实现碳中和的现状与未来:定量社会经济模型研究综述

IF 6.2 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary Fundamental Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.12.020
Jiali Zheng , Xiaoqing Hou , Hongbo Duan , Shouyang Wang
{"title":"实现碳中和的现状与未来:定量社会经济模型研究综述","authors":"Jiali Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Hou ,&nbsp;Hongbo Duan ,&nbsp;Shouyang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fmre.2023.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By conducting a bibliometric analysis of 1997 scholarly publications on carbon neutrality and zero carbon emissions from 2019 to 2022, it is found that reviews of quantitative socioeconomic modeling research remain limited. To address this issue, a comprehensive review of carbon neutrality research, specifically, a systematic and synergistic review of the literature from a socioeconomic modeling perspective, is needed. The 20 clustering labels in the four largest clusters are summarized as main research streams, that is, carbon emission reduction, carbon sink and carbon capture and storage according to the definition of carbon neutral. Thus, this review revealed that carbon neutrality in the quantitative socioeconomic field is characterized in three main research directions. Sector integration, including integration within and among sectors, and integrated assessment models (IAMs), particularly multimodel analysis, can be regarded as a key node for carbon emission reduction. Carbon sink accounting, trade, and policy evaluated through technological and socioeconomic modeling, which includes both top-down and bottom-up types, are critical issues for carbon sinks. Carbon removal technologies and their application in IAMs are important topics for carbon capture and storage. This review provides a clear understanding of model-driven socioeconomic research on carbon neutrality via a systematic framework in quantitative analyses, outlining the potential gaps and challenges and providing possible insights and implications in a synergistic manner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34602,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Research","volume":"4 6","pages":"Pages 1696-1709"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where we are and where we will go to achieve carbon neutrality: A review of quantitative socioeconomic modeling research\",\"authors\":\"Jiali Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Hou ,&nbsp;Hongbo Duan ,&nbsp;Shouyang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fmre.2023.12.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>By conducting a bibliometric analysis of 1997 scholarly publications on carbon neutrality and zero carbon emissions from 2019 to 2022, it is found that reviews of quantitative socioeconomic modeling research remain limited. To address this issue, a comprehensive review of carbon neutrality research, specifically, a systematic and synergistic review of the literature from a socioeconomic modeling perspective, is needed. The 20 clustering labels in the four largest clusters are summarized as main research streams, that is, carbon emission reduction, carbon sink and carbon capture and storage according to the definition of carbon neutral. Thus, this review revealed that carbon neutrality in the quantitative socioeconomic field is characterized in three main research directions. Sector integration, including integration within and among sectors, and integrated assessment models (IAMs), particularly multimodel analysis, can be regarded as a key node for carbon emission reduction. Carbon sink accounting, trade, and policy evaluated through technological and socioeconomic modeling, which includes both top-down and bottom-up types, are critical issues for carbon sinks. Carbon removal technologies and their application in IAMs are important topics for carbon capture and storage. This review provides a clear understanding of model-driven socioeconomic research on carbon neutrality via a systematic framework in quantitative analyses, outlining the potential gaps and challenges and providing possible insights and implications in a synergistic manner.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental Research\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1696-1709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325824000554\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325824000554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对1997年关于2019 - 2022年碳中和和零碳排放的学术出版物进行文献计量分析,发现定量社会经济模型研究的综述仍然有限。为了解决这一问题,需要对碳中和研究进行全面的回顾,特别是从社会经济模型的角度对文献进行系统和协同的回顾。根据碳中性的定义,将4个最大集群中的20个聚类标签归纳为主要研究流,即碳减排、碳汇和碳捕集与封存。综上所述,定量社会经济领域的碳中和研究呈现出三个主要的研究方向。部门整合,包括部门内部和部门之间的整合,以及综合评估模型,特别是多模型分析,可以被视为碳减排的关键节点。通过技术和社会经济模型(包括自上而下和自下而上的模型)评估的碳汇核算、贸易和政策是碳汇的关键问题。碳去除技术及其在人工晶体中的应用是碳捕获与封存的重要课题。本综述通过定量分析的系统框架,对模型驱动的碳中和社会经济研究提供了清晰的认识,概述了潜在的差距和挑战,并以协同的方式提供了可能的见解和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where we are and where we will go to achieve carbon neutrality: A review of quantitative socioeconomic modeling research
By conducting a bibliometric analysis of 1997 scholarly publications on carbon neutrality and zero carbon emissions from 2019 to 2022, it is found that reviews of quantitative socioeconomic modeling research remain limited. To address this issue, a comprehensive review of carbon neutrality research, specifically, a systematic and synergistic review of the literature from a socioeconomic modeling perspective, is needed. The 20 clustering labels in the four largest clusters are summarized as main research streams, that is, carbon emission reduction, carbon sink and carbon capture and storage according to the definition of carbon neutral. Thus, this review revealed that carbon neutrality in the quantitative socioeconomic field is characterized in three main research directions. Sector integration, including integration within and among sectors, and integrated assessment models (IAMs), particularly multimodel analysis, can be regarded as a key node for carbon emission reduction. Carbon sink accounting, trade, and policy evaluated through technological and socioeconomic modeling, which includes both top-down and bottom-up types, are critical issues for carbon sinks. Carbon removal technologies and their application in IAMs are important topics for carbon capture and storage. This review provides a clear understanding of model-driven socioeconomic research on carbon neutrality via a systematic framework in quantitative analyses, outlining the potential gaps and challenges and providing possible insights and implications in a synergistic manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fundamental Research
Fundamental Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
1.60%
发文量
294
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Loosening metal nodes in metal-organic frameworks to facilitate the regulation of valence Polarization variable terahertz metasurface along the propagation path Out-of-phase relationship of Holocene moisture variations between the northeastern and southeastern Tibetan plateau and its societal impacts Disease prediction by network information gain on a single sample basis Mannan-decorated STING-activating vaccine carrier for spatial coordinative stimulating antigen-specific immune responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1