母牛产前补充蛋白质和能量以及体况评分可调节受阉牛影响的母牛-小牛配对的生产性能。

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Reproduction Science Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107433
P. Moriel , M. Vedovatto , V. Izquierdo , E.A. Palmer , J.M.B. Vendramini
{"title":"母牛产前补充蛋白质和能量以及体况评分可调节受阉牛影响的母牛-小牛配对的生产性能。","authors":"P. Moriel ,&nbsp;M. Vedovatto ,&nbsp;V. Izquierdo ,&nbsp;E.A. Palmer ,&nbsp;J.M.B. Vendramini","doi":"10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Retrospective analyses were performed on a dataset of 1188 fall-calving, Brangus cow-calf pairs. Analyses 1 sorted cows according to their initial body condition score (<strong>BCS &lt; 5</strong> vs. <strong>≥ 5</strong>) and whether they received (<strong>SUP</strong>) or not (<strong>NOSUP</strong>) prepartum supplementation of protein and energy. Analyses 2 sorted cows according to their calving BCS (<strong>BCS &lt; 5</strong> or <strong>≥ 5</strong>) and BCS change from calving until the start of the breeding season (lost, maintained, or gained). Cows were not estrus synchronized and were assigned to natural breeding for 90 days. Prepartum supplementation increased (<em>P</em> = 0.04) pregnancy percentage in cows with initial BCS &lt; 5 but not (<em>P</em> = 0.20) with initial BCS ≥ 5. Calf weaning weight was greatest (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.04) for calves born from SU<em>P</em> cows with an initial BCS ≥ 5 and did not differ (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.56) among all remaining groups. Among cows with calving BCS &lt; 5, pregnancy percentage were less (<em>P</em> = 0.05) for cows that lost vs. maintained/gained BCS. Postpartum BCS change did not (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.16) impact pregnancy percentage of cows calving at BCS ≥ 5. Calf weaning weight increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for cows calving with BCS ≥ 5 vs. &lt; 5 and was not impacted (<em>P</em> = 0.47) by postpartum BCS change. Therefore, precalving supplementation improved reproduction of cows with BCS below optimal and weaning weight of calves born from cows with BCS above optimal, whereas calving BCS was the major factor affecting postpartum BCS change and cow reproductive performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7880,"journal":{"name":"Animal Reproduction Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal prepartum supplementation of protein and energy and body condition score modulated the performance of Bos indicus-influenced cow-calf pairs\",\"authors\":\"P. Moriel ,&nbsp;M. Vedovatto ,&nbsp;V. Izquierdo ,&nbsp;E.A. Palmer ,&nbsp;J.M.B. Vendramini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Retrospective analyses were performed on a dataset of 1188 fall-calving, Brangus cow-calf pairs. Analyses 1 sorted cows according to their initial body condition score (<strong>BCS &lt; 5</strong> vs. <strong>≥ 5</strong>) and whether they received (<strong>SUP</strong>) or not (<strong>NOSUP</strong>) prepartum supplementation of protein and energy. Analyses 2 sorted cows according to their calving BCS (<strong>BCS &lt; 5</strong> or <strong>≥ 5</strong>) and BCS change from calving until the start of the breeding season (lost, maintained, or gained). Cows were not estrus synchronized and were assigned to natural breeding for 90 days. Prepartum supplementation increased (<em>P</em> = 0.04) pregnancy percentage in cows with initial BCS &lt; 5 but not (<em>P</em> = 0.20) with initial BCS ≥ 5. Calf weaning weight was greatest (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.04) for calves born from SU<em>P</em> cows with an initial BCS ≥ 5 and did not differ (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.56) among all remaining groups. Among cows with calving BCS &lt; 5, pregnancy percentage were less (<em>P</em> = 0.05) for cows that lost vs. maintained/gained BCS. Postpartum BCS change did not (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.16) impact pregnancy percentage of cows calving at BCS ≥ 5. Calf weaning weight increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for cows calving with BCS ≥ 5 vs. &lt; 5 and was not impacted (<em>P</em> = 0.47) by postpartum BCS change. Therefore, precalving supplementation improved reproduction of cows with BCS below optimal and weaning weight of calves born from cows with BCS above optimal, whereas calving BCS was the major factor affecting postpartum BCS change and cow reproductive performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Reproduction Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Reproduction Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432024000241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Reproduction Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432024000241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对1188对秋季产犊的布兰格斯牛-小牛数据集进行了回顾性分析。分析 1 根据奶牛的初始体况评分(BCS < 5 vs. ≥ 5)以及是否在产前补充蛋白质和能量(SUP)对奶牛进行了分类。分析 2 根据奶牛的产犊 BCS(BCS < 5 或≥ 5)和从产犊到繁殖季节开始的 BCS 变化(损失、维持或增加)对奶牛进行分类。母牛未同步发情,并被安排自然配种 90 天。产前补充营养可提高(P = 0.04)初始 BCS < 5 奶牛的妊娠率,但不能提高(P = 0.20)初始 BCS ≥ 5 奶牛的妊娠率。初始 BCS ≥ 5 的 SUP 母牛所产犊牛断奶重最大(P ≤ 0.04),其余各组间无差异(P ≥ 0.56)。在产犊 BCS < 5 的奶牛中,BCS 下降的奶牛与 BCS 保持/上升的奶牛的妊娠率较低(P = 0.05)。产后 BCS 变化对 BCS ≥ 5 产犊母牛的妊娠率没有影响(P ≥ 0.16)。BCS≥5与< 5相比,产犊母牛的犊牛断奶重增加(P< 0.01),产后BCS变化对其断奶重没有影响(P = 0.47)。因此,产前补饲可提高BCS低于最佳值的奶牛的繁殖能力和BCS高于最佳值的奶牛所产犊牛的断奶重,而产犊时的BCS是影响产后BCS变化和奶牛繁殖性能的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maternal prepartum supplementation of protein and energy and body condition score modulated the performance of Bos indicus-influenced cow-calf pairs

Retrospective analyses were performed on a dataset of 1188 fall-calving, Brangus cow-calf pairs. Analyses 1 sorted cows according to their initial body condition score (BCS < 5 vs. ≥ 5) and whether they received (SUP) or not (NOSUP) prepartum supplementation of protein and energy. Analyses 2 sorted cows according to their calving BCS (BCS < 5 or ≥ 5) and BCS change from calving until the start of the breeding season (lost, maintained, or gained). Cows were not estrus synchronized and were assigned to natural breeding for 90 days. Prepartum supplementation increased (P = 0.04) pregnancy percentage in cows with initial BCS < 5 but not (P = 0.20) with initial BCS ≥ 5. Calf weaning weight was greatest (P ≤ 0.04) for calves born from SUP cows with an initial BCS ≥ 5 and did not differ (P ≥ 0.56) among all remaining groups. Among cows with calving BCS < 5, pregnancy percentage were less (P = 0.05) for cows that lost vs. maintained/gained BCS. Postpartum BCS change did not (P ≥ 0.16) impact pregnancy percentage of cows calving at BCS ≥ 5. Calf weaning weight increased (P < 0.01) for cows calving with BCS ≥ 5 vs. < 5 and was not impacted (P = 0.47) by postpartum BCS change. Therefore, precalving supplementation improved reproduction of cows with BCS below optimal and weaning weight of calves born from cows with BCS above optimal, whereas calving BCS was the major factor affecting postpartum BCS change and cow reproductive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Reproduction Science
Animal Reproduction Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Animal Reproduction Science publishes results from studies relating to reproduction and fertility in animals. This includes both fundamental research and applied studies, including management practices that increase our understanding of the biology and manipulation of reproduction. Manuscripts should go into depth in the mechanisms involved in the research reported, rather than a give a mere description of findings. The focus is on animals that are useful to humans including food- and fibre-producing; companion/recreational; captive; and endangered species including zoo animals, but excluding laboratory animals unless the results of the study provide new information that impacts the basic understanding of the biology or manipulation of reproduction. The journal''s scope includes the study of reproductive physiology and endocrinology, reproductive cycles, natural and artificial control of reproduction, preservation and use of gametes and embryos, pregnancy and parturition, infertility and sterility, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. The Editorial Board of Animal Reproduction Science has decided not to publish papers in which there is an exclusive examination of the in vitro development of oocytes and embryos; however, there will be consideration of papers that include in vitro studies where the source of the oocytes and/or development of the embryos beyond the blastocyst stage is part of the experimental design.
期刊最新文献
The effect of flunixin meglumine on the premature regression of corpus luteum, recovery rate, and embryo production in superovulated Dorper ewes Influence of commercial inactivated or modified-live virus vaccination at time of AI on corpus luteum development and function in beef cattle L-carnitine supplementation in conventional slow and ultra-rapid freezing media improves motility, membrane integrity, and fertilizing ability of dog epididymal sperm Editorial Board Pathological characteristics of SRY-negative 38,XX-DSD pigs: A family case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1