早期阿尔茨海默病的预后和预测因素:系统回顾

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2024-02-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/ADR-230045
Maria João Garcia, Regina Leadley, Janine Ross, Sasha Bozeat, Gabrielle Redhead, Oskar Hansson, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Nicolas Villain, Jeffrey Cummings
{"title":"早期阿尔茨海默病的预后和预测因素:系统回顾","authors":"Maria João Garcia, Regina Leadley, Janine Ross, Sasha Bozeat, Gabrielle Redhead, Oskar Hansson, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Nicolas Villain, Jeffrey Cummings","doi":"10.3233/ADR-230045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes progressive decline of cognition and function. There is a lack of systematic literature reviews on prognostic and predictive factors in its early clinical stages (eAD), i.e., mild cognitive impairment due to AD and mild AD dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify prognostic factors affecting eAD progression and predictive factors for treatment efficacy and safety of approved and/or under late-stage development disease-modifying treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched (August 2022) for studies reporting prognostic factors associated with eAD progression and predictive factors for treatment response. The Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool or the Cochrane risk of bias tool were used to assess risk of bias. Two reviewers independently screened the records. A single reviewer performed data extraction and quality assessment. A second performed a 20% check. Content experts reviewed and interpreted the data collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one studies were included. Self-reporting, diagnosis definition, and missing data led to high risk of bias. Population size ranged from 110 to 11,451. Analyses found data indicating that older age was and depression may be associated with progression. Greater baseline cognitive impairment was associated with progression. <i>APOE4</i> may be a prognostic factor, a predictive factor for treatment efficacy and predicts an adverse response (ARIA). Elevated biomarkers (CSF/plasma p-tau, CSF t-tau, and plasma neurofilament light) were associated with disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age was the strongest risk factor for progression. Biomarkers were associated with progression, supporting their use in trial selection and aiding diagnosis. Baseline cognitive impairment was a prognostic factor. <i>APOE4</i> predicted ARIA, aligning with emerging evidence and relevant to treatment initiation/monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"203-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria João Garcia, Regina Leadley, Janine Ross, Sasha Bozeat, Gabrielle Redhead, Oskar Hansson, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Nicolas Villain, Jeffrey Cummings\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ADR-230045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes progressive decline of cognition and function. There is a lack of systematic literature reviews on prognostic and predictive factors in its early clinical stages (eAD), i.e., mild cognitive impairment due to AD and mild AD dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify prognostic factors affecting eAD progression and predictive factors for treatment efficacy and safety of approved and/or under late-stage development disease-modifying treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched (August 2022) for studies reporting prognostic factors associated with eAD progression and predictive factors for treatment response. The Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool or the Cochrane risk of bias tool were used to assess risk of bias. Two reviewers independently screened the records. A single reviewer performed data extraction and quality assessment. A second performed a 20% check. Content experts reviewed and interpreted the data collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one studies were included. Self-reporting, diagnosis definition, and missing data led to high risk of bias. Population size ranged from 110 to 11,451. Analyses found data indicating that older age was and depression may be associated with progression. Greater baseline cognitive impairment was associated with progression. <i>APOE4</i> may be a prognostic factor, a predictive factor for treatment efficacy and predicts an adverse response (ARIA). Elevated biomarkers (CSF/plasma p-tau, CSF t-tau, and plasma neurofilament light) were associated with disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age was the strongest risk factor for progression. Biomarkers were associated with progression, supporting their use in trial selection and aiding diagnosis. Baseline cognitive impairment was a prognostic factor. <i>APOE4</i> predicted ARIA, aligning with emerging evidence and relevant to treatment initiation/monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"203-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-230045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-230045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)会导致认知能力和功能逐渐下降。目前尚缺乏关于早期临床阶段(eAD),即AD所致轻度认知障碍和轻度AD痴呆的预后和预测因素的系统文献综述:目的:确定影响 eAD 进展的预后因素,以及已批准和/或处于后期开发阶段的改变病情疗法的疗效和安全性的预测因素:在数据库中检索(2022 年 8 月)报告与 eAD 进展相关的预后因素和治疗反应预测因素的研究。采用预后因素研究质量工具或Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。两名审稿人独立筛选记录。一名审稿人负责数据提取和质量评估。第二位审稿人进行 20% 的检查。内容专家对收集到的数据进行了审查和解释:结果:共纳入 61 项研究。自我报告、诊断定义和数据缺失导致偏倚风险较高。研究对象人数从 110 到 11,451 不等。分析发现,有数据表明,高龄和抑郁可能与病情进展有关。更严重的基线认知障碍与病情进展有关。APOE4 可能是一个预后因素、治疗效果的预测因素和不良反应(ARIA)的预测因素。生物标志物(CSF/血浆p-tau、CSF t-tau和血浆神经丝光)的升高与疾病进展有关:结论:年龄是疾病进展的最大风险因素。结论:年龄是病情恶化的最大风险因素。生物标志物与病情恶化相关,支持将其用于试验选择和辅助诊断。基线认知障碍是一个预后因素。APOE4可预测ARIA,这与新出现的证据一致,并与治疗启动/监测相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes progressive decline of cognition and function. There is a lack of systematic literature reviews on prognostic and predictive factors in its early clinical stages (eAD), i.e., mild cognitive impairment due to AD and mild AD dementia.

Objective: To identify prognostic factors affecting eAD progression and predictive factors for treatment efficacy and safety of approved and/or under late-stage development disease-modifying treatments.

Methods: Databases were searched (August 2022) for studies reporting prognostic factors associated with eAD progression and predictive factors for treatment response. The Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool or the Cochrane risk of bias tool were used to assess risk of bias. Two reviewers independently screened the records. A single reviewer performed data extraction and quality assessment. A second performed a 20% check. Content experts reviewed and interpreted the data collected.

Results: Sixty-one studies were included. Self-reporting, diagnosis definition, and missing data led to high risk of bias. Population size ranged from 110 to 11,451. Analyses found data indicating that older age was and depression may be associated with progression. Greater baseline cognitive impairment was associated with progression. APOE4 may be a prognostic factor, a predictive factor for treatment efficacy and predicts an adverse response (ARIA). Elevated biomarkers (CSF/plasma p-tau, CSF t-tau, and plasma neurofilament light) were associated with disease progression.

Conclusions: Age was the strongest risk factor for progression. Biomarkers were associated with progression, supporting their use in trial selection and aiding diagnosis. Baseline cognitive impairment was a prognostic factor. APOE4 predicted ARIA, aligning with emerging evidence and relevant to treatment initiation/monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarker Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies by the Immunomagnetic Reduction Assay and Clinical Measures. Cognitive Reserve Relationship with Physical Performance in Dementia-Free Older Adults: The MIND-China Study. Are Opioids Agitating? A Data Analysis of Baseline Data from the STAN Study. Cognitive Function After Stopping Folic Acid and DHA Intervention: An Extended Follow-Up Results from the Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Individualized and Biomarker-Based Prognosis of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1