在线劳动力市场中的实际激励:个人和群体的惩罚与奖励

IF 7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Mis Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.25300/misq/2023/15166
Matthew J. Hashim and Jesse C. Bockstedt
{"title":"在线劳动力市场中的实际激励:个人和群体的惩罚与奖励","authors":"Matthew J. Hashim and Jesse C. Bockstedt","doi":"10.25300/misq/2023/15166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<style>#html-body [data-pb-style=FO0WS48]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll}</style>Online labor markets and the humans that power them serve a critical role in the advancement of artificial intelligence and supervised machine learning via the creation of useful training datasets. The use of human effort in online labor markets is not enough, however, as a key factor is understanding the possible interventions that market operators can leverage to incentivize human effort among their labor force. We propose that platforms could implement mechanisms such as rewards or punishments at individual or group levels to incentivize real-effort and output. We apply our interventions using a collaborative image tagging experiment—a folksonomy—and the results provide interesting insights and nonobvious consequences. On average, interventions applied at the group level outperformed interventions applied at the individual level. Punishing the group provided the most controversial incentive strategy and provided a nonobvious significant improvement in effort. Rewarding or sanctioning an individual had similar effects on average, with both treatments leading to significant increases in effort post-intervention. In contrast to predictions, sanctioning appears to have significantly motivated those that were punished. Overall, the interventions applied in our real-effort collaborative image tagging experiment had a significant impact on behavior, which provides guidance for online labor market operators and the use of incentives in the creation of labeled machine learning training datasets.","PeriodicalId":49807,"journal":{"name":"Mis Quarterly","volume":"2010 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Effort Incentives in Online Labor Markets: Punishments and Rewards for Individuals and Groups\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Hashim and Jesse C. Bockstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.25300/misq/2023/15166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<style>#html-body [data-pb-style=FO0WS48]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll}</style>Online labor markets and the humans that power them serve a critical role in the advancement of artificial intelligence and supervised machine learning via the creation of useful training datasets. The use of human effort in online labor markets is not enough, however, as a key factor is understanding the possible interventions that market operators can leverage to incentivize human effort among their labor force. We propose that platforms could implement mechanisms such as rewards or punishments at individual or group levels to incentivize real-effort and output. We apply our interventions using a collaborative image tagging experiment—a folksonomy—and the results provide interesting insights and nonobvious consequences. On average, interventions applied at the group level outperformed interventions applied at the individual level. Punishing the group provided the most controversial incentive strategy and provided a nonobvious significant improvement in effort. Rewarding or sanctioning an individual had similar effects on average, with both treatments leading to significant increases in effort post-intervention. In contrast to predictions, sanctioning appears to have significantly motivated those that were punished. Overall, the interventions applied in our real-effort collaborative image tagging experiment had a significant impact on behavior, which provides guidance for online labor market operators and the use of incentives in the creation of labeled machine learning training datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mis Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"2010 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mis Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/15166\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mis Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/15166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

#html-body [data-pb-style=FO0WS48]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll} 在线劳动力市场和为其提供动力的人类通过创建有用的训练数据集,在人工智能和有监督机器学习的发展中发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,仅在在线劳动力市场上使用人力是不够的,一个关键因素是了解市场运营商可以利用哪些可能的干预措施来激励劳动力中的人力。我们建议,平台可以在个人或群体层面实施奖励或惩罚等机制,以激励实际努力和产出。我们使用协作式图片标记实验--即民俗学--来应用我们的干预措施,结果提供了有趣的见解和非显而易见的后果。平均而言,在群体层面采取的干预措施优于在个人层面采取的干预措施。惩罚群体是最有争议的激励策略,对努力程度的改善并不明显。奖励或惩罚个人的平均效果相似,两种方法都能显著提高干预后的努力程度。与预测不同的是,制裁似乎极大地激励了那些受到惩罚的人。总之,我们在真实努力协作图像标记实验中采用的干预措施对行为产生了显著影响,这为在线劳动力市场运营商以及在创建标记机器学习训练数据集时使用激励措施提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-Effort Incentives in Online Labor Markets: Punishments and Rewards for Individuals and Groups
Online labor markets and the humans that power them serve a critical role in the advancement of artificial intelligence and supervised machine learning via the creation of useful training datasets. The use of human effort in online labor markets is not enough, however, as a key factor is understanding the possible interventions that market operators can leverage to incentivize human effort among their labor force. We propose that platforms could implement mechanisms such as rewards or punishments at individual or group levels to incentivize real-effort and output. We apply our interventions using a collaborative image tagging experiment—a folksonomy—and the results provide interesting insights and nonobvious consequences. On average, interventions applied at the group level outperformed interventions applied at the individual level. Punishing the group provided the most controversial incentive strategy and provided a nonobvious significant improvement in effort. Rewarding or sanctioning an individual had similar effects on average, with both treatments leading to significant increases in effort post-intervention. In contrast to predictions, sanctioning appears to have significantly motivated those that were punished. Overall, the interventions applied in our real-effort collaborative image tagging experiment had a significant impact on behavior, which provides guidance for online labor market operators and the use of incentives in the creation of labeled machine learning training datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mis Quarterly
Mis Quarterly 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Name: MIS Quarterly Editorial Objective: The editorial objective of MIS Quarterly is focused on: Enhancing and communicating knowledge related to: Development of IT-based services Management of IT resources Use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications Addressing professional issues affecting the Information Systems (IS) field as a whole Key Focus Areas: Development of IT-based services Management of IT resources Use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications Professional issues affecting the IS field as a whole
期刊最新文献
Engaging Users on Social Media Business Pages: The Roles of User Comments and Firm Responses Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance Dealing with Complexity in Design Science Research: A Methodology Using Design Echelons Data Commoning in the Life Sciences Understanding the Returns from Integrated Enterprise Systems: The Impacts of Agile and Phased Implementation Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1