HistoriView:使用可扩展的空间效率时间轴(无需缩放互动)查看病人的新方法的实施和评估。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1055/a-2269-0995
Heekyong Park, Taowei David Wang, Nich Wattanasin, Victor M Castro, Vivian Gainer, Shawn Murphy
{"title":"HistoriView:使用可扩展的空间效率时间轴(无需缩放互动)查看病人的新方法的实施和评估。","authors":"Heekyong Park, Taowei David Wang, Nich Wattanasin, Victor M Castro, Vivian Gainer, Shawn Murphy","doi":"10.1055/a-2269-0995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Timelines have been used for patient review. While maintaining a compact overview is important, merged event representations caused by the intricate and voluminous patient data bring event recognition, access ambiguity, and inefficient interaction problems. Handling large patient data efficiently is another challenge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aims to develop a scalable, efficient timeline to enhance patient review for research purposes. The focus is on addressing the challenges presented by the intricate and voluminous patient data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We propose a high-throughput, space-efficient HistoriView timeline for an individual patient. For a compact overview, it uses nonstacking event representation. An overlay detection algorithm, y-shift visualization, and popup-based interaction facilitate comprehensive analysis of overlapping datasets. An i2b2 HistoriView plugin was deployed, using split query and event reduction approaches, delivering the entire history efficiently without losing information. For evaluation, 11 participants completed a usability survey and a preference survey, followed by qualitative feedback. To evaluate scalability, 100 randomly selected patients over 60 years old were tested on the plugin and were compared with a baseline visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Most participants found that HistoriView was easy to use and learn and delivered information clearly without zooming. All preferred HistoriView over a stacked timeline. They expressed satisfaction on display, ease of learning and use, and efficiency. However, challenges and suggestions for improvement were also identified. In the performance test, the largest patient had 32,630 records, which exceeds the baseline limit. HistoriView reduced it to 2,019 visual artifacts. All patients were pulled and visualized within 45.40 seconds. Visualization took less than 3 seconds for all.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong> HistoriView allows complete data exploration without exhaustive interactions in a compact overview. It is useful for dense data or iterative comparisons. However, issues in exploring subconcept records were reported. HistoriView handles large patient data preserving original information in a reasonable time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HistoriView: Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Review a Patient Using a Scalable Space-Efficient Timeline without Zoom Interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Heekyong Park, Taowei David Wang, Nich Wattanasin, Victor M Castro, Vivian Gainer, Shawn Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2269-0995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Timelines have been used for patient review. While maintaining a compact overview is important, merged event representations caused by the intricate and voluminous patient data bring event recognition, access ambiguity, and inefficient interaction problems. Handling large patient data efficiently is another challenge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aims to develop a scalable, efficient timeline to enhance patient review for research purposes. The focus is on addressing the challenges presented by the intricate and voluminous patient data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We propose a high-throughput, space-efficient HistoriView timeline for an individual patient. For a compact overview, it uses nonstacking event representation. An overlay detection algorithm, y-shift visualization, and popup-based interaction facilitate comprehensive analysis of overlapping datasets. An i2b2 HistoriView plugin was deployed, using split query and event reduction approaches, delivering the entire history efficiently without losing information. For evaluation, 11 participants completed a usability survey and a preference survey, followed by qualitative feedback. To evaluate scalability, 100 randomly selected patients over 60 years old were tested on the plugin and were compared with a baseline visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Most participants found that HistoriView was easy to use and learn and delivered information clearly without zooming. All preferred HistoriView over a stacked timeline. They expressed satisfaction on display, ease of learning and use, and efficiency. However, challenges and suggestions for improvement were also identified. In the performance test, the largest patient had 32,630 records, which exceeds the baseline limit. HistoriView reduced it to 2,019 visual artifacts. All patients were pulled and visualized within 45.40 seconds. Visualization took less than 3 seconds for all.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong> HistoriView allows complete data exploration without exhaustive interactions in a compact overview. It is useful for dense data or iterative comparisons. However, issues in exploring subconcept records were reported. HistoriView handles large patient data preserving original information in a reasonable time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990596/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2269-0995\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2269-0995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:时间轴一直被用于患者复查。虽然保持紧凑的概览非常重要,但错综复杂的大量患者数据所造成的合并事件表示法会带来事件识别、访问模糊和交互效率低下等问题。高效处理大量患者数据是另一个挑战:本研究旨在开发一种可扩展的高效时间轴,以加强研究目的的患者审查。重点是解决错综复杂的大量患者数据带来的挑战:我们为单个患者提出了一种高吞吐量、空间效率高的 HistoriView 时间轴。为了实现紧凑的概览,它采用了非堆叠事件表示法。叠加检测算法、y-shift 可视化和基于弹出式的交互有助于对重叠数据集进行全面分析。i2b2 HistoriView 插件采用了拆分查询和事件缩减的方法,可在不丢失信息的情况下高效提供整个病史。在评估过程中,11 名参与者完成了可用性调查和偏好调查,并获得了定性反馈。为了评估可扩展性,随机选取了100名60岁以上的患者进行了插件测试,并与基线可视化进行了比较:结果:大多数参与者认为HistoriView易于使用和学习,无需缩放即可清晰地传递信息。与堆叠式时间轴相比,所有人都更喜欢 HistoriView。他们对显示效果、易学易用性和效率表示满意。不过,他们也提出了一些挑战和改进建议。在性能测试中,最大的病人有 32,630 条记录,超过了基线限制。HistoriView 将其减少到 2,019 条可视化记录。所有病人的提取和可视化都在 45.40 秒内完成。讨论与结论HistoriView 允许在紧凑的概览中进行完整的数据探索,而无需进行详尽的交互。它对于密集数据或迭代比较非常有用。不过,有报告称在探索子概念记录方面存在问题。HistoriView 可以在合理的时间内处理大量患者数据,并保留原始信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HistoriView: Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Review a Patient Using a Scalable Space-Efficient Timeline without Zoom Interactions.

Background:  Timelines have been used for patient review. While maintaining a compact overview is important, merged event representations caused by the intricate and voluminous patient data bring event recognition, access ambiguity, and inefficient interaction problems. Handling large patient data efficiently is another challenge.

Objective:  This study aims to develop a scalable, efficient timeline to enhance patient review for research purposes. The focus is on addressing the challenges presented by the intricate and voluminous patient data.

Methods:  We propose a high-throughput, space-efficient HistoriView timeline for an individual patient. For a compact overview, it uses nonstacking event representation. An overlay detection algorithm, y-shift visualization, and popup-based interaction facilitate comprehensive analysis of overlapping datasets. An i2b2 HistoriView plugin was deployed, using split query and event reduction approaches, delivering the entire history efficiently without losing information. For evaluation, 11 participants completed a usability survey and a preference survey, followed by qualitative feedback. To evaluate scalability, 100 randomly selected patients over 60 years old were tested on the plugin and were compared with a baseline visualization.

Results:  Most participants found that HistoriView was easy to use and learn and delivered information clearly without zooming. All preferred HistoriView over a stacked timeline. They expressed satisfaction on display, ease of learning and use, and efficiency. However, challenges and suggestions for improvement were also identified. In the performance test, the largest patient had 32,630 records, which exceeds the baseline limit. HistoriView reduced it to 2,019 visual artifacts. All patients were pulled and visualized within 45.40 seconds. Visualization took less than 3 seconds for all.

Discussion and conclusion:  HistoriView allows complete data exploration without exhaustive interactions in a compact overview. It is useful for dense data or iterative comparisons. However, issues in exploring subconcept records were reported. HistoriView handles large patient data preserving original information in a reasonable time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review. A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform. Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders. Special Issue on Informatics Education A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation. Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1