拓扑描述符排序

Brittany Terese Fasy, David L. Millman, Anna Schenfisch
{"title":"拓扑描述符排序","authors":"Brittany Terese Fasy, David L. Millman, Anna Schenfisch","doi":"arxiv-2402.13632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent developments in shape reconstruction and comparison call for the use\nof many different types of topological descriptors (persistence diagrams, Euler\ncharacteristic functions, etc.). We establish a framework that allows for\nquantitative comparisons of topological descriptor types and therefore may be\nused as a tool in more rigorously justifying choices made in applications. We\nthen use this framework to partially order a set of six common topological\ndescriptor types. In particular, the resulting poset gives insight into the\nadvantages of using verbose rather than concise topological descriptors. We\nthen provide lower bounds on the size of sets of descriptors that are complete\ndiscrete invariants of simplicial complexes, both tight and worst case. This\nwork sets up a rigorous theory that allows for future comparisons and analysis\nof topological descriptor types.","PeriodicalId":501570,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordering Topological Descriptors\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Terese Fasy, David L. Millman, Anna Schenfisch\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2402.13632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent developments in shape reconstruction and comparison call for the use\\nof many different types of topological descriptors (persistence diagrams, Euler\\ncharacteristic functions, etc.). We establish a framework that allows for\\nquantitative comparisons of topological descriptor types and therefore may be\\nused as a tool in more rigorously justifying choices made in applications. We\\nthen use this framework to partially order a set of six common topological\\ndescriptor types. In particular, the resulting poset gives insight into the\\nadvantages of using verbose rather than concise topological descriptors. We\\nthen provide lower bounds on the size of sets of descriptors that are complete\\ndiscrete invariants of simplicial complexes, both tight and worst case. This\\nwork sets up a rigorous theory that allows for future comparisons and analysis\\nof topological descriptor types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2402.13632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2402.13632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形状重建和比较的最新发展要求使用多种不同类型的拓扑描述符(持久图、欧拉特征函数等)。我们建立了一个框架,可以对拓扑描述符类型进行定量比较,因此可以作为一种工具,更严格地证明应用中的选择是合理的。我们利用这一框架对六种常见拓扑描述符类型进行了部分排序。特别是,由此产生的正集让我们深入了解了使用冗长而非简洁的拓扑描述符的优势。Wethen 提供了描述符集大小的下限,这些描述符集完成了简单复合物的离散不变式,既有严格的,也有最坏的情况。这项工作建立了一个严格的理论,为今后比较和分析拓扑描述符类型提供了可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ordering Topological Descriptors
Recent developments in shape reconstruction and comparison call for the use of many different types of topological descriptors (persistence diagrams, Euler characteristic functions, etc.). We establish a framework that allows for quantitative comparisons of topological descriptor types and therefore may be used as a tool in more rigorously justifying choices made in applications. We then use this framework to partially order a set of six common topological descriptor types. In particular, the resulting poset gives insight into the advantages of using verbose rather than concise topological descriptors. We then provide lower bounds on the size of sets of descriptors that are complete discrete invariants of simplicial complexes, both tight and worst case. This work sets up a rigorous theory that allows for future comparisons and analysis of topological descriptor types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimum Plane Bichromatic Spanning Trees Evolving Distributions Under Local Motion New Lower Bound and Algorithms for Online Geometric Hitting Set Problem Computing shortest paths amid non-overlapping weighted disks Fast Comparative Analysis of Merge Trees Using Locality Sensitive Hashing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1