10.3988/jcn.2023.0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) share the same neuropathological hallmarks of amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles but have distinct cognitive features. We compared structural brain connectivity between the EOAD and LOAD groups using structural network efficiency and evaluated the association of structural network efficiency with the cognitive profile and pathological markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The structural brain connectivity networks of 80 AD patients (47 with EOAD and 33 with LOAD) and 57 healthy controls were reconstructed using diffusion-tensor imaging. Graph-theoretic indices were calculated and intergroup differences were evaluated. Correlations between network parameters and neuropsychological test results were analyzed. The correlations of the amyloid and tau burdens with network parameters were evaluated for the patients and controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the age-matched control group, the EOAD patients had increased global path length and decreased global efficiency, averaged local efficiency, and averaged clustering coefficient. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the LOAD patients. Locally, the EOAD patients showed decreases in local efficiency and the clustering coefficient over a wide area compared with the control group, whereas LOAD patients showed such decreases only within a limited area. Changes in network parameters were significantly correlated with multiple cognitive domains in EOAD patients, but only with Clinical Dementia Rating Sum-of-Boxes scores in LOAD patients. Finally, the tau burden was correlated with changes in network parameters in AD signature areas in both patient groups, while there was no correlation with the amyloid burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impairment of structural network efficiency and its effects on cognition may differ between EOAD and LOAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076196/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2023.0092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2023.0092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:早发和晚发阿尔茨海默病(分别为EOAD和LOAD)具有相同的神经病理学特征,即淀粉样蛋白和神经纤维缠结,但却具有不同的认知特征。我们利用结构网络效率比较了EOAD组和LOAD组的大脑结构连通性,并评估了结构网络效率与阿尔茨海默病(AD)认知特征和病理标志物的关联:方法:利用扩散张量成像技术重建了80名AD患者(47名EOAD患者和33名LOAD患者)和57名健康对照者的大脑结构连接网络。计算图形理论指数并评估组间差异。分析了网络参数与神经心理学测试结果之间的相关性。评估了患者和对照组的淀粉样蛋白和 tau 负荷与网络参数的相关性:与年龄匹配的对照组相比,EOAD 患者的全局路径长度增加,全局效率、平均局部效率和平均聚类系数降低。相比之下,LOAD 患者无明显差异。从局部来看,与对照组相比,EOAD 患者的局部效率和聚类系数在很大范围内都有所下降,而 LOAD 患者仅在有限范围内出现这种下降。在EOAD患者中,网络参数的变化与多个认知领域有明显相关性,而在LOAD患者中,仅与临床痴呆评级方框总和评分有明显相关性。最后,在两组患者中,tau负荷与AD特征区域的网络参数变化相关,而与淀粉样蛋白负荷无相关性:结论:EOAD和LOAD患者的结构网络效率受损及其对认知能力的影响可能有所不同。
Alterations of Structural Network Efficiency in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.
Background and purpose: Early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) share the same neuropathological hallmarks of amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles but have distinct cognitive features. We compared structural brain connectivity between the EOAD and LOAD groups using structural network efficiency and evaluated the association of structural network efficiency with the cognitive profile and pathological markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Methods: The structural brain connectivity networks of 80 AD patients (47 with EOAD and 33 with LOAD) and 57 healthy controls were reconstructed using diffusion-tensor imaging. Graph-theoretic indices were calculated and intergroup differences were evaluated. Correlations between network parameters and neuropsychological test results were analyzed. The correlations of the amyloid and tau burdens with network parameters were evaluated for the patients and controls.
Results: Compared with the age-matched control group, the EOAD patients had increased global path length and decreased global efficiency, averaged local efficiency, and averaged clustering coefficient. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the LOAD patients. Locally, the EOAD patients showed decreases in local efficiency and the clustering coefficient over a wide area compared with the control group, whereas LOAD patients showed such decreases only within a limited area. Changes in network parameters were significantly correlated with multiple cognitive domains in EOAD patients, but only with Clinical Dementia Rating Sum-of-Boxes scores in LOAD patients. Finally, the tau burden was correlated with changes in network parameters in AD signature areas in both patient groups, while there was no correlation with the amyloid burden.
Conclusions: The impairment of structural network efficiency and its effects on cognition may differ between EOAD and LOAD.
期刊介绍:
The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.