白内障手术后干眼症的眼表分析

W. Tangpagasit, Onnicha Srivanich
{"title":"白内障手术后干眼症的眼表分析","authors":"W. Tangpagasit, Onnicha Srivanich","doi":"10.1097/coa.0000000000000027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran (HPMC/Dextran) and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) in postcataract surgery patients by analyzing the presurgery and postsurgery ocular surface.\n \n \n \n This double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled 96 patients with ocular surface dysfunction, specifically DED, after phacoemulsification. Patients were randomized to receive either HPMC/Dextran (n = 56) or 0.3% SH (n = 40). All patients received 1 drop per eye, 4 times per day. Data from OCULUS Keratograph 5M and Schirmer I tests without anesthesia were collected at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.\n \n \n \n Three months postsurgery, the ocular surface, Schirmer I test, tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive tear film break-up time (NITBUT), meibography, redness, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were significantly improved. The Schirmer I test, TMH, and NITBUT improved significantly (P = 0.07, 0.17, and 0.43, respectively; analysis of variance, P < 0.05) in the SH group compared with the HPMC/Dextran group. In a subgroup analysis of patients with severe dry eye, Schirmer I test ≤ 5 mm/5 minutes and NITBUT < 5 significantly improved (P = 0.00 and 0.001, respectively) at 3 months in the SH group compared with the HPMC/Dextran group. Thus, 0.3% SH gave significantly superior tear secretion and tear film instability outcomes.\n \n \n \n Both types of preservative-free artificial tears are effective in treating postsurgery DED. Compared with HPMC/Dextran, 0.3% SH artificial tears showed more improvements in Schirmer I test and NITBUT postsurgery.\n","PeriodicalId":503185,"journal":{"name":"Cornea Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ocular Surface Analysis of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery\",\"authors\":\"W. Tangpagasit, Onnicha Srivanich\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/coa.0000000000000027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran (HPMC/Dextran) and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) in postcataract surgery patients by analyzing the presurgery and postsurgery ocular surface.\\n \\n \\n \\n This double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled 96 patients with ocular surface dysfunction, specifically DED, after phacoemulsification. Patients were randomized to receive either HPMC/Dextran (n = 56) or 0.3% SH (n = 40). All patients received 1 drop per eye, 4 times per day. Data from OCULUS Keratograph 5M and Schirmer I tests without anesthesia were collected at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.\\n \\n \\n \\n Three months postsurgery, the ocular surface, Schirmer I test, tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive tear film break-up time (NITBUT), meibography, redness, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were significantly improved. The Schirmer I test, TMH, and NITBUT improved significantly (P = 0.07, 0.17, and 0.43, respectively; analysis of variance, P < 0.05) in the SH group compared with the HPMC/Dextran group. In a subgroup analysis of patients with severe dry eye, Schirmer I test ≤ 5 mm/5 minutes and NITBUT < 5 significantly improved (P = 0.00 and 0.001, respectively) at 3 months in the SH group compared with the HPMC/Dextran group. Thus, 0.3% SH gave significantly superior tear secretion and tear film instability outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n Both types of preservative-free artificial tears are effective in treating postsurgery DED. Compared with HPMC/Dextran, 0.3% SH artificial tears showed more improvements in Schirmer I test and NITBUT postsurgery.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/coa.0000000000000027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/coa.0000000000000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是通过分析手术前和手术后的眼表,比较 0.3% 羟丙基甲基纤维素/右旋糖酐(HPMC/Dextran)和 0.3% 透明质酸钠(SH)治疗白内障手术后患者干眼症(DED)的疗效和安全性。 这项双盲、随机、平行组研究共招募了 96 名接受过超声乳化术的眼表功能障碍(尤其是 DED)患者。患者随机接受 HPMC/Dextran(56 人)或 0.3% SH(40 人)。所有患者每天 4 次,每次 1 滴。在基线期、术后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月,收集了 OCULUS 角膜塑形镜 5M 和 Schirmer I 测试(无麻醉)的数据。 术后三个月,眼表、Schirmer I 测试、泪液半月板高度(TMH)、无创泪膜破裂时间(NITBUT)、meibography、眼红和眼表疾病指数均有明显改善。与 HPMC/Dextran 组相比,SH 组的 Schirmer I 试验、TMH 和 NITBUT 均有明显改善(P = 0.07、0.17 和 0.43;方差分析,P < 0.05)。在对重度干眼症患者进行的亚组分析中,与 HPMC/Dextran 组相比,SH 组的 Schirmer I 测试 ≤ 5 mm/5 分钟和 NITBUT < 5 在 3 个月时有明显改善(P = 0.00 和 0.001,分别为 0.00 和 0.001)。因此,0.3% SH 在泪液分泌和泪膜不稳定性方面的效果明显优于 HPMC/Dextran。 两种不含防腐剂的人工泪液都能有效治疗术后 DED。与HPMC/Dextran相比,0.3% SH人工泪液在手术后的Schirmer I测试和NITBUT方面有更大的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ocular Surface Analysis of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery
We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran (HPMC/Dextran) and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) in postcataract surgery patients by analyzing the presurgery and postsurgery ocular surface. This double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled 96 patients with ocular surface dysfunction, specifically DED, after phacoemulsification. Patients were randomized to receive either HPMC/Dextran (n = 56) or 0.3% SH (n = 40). All patients received 1 drop per eye, 4 times per day. Data from OCULUS Keratograph 5M and Schirmer I tests without anesthesia were collected at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Three months postsurgery, the ocular surface, Schirmer I test, tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive tear film break-up time (NITBUT), meibography, redness, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were significantly improved. The Schirmer I test, TMH, and NITBUT improved significantly (P = 0.07, 0.17, and 0.43, respectively; analysis of variance, P < 0.05) in the SH group compared with the HPMC/Dextran group. In a subgroup analysis of patients with severe dry eye, Schirmer I test ≤ 5 mm/5 minutes and NITBUT < 5 significantly improved (P = 0.00 and 0.001, respectively) at 3 months in the SH group compared with the HPMC/Dextran group. Thus, 0.3% SH gave significantly superior tear secretion and tear film instability outcomes. Both types of preservative-free artificial tears are effective in treating postsurgery DED. Compared with HPMC/Dextran, 0.3% SH artificial tears showed more improvements in Schirmer I test and NITBUT postsurgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Efficacy of Autologous Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation for Stem Cell Deficiency in Ocular Surface Burn Native Australian Bronze Orange Stink Bug (Musgraveia sulciventris)–Related Corneal Injury Ocular Surface Analysis of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery Ocular Surface Analysis of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery Allogenic Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation: An Approach to Bilateral Recurrent Pterygia and Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1