{"title":"跨国公司的企业社会创新:未来研究框架","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although multinational enterprises (MNEs) can exacerbate inequality within and across nations, they can also engage in social innovation to contribute positively to SDGs. Their social initiatives addressing societal challenges, i.e., Corporate Social Innovations (CSIs), can benefit both the firm and the society. However, with increasing pressures on MNEs to demonstrate how they meet grand societal challenges, we need to know more about how MNEs pursue their CSIs. By reviewing 34 articles in 18 journals over a 22-year period, we establish what shapes CSI by social change agents, and the conditions for, and consequences of such innovations in MNEs. The review demonstrates that CSI by MNEs is triggered by institutional contradictions or a market opportunity, shaped by (in)formal resources and skills deployed to generate ideas, piloted through multistakeholder engagement, and legitimated through showcasing and framing to generate impact that contributes to SDGs. Our findings set an agenda for future research on the links between CSI activities and different CSI stages and the complex dynamics arising in MNE strategies aimed at reconciling opposing institutional logics and the impact of MNE home institutional contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"33 5","pages":"Article 102273"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000209/pdfft?md5=684787fd68c9f361f12abfdbbe513196&pid=1-s2.0-S0969593124000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate social innovation by multinationals: A framework for future research\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although multinational enterprises (MNEs) can exacerbate inequality within and across nations, they can also engage in social innovation to contribute positively to SDGs. Their social initiatives addressing societal challenges, i.e., Corporate Social Innovations (CSIs), can benefit both the firm and the society. However, with increasing pressures on MNEs to demonstrate how they meet grand societal challenges, we need to know more about how MNEs pursue their CSIs. By reviewing 34 articles in 18 journals over a 22-year period, we establish what shapes CSI by social change agents, and the conditions for, and consequences of such innovations in MNEs. The review demonstrates that CSI by MNEs is triggered by institutional contradictions or a market opportunity, shaped by (in)formal resources and skills deployed to generate ideas, piloted through multistakeholder engagement, and legitimated through showcasing and framing to generate impact that contributes to SDGs. Our findings set an agenda for future research on the links between CSI activities and different CSI stages and the complex dynamics arising in MNE strategies aimed at reconciling opposing institutional logics and the impact of MNE home institutional contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000209/pdfft?md5=684787fd68c9f361f12abfdbbe513196&pid=1-s2.0-S0969593124000209-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000209\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corporate social innovation by multinationals: A framework for future research
Although multinational enterprises (MNEs) can exacerbate inequality within and across nations, they can also engage in social innovation to contribute positively to SDGs. Their social initiatives addressing societal challenges, i.e., Corporate Social Innovations (CSIs), can benefit both the firm and the society. However, with increasing pressures on MNEs to demonstrate how they meet grand societal challenges, we need to know more about how MNEs pursue their CSIs. By reviewing 34 articles in 18 journals over a 22-year period, we establish what shapes CSI by social change agents, and the conditions for, and consequences of such innovations in MNEs. The review demonstrates that CSI by MNEs is triggered by institutional contradictions or a market opportunity, shaped by (in)formal resources and skills deployed to generate ideas, piloted through multistakeholder engagement, and legitimated through showcasing and framing to generate impact that contributes to SDGs. Our findings set an agenda for future research on the links between CSI activities and different CSI stages and the complex dynamics arising in MNE strategies aimed at reconciling opposing institutional logics and the impact of MNE home institutional contexts.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.