Lisa Ambrosi, Vanessa Berger, Georg Rainer, Nikolaus Obojes, Ulrike Tappeiner, Erich Tasser, Georg Leitinger
{"title":"阿尔卑斯草原蒸散量的时空变化及其生物和非生物驱动因素","authors":"Lisa Ambrosi, Vanessa Berger, Georg Rainer, Nikolaus Obojes, Ulrike Tappeiner, Erich Tasser, Georg Leitinger","doi":"10.1002/eco.2633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To gain a deeper understanding of the water balances of Alpine grassland ecosystems, it is crucial to know the abiotic and biotic drivers of evapotranspiration. The abiotic drivers are very heterogeneous in mountain regions because elevation, slope and aspect control incoming R<sub>s</sub>, and atmospheric layering affect air temperature, humidity and wind distribution. In a study with 24 lysimeter plots distributed over a study area of approx. 300 km<sup>2</sup> in the Eastern Alps, we covered a wide range of topographic conditions. We investigated the effects of abiotic drivers on evapotranspiration by measuring evaporation from a free-water body (E<sub>w</sub>). For the biological modulation of crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>c</sub>), we analysed two different grassland types (at peak biomass and at low biomass) and calculated the respective crop coefficients (K<sub>c</sub>). Results showed that primarily physical drivers such as the accumulated solar radiation from sunrise to measurement (R<sub>s</sub>_acc), followed by atmospheric pressure (P), wind speed (u) and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) influence both E<sub>w</sub> and ET<sub>c</sub>. Moreover, ET<sub>c</sub> is also significantly influenced by standing biomass and the grassland type (i.e., resource use strategies of the vegetation types) and by the geographic location along the valley (i.e., entrance, middle and head of the valley). We suppose plant stress and/or ground winds to be the underlying factor for the significance of the geographic location, yet further research is needed. The current study helps towards a better understanding of the water balance in alpine grassland ecosystems, but we also show that some spatial drivers cannot yet be adequately addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.2633","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatiotemporal variability of evapotranspiration in Alpine grasslands and its biotic and abiotic drivers\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Ambrosi, Vanessa Berger, Georg Rainer, Nikolaus Obojes, Ulrike Tappeiner, Erich Tasser, Georg Leitinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.2633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To gain a deeper understanding of the water balances of Alpine grassland ecosystems, it is crucial to know the abiotic and biotic drivers of evapotranspiration. The abiotic drivers are very heterogeneous in mountain regions because elevation, slope and aspect control incoming R<sub>s</sub>, and atmospheric layering affect air temperature, humidity and wind distribution. In a study with 24 lysimeter plots distributed over a study area of approx. 300 km<sup>2</sup> in the Eastern Alps, we covered a wide range of topographic conditions. We investigated the effects of abiotic drivers on evapotranspiration by measuring evaporation from a free-water body (E<sub>w</sub>). For the biological modulation of crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>c</sub>), we analysed two different grassland types (at peak biomass and at low biomass) and calculated the respective crop coefficients (K<sub>c</sub>). Results showed that primarily physical drivers such as the accumulated solar radiation from sunrise to measurement (R<sub>s</sub>_acc), followed by atmospheric pressure (P), wind speed (u) and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) influence both E<sub>w</sub> and ET<sub>c</sub>. Moreover, ET<sub>c</sub> is also significantly influenced by standing biomass and the grassland type (i.e., resource use strategies of the vegetation types) and by the geographic location along the valley (i.e., entrance, middle and head of the valley). We suppose plant stress and/or ground winds to be the underlying factor for the significance of the geographic location, yet further research is needed. The current study helps towards a better understanding of the water balance in alpine grassland ecosystems, but we also show that some spatial drivers cannot yet be adequately addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.2633\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2633\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
要深入了解高山草地生态系统的水分平衡,了解蒸散的非生物和生物驱动因素至关重要。高山地区的非生物驱动因素非常复杂,因为海拔、坡度和坡向控制着降水量,大气分层影响着气温、湿度和风的分布。在东阿尔卑斯山约 300 平方公里的研究区域内分布着 24 个温度计地块,涵盖了广泛的地形条件。我们通过测量自由水体(Ew)的蒸发量,研究了非生物驱动因素对蒸散量的影响。对于作物蒸散量(ETc)的生物调节作用,我们分析了两种不同的草地类型(生物量高峰期和生物量低谷期),并计算了各自的作物系数(Kc)。结果表明,影响 Ew 和 ETc 的主要物理驱动因素是日出至测量期间累积的太阳辐射(Rs_acc),其次是大气压力(P)、风速(u)和蒸汽压力损失(VPD)。此外,立地生物量和草地类型(即植被类型的资源利用策略)以及沿山谷的地理位置(即谷口、谷中和谷底)也对蒸散发有显著影响。我们认为植物胁迫和/或地面风是地理位置重要性的根本因素,但这还需要进一步研究。目前的研究有助于更好地理解高寒草地生态系统的水分平衡,但我们也发现一些空间驱动因素尚未得到充分解决。
Spatiotemporal variability of evapotranspiration in Alpine grasslands and its biotic and abiotic drivers
To gain a deeper understanding of the water balances of Alpine grassland ecosystems, it is crucial to know the abiotic and biotic drivers of evapotranspiration. The abiotic drivers are very heterogeneous in mountain regions because elevation, slope and aspect control incoming Rs, and atmospheric layering affect air temperature, humidity and wind distribution. In a study with 24 lysimeter plots distributed over a study area of approx. 300 km2 in the Eastern Alps, we covered a wide range of topographic conditions. We investigated the effects of abiotic drivers on evapotranspiration by measuring evaporation from a free-water body (Ew). For the biological modulation of crop evapotranspiration (ETc), we analysed two different grassland types (at peak biomass and at low biomass) and calculated the respective crop coefficients (Kc). Results showed that primarily physical drivers such as the accumulated solar radiation from sunrise to measurement (Rs_acc), followed by atmospheric pressure (P), wind speed (u) and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) influence both Ew and ETc. Moreover, ETc is also significantly influenced by standing biomass and the grassland type (i.e., resource use strategies of the vegetation types) and by the geographic location along the valley (i.e., entrance, middle and head of the valley). We suppose plant stress and/or ground winds to be the underlying factor for the significance of the geographic location, yet further research is needed. The current study helps towards a better understanding of the water balance in alpine grassland ecosystems, but we also show that some spatial drivers cannot yet be adequately addressed.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.