Nadim J. Hallab, Salem R. Hallab, Anastasia Alexander, Robin Pourzal
{"title":"包装髋关节置换术柄上残留碎片的特征表明,小于 10 μm 大小的微粒占主导地位:骨科植入物的最新 USP788 指南。","authors":"Nadim J. Hallab, Salem R. Hallab, Anastasia Alexander, Robin Pourzal","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past evaluation of particle contamination on packaged implants has typically been conducted using US Pharmacopeia (USP) 788, a 1970s pharmaceutical guideline created to evaluate contaminant particles in injectable fluids and syringes. Our objective was to reestablish relevant acceptance criteria for residual orthopedic and other implant debris, including smaller particles (i.e., <10 μm in diameter). Packaged total hip arthroplasty (THA) titanium (Ti6Al4V)-alloy femoral stems were used (hydroxyapatite [HA]-coated and non-coated stems). Short-term ultrasonication and longer-term 24-hour soak/agitation methods were used to elute surface-bound contaminant particles, and released particles were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, image analysis, and particle characterization. For HA-coated THA-stems, >99% of eluted particles were calcium phosphate. For plain non-coated THA-stems, >99% of eluted particles were titanium-alloy-based. The number-based median size of particles in both groups was approximately 1.5 μm in diameter despite being composed of different materials. The total volume of particulate removed from HA-coated stems was 0.037 mm<sup>3</sup> (671 × 10<sup>3</sup> particles total), which was approximately >50-fold more volume than that on plain non-coated stems at 0.0006 mm<sup>3</sup> (89 × 10<sup>3</sup> particles total). Only non-coated THA stems passed reestablished USP788 acceptance criteria, compared by using equivalent total volumes of contaminant particulate within new and legacy guideline ranges of >10 and >25 μm ECD, that is, <1.0 × 10<sup>7</sup> particles for <1 μm diameter in size, <600,000 for <1–10 μm, <6000 for 10–25 μm and <600 for >25 μm. These results fill a knowledge gap on how much residual debris can be expected to exist on packaged implants and can be used as a basis for updating acceptance criteria (i.e., termed USP788-Implant [USP788-I]). Residual implant particulate assessment is critical given the increasing implant complexity and new manufacturing techniques (e.g., additive manufacturing).</p>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35387","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of residual debris on packaged hip arthroplasty stems demonstrates the dominance of less than 10 μm sized particulate: Updated USP788 guidelines for orthopedic implants\",\"authors\":\"Nadim J. Hallab, Salem R. Hallab, Anastasia Alexander, Robin Pourzal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbm.b.35387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Past evaluation of particle contamination on packaged implants has typically been conducted using US Pharmacopeia (USP) 788, a 1970s pharmaceutical guideline created to evaluate contaminant particles in injectable fluids and syringes. Our objective was to reestablish relevant acceptance criteria for residual orthopedic and other implant debris, including smaller particles (i.e., <10 μm in diameter). Packaged total hip arthroplasty (THA) titanium (Ti6Al4V)-alloy femoral stems were used (hydroxyapatite [HA]-coated and non-coated stems). Short-term ultrasonication and longer-term 24-hour soak/agitation methods were used to elute surface-bound contaminant particles, and released particles were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, image analysis, and particle characterization. For HA-coated THA-stems, >99% of eluted particles were calcium phosphate. For plain non-coated THA-stems, >99% of eluted particles were titanium-alloy-based. The number-based median size of particles in both groups was approximately 1.5 μm in diameter despite being composed of different materials. The total volume of particulate removed from HA-coated stems was 0.037 mm<sup>3</sup> (671 × 10<sup>3</sup> particles total), which was approximately >50-fold more volume than that on plain non-coated stems at 0.0006 mm<sup>3</sup> (89 × 10<sup>3</sup> particles total). Only non-coated THA stems passed reestablished USP788 acceptance criteria, compared by using equivalent total volumes of contaminant particulate within new and legacy guideline ranges of >10 and >25 μm ECD, that is, <1.0 × 10<sup>7</sup> particles for <1 μm diameter in size, <600,000 for <1–10 μm, <6000 for 10–25 μm and <600 for >25 μm. These results fill a knowledge gap on how much residual debris can be expected to exist on packaged implants and can be used as a basis for updating acceptance criteria (i.e., termed USP788-Implant [USP788-I]). Residual implant particulate assessment is critical given the increasing implant complexity and new manufacturing techniques (e.g., additive manufacturing).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35387\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35387\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characterization of residual debris on packaged hip arthroplasty stems demonstrates the dominance of less than 10 μm sized particulate: Updated USP788 guidelines for orthopedic implants
Past evaluation of particle contamination on packaged implants has typically been conducted using US Pharmacopeia (USP) 788, a 1970s pharmaceutical guideline created to evaluate contaminant particles in injectable fluids and syringes. Our objective was to reestablish relevant acceptance criteria for residual orthopedic and other implant debris, including smaller particles (i.e., <10 μm in diameter). Packaged total hip arthroplasty (THA) titanium (Ti6Al4V)-alloy femoral stems were used (hydroxyapatite [HA]-coated and non-coated stems). Short-term ultrasonication and longer-term 24-hour soak/agitation methods were used to elute surface-bound contaminant particles, and released particles were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, image analysis, and particle characterization. For HA-coated THA-stems, >99% of eluted particles were calcium phosphate. For plain non-coated THA-stems, >99% of eluted particles were titanium-alloy-based. The number-based median size of particles in both groups was approximately 1.5 μm in diameter despite being composed of different materials. The total volume of particulate removed from HA-coated stems was 0.037 mm3 (671 × 103 particles total), which was approximately >50-fold more volume than that on plain non-coated stems at 0.0006 mm3 (89 × 103 particles total). Only non-coated THA stems passed reestablished USP788 acceptance criteria, compared by using equivalent total volumes of contaminant particulate within new and legacy guideline ranges of >10 and >25 μm ECD, that is, <1.0 × 107 particles for <1 μm diameter in size, <600,000 for <1–10 μm, <6000 for 10–25 μm and <600 for >25 μm. These results fill a knowledge gap on how much residual debris can be expected to exist on packaged implants and can be used as a basis for updating acceptance criteria (i.e., termed USP788-Implant [USP788-I]). Residual implant particulate assessment is critical given the increasing implant complexity and new manufacturing techniques (e.g., additive manufacturing).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats:
• original research reports
• short research and development reports
• scientific reviews
• current concepts articles
• special reports
• editorials
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.