有潜在健康问题的人接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的保护性免疫持续时间:快速回顾

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY Reviews in Medical Virology Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1002/rmv.2504
K. Walsh, Helen O’Donnell, Mark O’Loughlin, Heather Eames, Jingjing Jiang, Katie M. O’Brien, N. Broderick, Kirsty O'Brien, M. Carrigan, L. Comber, Karen Cardwell, Joan Quigley, Susan M. Smith, Eamon O Murchu, Karina Butler, Brenda Corcoran, Kevin Connolly, P. Harrington, M. Ryan, M. O’Neill
{"title":"有潜在健康问题的人接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的保护性免疫持续时间:快速回顾","authors":"K. Walsh, Helen O’Donnell, Mark O’Loughlin, Heather Eames, Jingjing Jiang, Katie M. O’Brien, N. Broderick, Kirsty O'Brien, M. Carrigan, L. Comber, Karen Cardwell, Joan Quigley, Susan M. Smith, Eamon O Murchu, Karina Butler, Brenda Corcoran, Kevin Connolly, P. Harrington, M. Ryan, M. O’Neill","doi":"10.1002/rmv.2504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Health Organization has stated that the primary goal of immunisation in the COVID‐19 pandemic remains to protect against hospitalisation, severe disease and death. Vaccination is particularly important for those with underlying health conditions given the high risk of severe disease in this population. The aim of this review was to examine the change in efficacy and effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination over time in individuals with underlying conditions. A rapid review was undertaken in Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Europe PMC, MedRxiv and Google Scholar from 01/01/2020 to 27/10/2021. A total of 14 unique studies (3 randomised controlled trials and 11 observational studies) were included. Overall, there was limited and inconsistent evidence regarding vaccine efficacy and effectiveness in those with underlying health conditions. However, the evidence suggests potentially faster waning of vaccine effectiveness against infection, severe disease and death in individuals with underlying conditions, particularly for older adults with these conditions, and in those who are immunocompromised. Protection in younger age groups with underlying conditions who are not immunocompromised, may be largely comparable to that observed in the general population, though this is uncertain. Given the significant burden of infection on individuals with underlying conditions, any small decrease in protection is likely to have a substantial impact in this population. Hence, the evidence supports a policy of providing additional doses to those who are immunocompromised, and boosters to all those with underlying health conditions. Further research is required to understand the impact of new variants on vaccine efficacy/effectiveness in this population.","PeriodicalId":21180,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of protective immunity following COVID‐19 vaccination of individuals with underlying health conditions: A rapid review\",\"authors\":\"K. Walsh, Helen O’Donnell, Mark O’Loughlin, Heather Eames, Jingjing Jiang, Katie M. O’Brien, N. Broderick, Kirsty O'Brien, M. Carrigan, L. Comber, Karen Cardwell, Joan Quigley, Susan M. Smith, Eamon O Murchu, Karina Butler, Brenda Corcoran, Kevin Connolly, P. Harrington, M. Ryan, M. O’Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rmv.2504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The World Health Organization has stated that the primary goal of immunisation in the COVID‐19 pandemic remains to protect against hospitalisation, severe disease and death. Vaccination is particularly important for those with underlying health conditions given the high risk of severe disease in this population. The aim of this review was to examine the change in efficacy and effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination over time in individuals with underlying conditions. A rapid review was undertaken in Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Europe PMC, MedRxiv and Google Scholar from 01/01/2020 to 27/10/2021. A total of 14 unique studies (3 randomised controlled trials and 11 observational studies) were included. Overall, there was limited and inconsistent evidence regarding vaccine efficacy and effectiveness in those with underlying health conditions. However, the evidence suggests potentially faster waning of vaccine effectiveness against infection, severe disease and death in individuals with underlying conditions, particularly for older adults with these conditions, and in those who are immunocompromised. Protection in younger age groups with underlying conditions who are not immunocompromised, may be largely comparable to that observed in the general population, though this is uncertain. Given the significant burden of infection on individuals with underlying conditions, any small decrease in protection is likely to have a substantial impact in this population. Hence, the evidence supports a policy of providing additional doses to those who are immunocompromised, and boosters to all those with underlying health conditions. Further research is required to understand the impact of new variants on vaccine efficacy/effectiveness in this population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Medical Virology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Medical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织指出,在 COVID-19 大流行中,免疫接种的主要目标仍然是防止住院、重症和死亡。鉴于有潜在健康问题的人群罹患严重疾病的风险较高,因此接种疫苗对这些人群尤为重要。本综述旨在研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种的效力和有效性随时间推移在患有基础疾病的人群中的变化情况。自 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 27 日,我们在 Cochrane、Embase、Medline、Europe PMC、MedRxiv 和 Google Scholar 上进行了快速综述。共纳入了 14 项独特的研究(3 项随机对照试验和 11 项观察性研究)。总体而言,有关疫苗对有潜在健康问题的人群的效力和有效性的证据有限且不一致。不过,有证据表明,疫苗对患有基础疾病的人,尤其是患有这些疾病的老年人和免疫力低下的人,在预防感染、严重疾病和死亡方面的效果可能会更快地减弱。对于有基础疾病但免疫力未受损的年轻群体,疫苗的保护作用可能与普通人群的保护作用基本相当,但这一点尚不确定。鉴于基础疾病患者的感染负担沉重,保护能力的任何微小下降都可能对这一人群产生重大影响。因此,证据支持为免疫力低下的人群提供额外剂量的疫苗,并为所有患有基础疾病的人群提供强化疫苗的政策。要了解新变异株对这一人群的疫苗效力/有效性的影响,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Duration of protective immunity following COVID‐19 vaccination of individuals with underlying health conditions: A rapid review
The World Health Organization has stated that the primary goal of immunisation in the COVID‐19 pandemic remains to protect against hospitalisation, severe disease and death. Vaccination is particularly important for those with underlying health conditions given the high risk of severe disease in this population. The aim of this review was to examine the change in efficacy and effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination over time in individuals with underlying conditions. A rapid review was undertaken in Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Europe PMC, MedRxiv and Google Scholar from 01/01/2020 to 27/10/2021. A total of 14 unique studies (3 randomised controlled trials and 11 observational studies) were included. Overall, there was limited and inconsistent evidence regarding vaccine efficacy and effectiveness in those with underlying health conditions. However, the evidence suggests potentially faster waning of vaccine effectiveness against infection, severe disease and death in individuals with underlying conditions, particularly for older adults with these conditions, and in those who are immunocompromised. Protection in younger age groups with underlying conditions who are not immunocompromised, may be largely comparable to that observed in the general population, though this is uncertain. Given the significant burden of infection on individuals with underlying conditions, any small decrease in protection is likely to have a substantial impact in this population. Hence, the evidence supports a policy of providing additional doses to those who are immunocompromised, and boosters to all those with underlying health conditions. Further research is required to understand the impact of new variants on vaccine efficacy/effectiveness in this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Virology
Reviews in Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Virology aims to provide articles reviewing conceptual or technological advances in diverse areas of virology. The journal covers topics such as molecular biology, cell biology, replication, pathogenesis, immunology, immunization, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment of viruses of medical importance, and COVID-19 research. The journal has an Impact Factor of 6.989 for the year 2020. The readership of the journal includes clinicians, virologists, medical microbiologists, molecular biologists, infectious disease specialists, and immunologists. Reviews in Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in databases such as CABI, Abstracts in Anthropology, ProQuest, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, ProQuest Central K-494, SCOPUS, and Web of Science et,al.
期刊最新文献
Acute Post-Measles Encephalitis in a Returning Traveller: Highlighting the Need for MMR Vaccination. Crosstalk Between Innate Immunity and Autophagy in Viral Myocarditis Leading to Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Interplays Between Matrix Metalloproteinases and Neurotropic Viruses: An Overview. The Assessment of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Different Vaccine Platforms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Studies. Underlying Factors Predisposing to Viral-Induced Neurological Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1