法文缩写的积极和消极情绪表:开发、验证及其与其他简易版心理测量特性的比较

F. Boiroux
{"title":"法文缩写的积极和消极情绪表:开发、验证及其与其他简易版心理测量特性的比较","authors":"F. Boiroux","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->201 students, sample 2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->319 working people, sample 3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes\",\"authors\":\"F. Boiroux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->201 students, sample 2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->319 working people, sample 3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908822001049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908822001049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 通过与简易版 PANAS-SF(Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form;Kercher,1992 年)和国际简易版 PANAS-SF (International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form;I-PANAS-SF;Thompson,2007 年)进行比较,编制了简易量表 "简易积极和消极情绪表"(Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule,B-PANAS;10 个项目)。方法通过对 1047 名成年人(样本 1 = 201 名学生,样本 2 = 319 名上班族,样本 3 = 527 名成年人)进行的三项研究,开发了 B-PANAS 量表,并对三个短量表的因子结构、内部一致性和有效性进行了比较。B-PANAS 量表的二维结构在三项研究中都得到了验证,并且在不同年龄和性别的情况下都是不变的。所有信度指标都支持内部一致性。从与代表认知评价指标的工具(如罗森伯格自尊量表(Rosenberg,1965 年)、生活取向测试修订版(Scheier 等人,1994 年)和生活满意度量表(Diener 等人,1985 年))的相关性来看,B-PANAS 量表的名义网络与 PANAS 量表的名义网络相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes

Introduction

The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.

Objective

The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).

Method

Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1 = 201 students, sample 2 = 319 working people, sample 3 = 527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.

Results

The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).

Conclusion

This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
期刊最新文献
Trait authenticity as an “enzyme” for personal resources and work engagement: A study among teachers within the framework of the job demands-resources model Guilt-proneness and self-management behaviour: The moderating role of sense of belonging Editorial Board Induction émotionnelle positive et production d’inférences : étude chez des enfants de 9 à 11 ans The context- and emotion-specific assessment of emotion regulation in adolescents (CESAER-A): Validation in a sample of early to late adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1