低速加载下的丝瓜络/环氧树脂复合材料冲击行为分析

IF 2.3 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Applied Composite Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1007/s10443-024-10209-0
Massinissa Grabi, Ahmed Chellil, Samir Lecheb, Hocine Grabi, Abdelkader Nour
{"title":"低速加载下的丝瓜络/环氧树脂复合材料冲击行为分析","authors":"Massinissa Grabi, Ahmed Chellil, Samir Lecheb, Hocine Grabi, Abdelkader Nour","doi":"10.1007/s10443-024-10209-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Luffa cylindrical (LC) has an exceptionally multipartite architecture, a hierarchical and light structure, and a low density. Such a structure is potentially suitable to replace conventional porous-type composites for low-energy absorption and material reinforcement applications. This paper presents an experimental study of the impact behavior of four different luffa/epoxy composites, named (A), (B), (C), and (D) subjected to low-velocity impact (LVI) at energies ranging from barely visible impact damage (BVID) to perforation (5,15, and 20J). Acoustic emission (AE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and digital image correlation (DIC) were introduced to the indentation test to offer additional information on damage mechanisms and on strain and displacement fields since the LVI test has a short duration and real-time damage monitoring is not always achievable. The results showed that the values of the peak force of laminates (A), (B), and (D) are relatively lower compared to laminates (C). In the case of perforation impact energy (20J), the Coefficients of Restitution (CoR) of composites (A), (B), and (D) are equal to 0, which indicates that the nature of the impact is completely plastic, except for composite (C) had a value of 0.11, and a lower degree of damage at all impact energies. Composites (C) exhibit the highest impact resistance, followed by composites (A), while composites (D) display the highest energy absorption, followed by composites (B). Multivariable statistical analysis of the AE signals identified four classes of damage: matrix cracking, fiber-matrix debonding, delamination, and fiber breakage. The damage modes found by AE are well presented and proven by SEM analysis. The luffa fiber-reinforced composite has better impact properties than other natural fiber-reinforced composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":468,"journal":{"name":"Applied Composite Materials","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact Behavior Analysis of Luffa/Epoxy Composites Under Low-Velocity Loading\",\"authors\":\"Massinissa Grabi, Ahmed Chellil, Samir Lecheb, Hocine Grabi, Abdelkader Nour\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10443-024-10209-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Luffa cylindrical (LC) has an exceptionally multipartite architecture, a hierarchical and light structure, and a low density. Such a structure is potentially suitable to replace conventional porous-type composites for low-energy absorption and material reinforcement applications. This paper presents an experimental study of the impact behavior of four different luffa/epoxy composites, named (A), (B), (C), and (D) subjected to low-velocity impact (LVI) at energies ranging from barely visible impact damage (BVID) to perforation (5,15, and 20J). Acoustic emission (AE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and digital image correlation (DIC) were introduced to the indentation test to offer additional information on damage mechanisms and on strain and displacement fields since the LVI test has a short duration and real-time damage monitoring is not always achievable. The results showed that the values of the peak force of laminates (A), (B), and (D) are relatively lower compared to laminates (C). In the case of perforation impact energy (20J), the Coefficients of Restitution (CoR) of composites (A), (B), and (D) are equal to 0, which indicates that the nature of the impact is completely plastic, except for composite (C) had a value of 0.11, and a lower degree of damage at all impact energies. Composites (C) exhibit the highest impact resistance, followed by composites (A), while composites (D) display the highest energy absorption, followed by composites (B). Multivariable statistical analysis of the AE signals identified four classes of damage: matrix cracking, fiber-matrix debonding, delamination, and fiber breakage. The damage modes found by AE are well presented and proven by SEM analysis. The luffa fiber-reinforced composite has better impact properties than other natural fiber-reinforced composites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Composite Materials\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Composite Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-024-10209-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Composite Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-024-10209-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圆柱形丝瓜(Luffa cylindrical,LC)具有特殊的多组分结构、层次分明的轻质结构和低密度。这种结构有可能取代传统的多孔复合材料,用于低能量吸收和材料增强应用。本文介绍了四种不同的丝瓜/环氧复合材料(分别命名为 (A)、(B)、(C) 和 (D))在低速冲击(LVI)下的冲击行为实验研究,冲击能量范围从几乎看不见的冲击损伤(BVID)到穿孔(5、15 和 20J)。声发射(AE)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和数字图像相关(DIC)被引入到压痕试验中,以提供有关损伤机制以及应变和位移场的额外信息,因为 LVI 试验持续时间较短,并不总能实现实时损伤监测。结果表明,与层压板(C)相比,层压板(A)、(B)和(D)的峰值力值相对较低。在穿孔冲击能量(20J)的情况下,复合材料(A)、(B)和(D)的恢复系数(CoR)均等于 0,这表明冲击的性质完全是塑性的,只有复合材料(C)的值为 0.11,在所有冲击能量下的损坏程度都较低。复合材料(C)显示出最高的抗冲击性,其次是复合材料(A),而复合材料(D)显示出最高的能量吸收性,其次是复合材料(B)。对 AE 信号的多变量统计分析确定了四类损伤:基体开裂、纤维-基体脱粘、分层和纤维断裂。通过 AE 发现的损坏模式在 SEM 分析中得到了很好的呈现和证明。与其他天然纤维增强复合材料相比,丝瓜纤维增强复合材料具有更好的冲击性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact Behavior Analysis of Luffa/Epoxy Composites Under Low-Velocity Loading

Luffa cylindrical (LC) has an exceptionally multipartite architecture, a hierarchical and light structure, and a low density. Such a structure is potentially suitable to replace conventional porous-type composites for low-energy absorption and material reinforcement applications. This paper presents an experimental study of the impact behavior of four different luffa/epoxy composites, named (A), (B), (C), and (D) subjected to low-velocity impact (LVI) at energies ranging from barely visible impact damage (BVID) to perforation (5,15, and 20J). Acoustic emission (AE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and digital image correlation (DIC) were introduced to the indentation test to offer additional information on damage mechanisms and on strain and displacement fields since the LVI test has a short duration and real-time damage monitoring is not always achievable. The results showed that the values of the peak force of laminates (A), (B), and (D) are relatively lower compared to laminates (C). In the case of perforation impact energy (20J), the Coefficients of Restitution (CoR) of composites (A), (B), and (D) are equal to 0, which indicates that the nature of the impact is completely plastic, except for composite (C) had a value of 0.11, and a lower degree of damage at all impact energies. Composites (C) exhibit the highest impact resistance, followed by composites (A), while composites (D) display the highest energy absorption, followed by composites (B). Multivariable statistical analysis of the AE signals identified four classes of damage: matrix cracking, fiber-matrix debonding, delamination, and fiber breakage. The damage modes found by AE are well presented and proven by SEM analysis. The luffa fiber-reinforced composite has better impact properties than other natural fiber-reinforced composites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Composite Materials
Applied Composite Materials 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Applied Composite Materials is an international journal dedicated to the publication of original full-length papers, review articles and short communications of the highest quality that advance the development and application of engineering composite materials. Its articles identify problems that limit the performance and reliability of the composite material and composite part; and propose solutions that lead to innovation in design and the successful exploitation and commercialization of composite materials across the widest spectrum of engineering uses. The main focus is on the quantitative descriptions of material systems and processing routes. Coverage includes management of time-dependent changes in microscopic and macroscopic structure and its exploitation from the material''s conception through to its eventual obsolescence.
期刊最新文献
A Coupled Elastoplastic-Damage Analytical Model for 3D Resin-Matrix Woven Composites Effect of Temperature on the Mixed mode I/II Translaminar Fracture of Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Cotton Fibers Experimental Characterisation of Cure-Dependent Spring-Back Behaviour of Metal-Composite Laminates in a Hot-Pressing Process Cutting Force Model of SiCp/Al Composites in Ultrasonic Elliptical Vibration Assisted Cutting with Negative Rake Angle Experimental and Simulation Analysis of the Mechanical Deterioration Mechanisms in SiCp/A356 Composites Under Thermal Cycling Load
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1