白塞氏葡萄膜炎免疫抑制疗法的药物保留时间

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1080/09273948.2024.2315205
Donald Tran, Sophie Rogers, Lyndell L Lim
{"title":"白塞氏葡萄膜炎免疫抑制疗法的药物保留时间","authors":"Donald Tran, Sophie Rogers, Lyndell L Lim","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2024.2315205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Behcet's Disease is a chronic multisystem vasculitis associated with a blinding uveitis. Few comparative studies exist between conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs in Behcet's uveitis (BU). We therefore used drug retention time (DRT), an accepted surrogate measure of pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, to compare these treatments in patients with BU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of patients who met the revised International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD) treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia, between 1985-2021. DRT was analysed with Kaplan-Meier plots and defined as total time on drug in the first medication-period for each DMARD in each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients (37 males) with median age of 28.6 years were followed-up for a median of 8.0 years. At initial presentation, half had bilateral disease and median logMAR visual acuity was 0.176 (Snellen 6/9) in 62 uveitic eyes (16 anterior uveitis, 11 intermediate, 2 posterior, and 33 panuveitis). Thirty-three patients met ICBD initially. Prescribed corticosteroid-sparing agents were Cyclosporin (<i>N</i> = 24), Mycophenolate (<i>N</i> = 22), Azathioprine (<i>N</i> = 22), Methotrexate (<i>N</i> = 16), and Adalimumab (<i>N</i> = 15). Median DRT was 14.0, 27.4, 8.3, 24.0, and 52.0 months, respectively. DMARDs were discontinued 116 times and adverse effects (<i>N</i> = 37) were the main reason for cessation. Over time, patients were switched from Cyclosporin to Adalimumab earlier in the disease course due to poorer tolerance of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adalimumab's drug retention time was found to be similar to and possibly better than cDMARDs in patients with BU, who often suffer from vision-threatening disease at first presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Retention Time of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Behcet's Uveitis.\",\"authors\":\"Donald Tran, Sophie Rogers, Lyndell L Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273948.2024.2315205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Behcet's Disease is a chronic multisystem vasculitis associated with a blinding uveitis. Few comparative studies exist between conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs in Behcet's uveitis (BU). We therefore used drug retention time (DRT), an accepted surrogate measure of pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, to compare these treatments in patients with BU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of patients who met the revised International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD) treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia, between 1985-2021. DRT was analysed with Kaplan-Meier plots and defined as total time on drug in the first medication-period for each DMARD in each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients (37 males) with median age of 28.6 years were followed-up for a median of 8.0 years. At initial presentation, half had bilateral disease and median logMAR visual acuity was 0.176 (Snellen 6/9) in 62 uveitic eyes (16 anterior uveitis, 11 intermediate, 2 posterior, and 33 panuveitis). Thirty-three patients met ICBD initially. Prescribed corticosteroid-sparing agents were Cyclosporin (<i>N</i> = 24), Mycophenolate (<i>N</i> = 22), Azathioprine (<i>N</i> = 22), Methotrexate (<i>N</i> = 16), and Adalimumab (<i>N</i> = 15). Median DRT was 14.0, 27.4, 8.3, 24.0, and 52.0 months, respectively. DMARDs were discontinued 116 times and adverse effects (<i>N</i> = 37) were the main reason for cessation. Over time, patients were switched from Cyclosporin to Adalimumab earlier in the disease course due to poorer tolerance of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adalimumab's drug retention time was found to be similar to and possibly better than cDMARDs in patients with BU, who often suffer from vision-threatening disease at first presentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2024.2315205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2024.2315205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:白塞氏病是一种伴有致盲性葡萄膜炎的慢性多系统血管炎。在白塞氏葡萄膜炎(BU)的治疗中,传统的改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)和生物DMARDs之间的比较研究很少。因此,我们使用药物保留时间(DRT)--一种公认的药理疗效和耐受性替代指标--来比较这些治疗方法在白塞氏葡萄膜炎患者中的疗效:方法:对1985-2021年间在澳大利亚维多利亚皇家眼耳医院接受治疗的符合修订版国际白塞氏病(ICBD)标准的患者进行回顾性病历审查。DRT 采用 Kaplan-Meier 图进行分析,定义为每位患者每种 DMARD 在第一个用药期的总用药时间:48 名患者(37 名男性)的中位年龄为 28.6 岁,随访时间中位数为 8.0 年。62只葡萄膜炎眼(16只前葡萄膜炎眼、11只中度葡萄膜炎眼、2只后部葡萄膜炎眼和33只泛葡萄膜炎眼)的中位数logMAR视力为0.176(斯奈伦6/9)。33 名患者最初符合 ICBD 标准。处方的皮质类固醇替代药物包括环孢素(24 例)、霉酚酸酯(22 例)、硫唑嘌呤(22 例)、甲氨蝶呤(16 例)和阿达木单抗(15 例)。DRT中位数分别为14.0、27.4、8.3、24.0和52.0个月。DMARDs停药116次,不良反应(37例)是停药的主要原因。随着时间的推移,由于对不良反应的耐受性较差,患者在病程的早期就从环孢素换成了阿达木单抗:结论:阿达木单抗的药物保留时间与cDMARDs相似,甚至可能优于cDMARDs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug Retention Time of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Behcet's Uveitis.

Purpose: Behcet's Disease is a chronic multisystem vasculitis associated with a blinding uveitis. Few comparative studies exist between conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs in Behcet's uveitis (BU). We therefore used drug retention time (DRT), an accepted surrogate measure of pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, to compare these treatments in patients with BU.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who met the revised International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD) treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia, between 1985-2021. DRT was analysed with Kaplan-Meier plots and defined as total time on drug in the first medication-period for each DMARD in each patient.

Results: Forty-eight patients (37 males) with median age of 28.6 years were followed-up for a median of 8.0 years. At initial presentation, half had bilateral disease and median logMAR visual acuity was 0.176 (Snellen 6/9) in 62 uveitic eyes (16 anterior uveitis, 11 intermediate, 2 posterior, and 33 panuveitis). Thirty-three patients met ICBD initially. Prescribed corticosteroid-sparing agents were Cyclosporin (N = 24), Mycophenolate (N = 22), Azathioprine (N = 22), Methotrexate (N = 16), and Adalimumab (N = 15). Median DRT was 14.0, 27.4, 8.3, 24.0, and 52.0 months, respectively. DMARDs were discontinued 116 times and adverse effects (N = 37) were the main reason for cessation. Over time, patients were switched from Cyclosporin to Adalimumab earlier in the disease course due to poorer tolerance of adverse events.

Conclusion: Adalimumab's drug retention time was found to be similar to and possibly better than cDMARDs in patients with BU, who often suffer from vision-threatening disease at first presentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
期刊最新文献
Incidence and Outcomes of Cataract in Eyes with Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid. Revisiting the Utility of Inpatient Screening for Ocular Candidiasis: An Eight-Year Retrospective Study. Bilateral Acute Myopia: Do Not Overlook Bilateral Uveal Effusion. Acute Unilateral Hypertensive Uveitis in Leptospirosis: A Case Report. Intermediate Uveitis with Cystoid Macular Edema as Presentation of Retained Caterpillar Hair in the Vitreous Cavity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1