体力活动和体能在预测欧洲中年男子全因死亡率和死亡年龄中的作用,该研究对欧洲中年男子群体进行了长达 60 年的跟踪调查。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae064
Alessandro Menotti, Paolo Emilio Puddu, Johanna M Geleijnse, Anthony Kafatos, Hanna Tolonen
{"title":"体力活动和体能在预测欧洲中年男子全因死亡率和死亡年龄中的作用,该研究对欧洲中年男子群体进行了长达 60 年的跟踪调查。","authors":"Alessandro Menotti, Paolo Emilio Puddu, Johanna M Geleijnse, Anthony Kafatos, Hanna Tolonen","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A study of the power of physical activity (Phyac) and physical fitness (Fitscore) in predicting very long-term all-cause mortality and age at death (AD) is missing.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 5482 middle-aged men were examined with measurement of several risk factors and followed for 60 years until the virtual extinction of cohorts. Phyac in three classes was estimated from their type of work while Fitscore was derived from the linear combinations of levels of arm circumference, heart rate, and vital capacity computed as a factor score by principal components analysis. The predictive power of these characteristics (adjusted for five traditional cardiovascular risk factors) was made by Cox models (for all-cause mortality) and multiple linear regression models (for AD). Single levels of the three indicators of fitness were highly related to the three levels of Phyac and of Fitscore. High levels of both Phyac and of Fitscore forced into the same models were associated with lower all-cause mortality and higher AD. The predictive power of Fitscore was systematically better than that of Phyac. Hazard ratios (high vs. low) for all-cause mortality were 0.85 (Phyac) and 0.70 (Fitscore). The coefficients (all significant) were 2.25 years (Phyac) and 3.79 of AD by Fitscore. Fitscore was independently and significantly predictive of all-cause mortality for both the first and second 30-year follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phyac and Fitscore are related, and both showed important predictive power for all-cause mortality and AD. The role of Fitscore was more powerful, and both characteristics seem to be expressions of health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical activity and physical fitness in prediction of all-cause mortality and age at death in European extinct cohorts of middle-aged men followed for 60 years.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Menotti, Paolo Emilio Puddu, Johanna M Geleijnse, Anthony Kafatos, Hanna Tolonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A study of the power of physical activity (Phyac) and physical fitness (Fitscore) in predicting very long-term all-cause mortality and age at death (AD) is missing.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 5482 middle-aged men were examined with measurement of several risk factors and followed for 60 years until the virtual extinction of cohorts. Phyac in three classes was estimated from their type of work while Fitscore was derived from the linear combinations of levels of arm circumference, heart rate, and vital capacity computed as a factor score by principal components analysis. The predictive power of these characteristics (adjusted for five traditional cardiovascular risk factors) was made by Cox models (for all-cause mortality) and multiple linear regression models (for AD). Single levels of the three indicators of fitness were highly related to the three levels of Phyac and of Fitscore. High levels of both Phyac and of Fitscore forced into the same models were associated with lower all-cause mortality and higher AD. The predictive power of Fitscore was systematically better than that of Phyac. Hazard ratios (high vs. low) for all-cause mortality were 0.85 (Phyac) and 0.70 (Fitscore). The coefficients (all significant) were 2.25 years (Phyac) and 3.79 of AD by Fitscore. Fitscore was independently and significantly predictive of all-cause mortality for both the first and second 30-year follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phyac and Fitscore are related, and both showed important predictive power for all-cause mortality and AD. The role of Fitscore was more powerful, and both characteristics seem to be expressions of health status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺乏对体力活动(Phyac)和体能(Fitscore)预测长期全因死亡率和死亡年龄(AD)能力的研究:目前还缺少一项关于体力活动(Phyac)和体能(Fitscore)在预测长期全因死亡率和死亡年龄(AD)方面作用的研究:方法:共对 5482 名中年男子进行了检查,测量了几种风险因素,并对他们进行了长达 60 年的跟踪调查,直到队列实际上消失为止。Phyac分为3个等级,根据他们的工作类型进行估算,而Fitscore则来自臂围、心率和生命容量水平的线性组合,通过主成分分析计算为因子得分。通过 Cox 模型(针对全因死亡率)和多元线性回归模型(针对注意力缺失症)对这些特征(根据 5 个传统心血管风险因素进行调整)进行了预测:3 项体能指标的单项水平与 Phyac 和 Fitscore 的 3 项水平高度相关。将高水平的 Phyac 和 Fitscore 强加到同一模型中,会导致较低的全因死亡率和较高的注意力缺失率。Fitscore的预测能力明显优于Phyac。全因死亡率的危险比(高与低)分别为 0.85(Phyac)和 0.70(Fitscore)。系数(均显著)为 2.25 年(Phyac)和 3.79 AD(Fitscore)。在第一个和第二个30年随访期内,Fitscore对全因死亡率具有独立和显著的预测作用:结论:Phyac 和 Fitscore 是相关的,两者对全因死亡率和注意力缺失症都有重要的预测作用。Fitscore的作用更强,这两个特征似乎都是健康状况的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical activity and physical fitness in prediction of all-cause mortality and age at death in European extinct cohorts of middle-aged men followed for 60 years.

Aims: A study of the power of physical activity (Phyac) and physical fitness (Fitscore) in predicting very long-term all-cause mortality and age at death (AD) is missing.

Methods and results: A total of 5482 middle-aged men were examined with measurement of several risk factors and followed for 60 years until the virtual extinction of cohorts. Phyac in three classes was estimated from their type of work while Fitscore was derived from the linear combinations of levels of arm circumference, heart rate, and vital capacity computed as a factor score by principal components analysis. The predictive power of these characteristics (adjusted for five traditional cardiovascular risk factors) was made by Cox models (for all-cause mortality) and multiple linear regression models (for AD). Single levels of the three indicators of fitness were highly related to the three levels of Phyac and of Fitscore. High levels of both Phyac and of Fitscore forced into the same models were associated with lower all-cause mortality and higher AD. The predictive power of Fitscore was systematically better than that of Phyac. Hazard ratios (high vs. low) for all-cause mortality were 0.85 (Phyac) and 0.70 (Fitscore). The coefficients (all significant) were 2.25 years (Phyac) and 3.79 of AD by Fitscore. Fitscore was independently and significantly predictive of all-cause mortality for both the first and second 30-year follow-up periods.

Conclusion: Phyac and Fitscore are related, and both showed important predictive power for all-cause mortality and AD. The role of Fitscore was more powerful, and both characteristics seem to be expressions of health status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050. EJPC @ a glance: focus issue on cardiovascular risk prediction in primary and secondary prevention. Effect of Behavior-change Interventions on Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: The OPTIMA Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Cardiovascular risk estimation: can a risk prediction model derived in one country be used in another? Electrocardiographic and morphological cardiac remodeling in competitive female athletes - a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1