督导咨询对工作投入的作用:前瞻性队列研究

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Safety and Health at Work Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2024.02.003
Nuri P. Adi , Tomohisa Nagata , Kiminori Odagami , Masako Nagata , Koji Mori
{"title":"督导咨询对工作投入的作用:前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Nuri P. Adi ,&nbsp;Tomohisa Nagata ,&nbsp;Kiminori Odagami ,&nbsp;Masako Nagata ,&nbsp;Koji Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.shaw.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We examined the association between supervisor consultation, as an actual practice representing supervisor support, and work engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective cohort study in Japan, involving 14,026 participants who met the requirement for a one-year follow-up. Supervisor consultation was measured using a single question, and work engagement was defined using the Japanese version of the nine-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). Associations were examined using linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Supervisor consultation was positively associated with work engagement after adjusting for gender, age, education, income, and industry (<em>β</em> = 3.474; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The relationship remained significant after adjustment for perceived supervisor support, although the coefficient decreased (<em>β</em> = 1.315; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Supervisor consultation probably acted on work engagement in different ways than perceived supervisor support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56149,"journal":{"name":"Safety and Health at Work","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 147-150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209379112400009X/pdfft?md5=f9f67309792ee17b6101e9720b161de9&pid=1-s2.0-S209379112400009X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Supervisor Consultation Toward Work Engagement: A Prospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Nuri P. Adi ,&nbsp;Tomohisa Nagata ,&nbsp;Kiminori Odagami ,&nbsp;Masako Nagata ,&nbsp;Koji Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shaw.2024.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We examined the association between supervisor consultation, as an actual practice representing supervisor support, and work engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective cohort study in Japan, involving 14,026 participants who met the requirement for a one-year follow-up. Supervisor consultation was measured using a single question, and work engagement was defined using the Japanese version of the nine-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). Associations were examined using linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Supervisor consultation was positively associated with work engagement after adjusting for gender, age, education, income, and industry (<em>β</em> = 3.474; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The relationship remained significant after adjustment for perceived supervisor support, although the coefficient decreased (<em>β</em> = 1.315; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Supervisor consultation probably acted on work engagement in different ways than perceived supervisor support.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety and Health at Work\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 147-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209379112400009X/pdfft?md5=f9f67309792ee17b6101e9720b161de9&pid=1-s2.0-S209379112400009X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety and Health at Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209379112400009X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety and Health at Work","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209379112400009X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法这是一项在日本进行的前瞻性队列研究,共有 14,026 名符合一年随访要求的参与者参与其中。督导咨询采用单一问题进行测量,工作投入度采用九项乌特勒支工作投入度量表(UWES-9)的日文版进行定义。结果在对性别、年龄、教育程度、收入和行业进行调整后,主管咨询与工作投入呈正相关(β = 3.474; p < 0.001)。结论上司咨询与上司支持可能以不同的方式对工作投入度产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of Supervisor Consultation Toward Work Engagement: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

We examined the association between supervisor consultation, as an actual practice representing supervisor support, and work engagement.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study in Japan, involving 14,026 participants who met the requirement for a one-year follow-up. Supervisor consultation was measured using a single question, and work engagement was defined using the Japanese version of the nine-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). Associations were examined using linear regression analysis.

Results

Supervisor consultation was positively associated with work engagement after adjusting for gender, age, education, income, and industry (β = 3.474; p < 0.001). The relationship remained significant after adjustment for perceived supervisor support, although the coefficient decreased (β = 1.315; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Supervisor consultation probably acted on work engagement in different ways than perceived supervisor support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety and Health at Work
Safety and Health at Work Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1080
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Safety and Health at Work (SH@W) is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal published quarterly in English beginning in 2010. The journal is aimed at providing grounds for the exchange of ideas and data developed through research experience in the broad field of occupational health and safety. Articles may deal with scientific research to improve workers'' health and safety by eliminating occupational accidents and diseases, pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe and comfortable working environment. The journal focuses primarily on original articles across the whole scope of occupational health and safety, but also welcomes up-to-date review papers and short communications and commentaries on urgent issues and case studies on unique epidemiological survey, methods of accident investigation, and analysis. High priority will be given to articles on occupational epidemiology, medicine, hygiene, toxicology, nursing and health services, work safety, ergonomics, work organization, engineering of safety (mechanical, electrical, chemical, and construction), safety management and policy, and studies related to economic evaluation and its social policy and organizational aspects. Its abbreviated title is Saf Health Work.
期刊最新文献
How Resilient are Lucid Motivators? Endeavoring Reforms for Effects of Psycho-social Factors on Workers Health Through Concurrent Engineering Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Inhalable Aerosols in an Instant Powdered Food Manufacturing Plant in Norway Management Architecture With Multi-modal Ensemble AI Models for Worker Safety Safety Climate Transformation in Oil and Gas Company Ownership Transition (Study Case from Multinational to National Company) Respiratory and Other Hazard Characteristics of Substances in Cleaning Products Used in Healthcare Centres in England and Wales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1