在生态多样性的杜鹃花属中,叶片习性和植物结构整合了整株植物的经济性,并将性状与气候的关系背景化

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1093/aobpla/plae005
Juliana S Medeiros, Jean H Burns, Callie Dowrey, Fiona Duong, Sarah Speroff
{"title":"在生态多样性的杜鹃花属中,叶片习性和植物结构整合了整株植物的经济性,并将性状与气候的关系背景化","authors":"Juliana S Medeiros, Jean H Burns, Callie Dowrey, Fiona Duong, Sarah Speroff","doi":"10.1093/aobpla/plae005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Rationale Plant resource strategies negotiate a trade-off between fast growth and stress resistance, characterized by specific leaf area (SLA). How SLA relates to leaf structure and function, or plant climate associations remains open for debate, and leaf habit and plant architecture may alter the costs versus benefits of individual traits. Methods We used Phylogenetic Canonical Correspondence analysis and Phylogenetic Least Squares to understand the relationship of anatomy and gas exchange to published data on root, wood, architectural and leaf economics traits, and climate. Key results Leaf anatomy was structured by leaf habit and carbon to nitrogen ratio was a better predictor of gas exchange than SLA. We found significant correspondence of leaf anatomy with branch architecture and wood traits, gas exchange corresponded with climate, while leaf economics corresponded with climate, architecture, wood, and root traits. Species from the most seasonal climates had the highest trait-climate correspondence, and different aspects of economics and anatomy reflected leaf carbon uptake versus water use. Main conclusion Our study using phylogenetic comparative methods including plant architecture and leaf habit provides insight into the mechanism of whole-plant functional coordination and contextualizes individual traits in relation to climate, demonstrating the evolutionary and ecological relevance of trait-trait correlations within a genus with high biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaf habit and plant architecture integrate whole-plant economics and contextualize trait-climate associations within ecologically diverse genus Rhododendron\",\"authors\":\"Juliana S Medeiros, Jean H Burns, Callie Dowrey, Fiona Duong, Sarah Speroff\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aobpla/plae005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Rationale Plant resource strategies negotiate a trade-off between fast growth and stress resistance, characterized by specific leaf area (SLA). How SLA relates to leaf structure and function, or plant climate associations remains open for debate, and leaf habit and plant architecture may alter the costs versus benefits of individual traits. Methods We used Phylogenetic Canonical Correspondence analysis and Phylogenetic Least Squares to understand the relationship of anatomy and gas exchange to published data on root, wood, architectural and leaf economics traits, and climate. Key results Leaf anatomy was structured by leaf habit and carbon to nitrogen ratio was a better predictor of gas exchange than SLA. We found significant correspondence of leaf anatomy with branch architecture and wood traits, gas exchange corresponded with climate, while leaf economics corresponded with climate, architecture, wood, and root traits. Species from the most seasonal climates had the highest trait-climate correspondence, and different aspects of economics and anatomy reflected leaf carbon uptake versus water use. Main conclusion Our study using phylogenetic comparative methods including plant architecture and leaf habit provides insight into the mechanism of whole-plant functional coordination and contextualizes individual traits in relation to climate, demonstrating the evolutionary and ecological relevance of trait-trait correlations within a genus with high biodiversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plae005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plae005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 理论依据 植物资源战略在快速生长和抗逆性之间进行权衡,具体表现为比叶面积(SLA)。SLA 与叶片结构和功能或植物气候的关系如何仍有待商榷,叶片习性和植物结构可能会改变单个性状的成本与收益。方法 我们使用系统进化卡农对应分析和系统进化最小二乘法来了解解剖学和气体交换与已发表的根、木材、建筑和叶片经济学性状以及气候数据之间的关系。主要结果 叶片解剖结构由叶片习性决定,碳氮比比 SLA 更能预测气体交换。我们发现叶片解剖与枝干结构和木材性状有明显的对应关系,气体交换与气候有对应关系,而叶片经济性与气候、结构、木材和根系性状有对应关系。气候季节性最强的物种的性状与气候的对应性最高,经济性和解剖学的不同方面反映了叶片对碳的吸收和对水的利用。主要结论 我们的研究采用了包括植物结构和叶片习性在内的系统进化比较方法,深入探讨了植物整体功能协调的机制,并将个体性状与气候联系起来,证明了生物多样性较高的植物属中性状-性状相关性在进化和生态学方面的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leaf habit and plant architecture integrate whole-plant economics and contextualize trait-climate associations within ecologically diverse genus Rhododendron
Summary Rationale Plant resource strategies negotiate a trade-off between fast growth and stress resistance, characterized by specific leaf area (SLA). How SLA relates to leaf structure and function, or plant climate associations remains open for debate, and leaf habit and plant architecture may alter the costs versus benefits of individual traits. Methods We used Phylogenetic Canonical Correspondence analysis and Phylogenetic Least Squares to understand the relationship of anatomy and gas exchange to published data on root, wood, architectural and leaf economics traits, and climate. Key results Leaf anatomy was structured by leaf habit and carbon to nitrogen ratio was a better predictor of gas exchange than SLA. We found significant correspondence of leaf anatomy with branch architecture and wood traits, gas exchange corresponded with climate, while leaf economics corresponded with climate, architecture, wood, and root traits. Species from the most seasonal climates had the highest trait-climate correspondence, and different aspects of economics and anatomy reflected leaf carbon uptake versus water use. Main conclusion Our study using phylogenetic comparative methods including plant architecture and leaf habit provides insight into the mechanism of whole-plant functional coordination and contextualizes individual traits in relation to climate, demonstrating the evolutionary and ecological relevance of trait-trait correlations within a genus with high biodiversity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1