男性比女性更重视晋升

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1002/job.2781
Dinah Gutermuth, Melvyn R. W. Hamstra
{"title":"男性比女性更重视晋升","authors":"Dinah Gutermuth,&nbsp;Melvyn R. W. Hamstra","doi":"10.1002/job.2781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this research, we test the hypothesis that promotion-focused eagerness does not yield the same evaluative benefits in the workplace for women as it does for men. Regulatory focus theory suggests that promotion-focused eagerness potentially casts a person in a favorable light in the eyes of superiors. Nevertheless, we propose that promotion-focused eagerness violates the prescriptive gender-stereotypical expectations that people have of women. The gender deviance (i.e., not acting in line with gender expectations) that occurs when a woman is promotion-focused causes this woman to pay a “gender tax” that a promotion-focused man does not pay. First, we conducted two experiments wherein managers (<i>N</i> = 127) or students (<i>N</i> = 236) evaluated qualified fictional job applicants: in both experiments, compared with an identical male applicant, the promotion-focused female job applicant was valued less, as evidenced by a lower starting salary offer. Second, in a dyadic study (<i>N</i> = 474 dyads), male employees' promotion focus was positively associated with their manager's evaluations of them, whereas female employees' promotion focus was not. Our results show that promotion-focused women are not valued as positively as their male counterparts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promotion focus is valued in men more than in women\",\"authors\":\"Dinah Gutermuth,&nbsp;Melvyn R. W. Hamstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/job.2781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In this research, we test the hypothesis that promotion-focused eagerness does not yield the same evaluative benefits in the workplace for women as it does for men. Regulatory focus theory suggests that promotion-focused eagerness potentially casts a person in a favorable light in the eyes of superiors. Nevertheless, we propose that promotion-focused eagerness violates the prescriptive gender-stereotypical expectations that people have of women. The gender deviance (i.e., not acting in line with gender expectations) that occurs when a woman is promotion-focused causes this woman to pay a “gender tax” that a promotion-focused man does not pay. First, we conducted two experiments wherein managers (<i>N</i> = 127) or students (<i>N</i> = 236) evaluated qualified fictional job applicants: in both experiments, compared with an identical male applicant, the promotion-focused female job applicant was valued less, as evidenced by a lower starting salary offer. Second, in a dyadic study (<i>N</i> = 474 dyads), male employees' promotion focus was positively associated with their manager's evaluations of them, whereas female employees' promotion focus was not. Our results show that promotion-focused women are not valued as positively as their male counterparts.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即女性在职场中的晋升焦虑并不会像男性一样带来评价上的好处。监管焦点理论认为,注重晋升的渴望可能会让一个人在上级眼中处于有利地位。然而,我们认为,晋升渴望违反了人们对女性的性别陈规定型期望。当女性以晋升为重点时,其性别偏差(即行为不符合性别期望)会导致该女性支付 "性别税",而以晋升为重点的男性则不需要支付这种税。首先,我们进行了两项实验,让经理(N = 127)或学生(N = 236)对合格的虚构求职者进行评估:在这两项实验中,与相同的男性求职者相比,注重晋升的女性求职者的价值较低,表现为起薪较低。其次,在一项双人研究(N = 474 人)中,男性员工的晋升焦点与经理对他们的评价呈正相关,而女性员工的晋升焦点则与之无关。我们的研究结果表明,注重晋升的女性并不像她们的男性同事那样得到积极的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Promotion focus is valued in men more than in women

In this research, we test the hypothesis that promotion-focused eagerness does not yield the same evaluative benefits in the workplace for women as it does for men. Regulatory focus theory suggests that promotion-focused eagerness potentially casts a person in a favorable light in the eyes of superiors. Nevertheless, we propose that promotion-focused eagerness violates the prescriptive gender-stereotypical expectations that people have of women. The gender deviance (i.e., not acting in line with gender expectations) that occurs when a woman is promotion-focused causes this woman to pay a “gender tax” that a promotion-focused man does not pay. First, we conducted two experiments wherein managers (N = 127) or students (N = 236) evaluated qualified fictional job applicants: in both experiments, compared with an identical male applicant, the promotion-focused female job applicant was valued less, as evidenced by a lower starting salary offer. Second, in a dyadic study (N = 474 dyads), male employees' promotion focus was positively associated with their manager's evaluations of them, whereas female employees' promotion focus was not. Our results show that promotion-focused women are not valued as positively as their male counterparts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Getting away “Scott” (but not Susan) free: The effects of safety-specific abusive supervision and supervisor gender on follower attributions and safety outcomes How and when do frequent daily work interruptions contribute to or undermine daily job satisfaction? A stress appraisal perspective Algorithmic management in the gig economy: A systematic review and research integration To escape the pain: Paths to voluntary turnover, social pain, and influences on the selection of a new job role
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1