德国人对微生物蛋白Solein®的态度和消费意愿--信息框架的影响

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105132
Lena Szczepanski , Sharon Sass , Christina Olding, Jacqueline Dupont, Florian Fiebelkorn
{"title":"德国人对微生物蛋白Solein®的态度和消费意愿--信息框架的影响","authors":"Lena Szczepanski ,&nbsp;Sharon Sass ,&nbsp;Christina Olding,&nbsp;Jacqueline Dupont,&nbsp;Florian Fiebelkorn","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microbial protein obtained by cultivating hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria may provide a more sustainable alternative to conventional meat. The present study investigates the attitudes of the German population (<em>N</em> = 642) toward the microbial protein Solein® as a meat alternative and their willingness to consume it. In addition, the influence of selected nutritional and environmental psychological variables (Food [Technology] Neophobia, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness, Green Consumption Values) on Germans’ attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative and willingness to consume is analyzed. The study also examines whether framing, consisting of information on health benefits, environmental benefits, or technical aspects of Solein® production, affects Germans' attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative and their willingness to consume it. For this purpose, participants were assigned to one of three framing groups: health, environmental, or technical. The results show that Germans’ attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative were neutral, with a positive tendency. Participants perceived Solein® as modern, sustainable, and environmentally friendly, but also as artificial, exotic, and rather expensive. Germans’ willingness to consume Solein® as a meat alternative was neutral. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative were the strongest predictor for willingness to consume it. The three different information-based framings affected neither attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative nor the willingness to consume it. However, participants in the health and environmental framing groups had more positive attitudes toward Solein® than the control group and were also more likely to be willing to consume Solein® than the control group. A tendency toward a positive effect for these two framings was thus recognizable. Suggestions for using the findings of this study in the design of marketing strategies are presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400034X/pdfft?md5=808bee91d4d9e57e47a5d79b28575bec&pid=1-s2.0-S095032932400034X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Germans' attitudes toward the microbial protein Solein® and willingness to consume it – The effect of information-based framing\",\"authors\":\"Lena Szczepanski ,&nbsp;Sharon Sass ,&nbsp;Christina Olding,&nbsp;Jacqueline Dupont,&nbsp;Florian Fiebelkorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Microbial protein obtained by cultivating hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria may provide a more sustainable alternative to conventional meat. The present study investigates the attitudes of the German population (<em>N</em> = 642) toward the microbial protein Solein® as a meat alternative and their willingness to consume it. In addition, the influence of selected nutritional and environmental psychological variables (Food [Technology] Neophobia, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness, Green Consumption Values) on Germans’ attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative and willingness to consume is analyzed. The study also examines whether framing, consisting of information on health benefits, environmental benefits, or technical aspects of Solein® production, affects Germans' attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative and their willingness to consume it. For this purpose, participants were assigned to one of three framing groups: health, environmental, or technical. The results show that Germans’ attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative were neutral, with a positive tendency. Participants perceived Solein® as modern, sustainable, and environmentally friendly, but also as artificial, exotic, and rather expensive. Germans’ willingness to consume Solein® as a meat alternative was neutral. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative were the strongest predictor for willingness to consume it. The three different information-based framings affected neither attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative nor the willingness to consume it. However, participants in the health and environmental framing groups had more positive attitudes toward Solein® than the control group and were also more likely to be willing to consume Solein® than the control group. A tendency toward a positive effect for these two framings was thus recognizable. Suggestions for using the findings of this study in the design of marketing strategies are presented.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400034X/pdfft?md5=808bee91d4d9e57e47a5d79b28575bec&pid=1-s2.0-S095032932400034X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400034X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400034X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过培养氢氧化细菌获得的微生物蛋白质可能会成为传统肉类的一种更具可持续性的替代品。本研究调查了德国人(N = 642)对微生物蛋白质 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的态度及其消费意愿。此外,还分析了选定的营养和环境心理变量(食品[技术]恐新症、感知消费效果、绿色消费价值观)对德国人将 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的态度和消费意愿的影响。研究还探讨了由健康益处、环境益处或 Solein® 生产技术方面的信息组成的框架是否会影响德国人对 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的态度及其消费意愿。为此,参与者被分配到三个框架组之一:健康组、环境组或技术组。结果显示,德国人对 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的态度是中性的,有积极的倾向。参与者认为 Solein® 是现代的、可持续的和环保的,但也认为它是人工的、奇特的和相当昂贵的。德国人消费 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的意愿呈中性。层次多元回归法显示,对 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的态度是消费意愿的最强预测因素。三种不同的信息框架既不影响对 Solein® 作为肉类替代品的态度,也不影响消费意愿。然而,与对照组相比,健康和环境框架组的参与者对 Solein® 的态度更积极,也更愿意食用 Solein®。由此可见,这两种构思具有积极的效果。本研究还提出了在设计营销策略时利用本研究结果的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Germans' attitudes toward the microbial protein Solein® and willingness to consume it – The effect of information-based framing

Microbial protein obtained by cultivating hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria may provide a more sustainable alternative to conventional meat. The present study investigates the attitudes of the German population (N = 642) toward the microbial protein Solein® as a meat alternative and their willingness to consume it. In addition, the influence of selected nutritional and environmental psychological variables (Food [Technology] Neophobia, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness, Green Consumption Values) on Germans’ attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative and willingness to consume is analyzed. The study also examines whether framing, consisting of information on health benefits, environmental benefits, or technical aspects of Solein® production, affects Germans' attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative and their willingness to consume it. For this purpose, participants were assigned to one of three framing groups: health, environmental, or technical. The results show that Germans’ attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative were neutral, with a positive tendency. Participants perceived Solein® as modern, sustainable, and environmentally friendly, but also as artificial, exotic, and rather expensive. Germans’ willingness to consume Solein® as a meat alternative was neutral. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative were the strongest predictor for willingness to consume it. The three different information-based framings affected neither attitudes toward Solein® as a meat alternative nor the willingness to consume it. However, participants in the health and environmental framing groups had more positive attitudes toward Solein® than the control group and were also more likely to be willing to consume Solein® than the control group. A tendency toward a positive effect for these two framings was thus recognizable. Suggestions for using the findings of this study in the design of marketing strategies are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the role of awareness and trust in consumer purchase decisions for healthy food and products Editorial Board “I’m like, whatever you want me to be. I’m the flavor of the day”: A mixed-methods study of the food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals Advancing investigations into the effects of sweet and bitter tastes on agreeableness and hostility Diversity in gender and age, but not in race, enhances food purchase intentions in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1