[从学生和教师的角度看机遇与限制]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Hno Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00106-024-01437-8
Lisa Schmitz, Christian S Betz, Arne Böttcher, Sophia M Häußler, Mark Praetorius
{"title":"[从学生和教师的角度看机遇与限制]。","authors":"Lisa Schmitz, Christian S Betz, Arne Böttcher, Sophia M Häußler, Mark Praetorius","doi":"10.1007/s00106-024-01437-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digitalization has long been an integral part of students' everyday lives and increasingly also of their medical training. It seems to be an unwritten law that \"digital natives\" want as much digitalization as possible. This study aims to shed more light on how students in the clinical phase of medical studies perceive the increasing digitalization of teaching and what they need for good education.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed two surveys that were conducted using an online questionnaire. On the one hand, students in the 5th-9th semesters of the medical faculty at the University of Hamburg (n = 282) were surveyed (survey 1). Another survey addressed all employees of ENT clinics in Germany (n = 175; survey 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 students took part in survey 1 and 123 lecturers in survey 2. The results show that both students and lecturers do not want face-to-face teaching to be completely replaced by digital formats. A total of 72.7% of students reject the possibility of teaching practical skills through digital formats. The majority of students surveyed stated that offline formats improve their concentration (61.1%), participation probability (63.9%), and motivation to learn (76.6%). In contrast, 40.2% of lecturers see digitalization as a way to reduce the workload without any relevant loss in teaching quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital teaching formats have a negative impact on the medical education of the students surveyed. Interaction and physical presence are needed to increase the motivation to learn. This leads to the first conclusion that students are critical of the increasing digitalization of medical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55052,"journal":{"name":"Hno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11045585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[How much digitization do ENT curricula need? : Opportunities and limits from the perspective of students and teachers].\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Schmitz, Christian S Betz, Arne Böttcher, Sophia M Häußler, Mark Praetorius\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00106-024-01437-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digitalization has long been an integral part of students' everyday lives and increasingly also of their medical training. It seems to be an unwritten law that \\\"digital natives\\\" want as much digitalization as possible. This study aims to shed more light on how students in the clinical phase of medical studies perceive the increasing digitalization of teaching and what they need for good education.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed two surveys that were conducted using an online questionnaire. On the one hand, students in the 5th-9th semesters of the medical faculty at the University of Hamburg (n = 282) were surveyed (survey 1). Another survey addressed all employees of ENT clinics in Germany (n = 175; survey 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 students took part in survey 1 and 123 lecturers in survey 2. The results show that both students and lecturers do not want face-to-face teaching to be completely replaced by digital formats. A total of 72.7% of students reject the possibility of teaching practical skills through digital formats. The majority of students surveyed stated that offline formats improve their concentration (61.1%), participation probability (63.9%), and motivation to learn (76.6%). In contrast, 40.2% of lecturers see digitalization as a way to reduce the workload without any relevant loss in teaching quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital teaching formats have a negative impact on the medical education of the students surveyed. Interaction and physical presence are needed to increase the motivation to learn. This leads to the first conclusion that students are critical of the increasing digitalization of medical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hno\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11045585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hno\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-024-01437-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hno","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-024-01437-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字化早已成为学生日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,也日益成为他们医学培训中不可或缺的一部分。数字原住民 "希望数字化越多越好,这似乎是一条不成文的规定。本研究旨在揭示医学临床学习阶段的学生如何看待日益数字化的教学,以及他们对良好教育的需求:本研究分析了使用在线问卷进行的两项调查。一方面,汉堡大学医学系第五至第九学期的学生(n = 282)接受了调查(调查1)。另一项调查针对德国耳鼻喉科诊所的所有员工(n = 175;调查 2):共有 76 名学生参与了调查 1,123 名讲师参与了调查 2。结果显示,学生和讲师都不希望面对面教学完全被数字化形式取代。共有 72.7% 的学生拒绝通过数字形式教授实用技能。大多数受访学生表示,离线形式能提高他们的注意力(61.1%)、参与概率(63.9%)和学习动力(76.6%)。相比之下,40.2%的讲师认为数字化是减少工作量的一种方式,不会对教学质量造成任何相关损失:结论:数字化教学形式对受访学生的医学教育产生了负面影响。要提高学生的学习积极性,需要互动和亲临现场。由此得出的第一个结论是,学生对医学学习日益数字化持批评态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[How much digitization do ENT curricula need? : Opportunities and limits from the perspective of students and teachers].

Background: Digitalization has long been an integral part of students' everyday lives and increasingly also of their medical training. It seems to be an unwritten law that "digital natives" want as much digitalization as possible. This study aims to shed more light on how students in the clinical phase of medical studies perceive the increasing digitalization of teaching and what they need for good education.

Materials and methods: This study analyzed two surveys that were conducted using an online questionnaire. On the one hand, students in the 5th-9th semesters of the medical faculty at the University of Hamburg (n = 282) were surveyed (survey 1). Another survey addressed all employees of ENT clinics in Germany (n = 175; survey 2).

Results: A total of 76 students took part in survey 1 and 123 lecturers in survey 2. The results show that both students and lecturers do not want face-to-face teaching to be completely replaced by digital formats. A total of 72.7% of students reject the possibility of teaching practical skills through digital formats. The majority of students surveyed stated that offline formats improve their concentration (61.1%), participation probability (63.9%), and motivation to learn (76.6%). In contrast, 40.2% of lecturers see digitalization as a way to reduce the workload without any relevant loss in teaching quality.

Conclusion: Digital teaching formats have a negative impact on the medical education of the students surveyed. Interaction and physical presence are needed to increase the motivation to learn. This leads to the first conclusion that students are critical of the increasing digitalization of medical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hno
Hno 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: HNO is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all ENT specialists in practices and clinics dealing with all aspects of ENT medicine, e.g. prevention, diagnostic methods, complication management, modern therapy strategies and surgical procedures. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of ENT medicine. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[The LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire : An analysis of multicentre data of children after early bilateral cochlear implant placement]. [Recurrent syncope : When does the otorhinolaryngologist get involved?] [Pitfalls in the diagnosis of house dust mite allergy]. [Pulsed DPOAEs in serial measurements : Combined analysis paradigm of simultaneously occurring changes in hearing thresholds and DPOAEs. German version]. [Trauma of the midface : Symptoms, diagnostics and treatment].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1