联合国可持续发展目标 10.2:加纳社会不平等现象分析

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Global Social Welfare Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s40609-024-00334-w
Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi, Maame Efua Quaigua Arthur, Mariama Zaami
{"title":"联合国可持续发展目标 10.2:加纳社会不平等现象分析","authors":"Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi, Maame Efua Quaigua Arthur, Mariama Zaami","doi":"10.1007/s40609-024-00334-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aims at Ghana’s efforts to address inequalities and achieve SDG 10.2 by 2023. It explores Sustainable Development Goal 10.2 on social inequality using Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP). Many low/middle-income countries have focused on poverty and made efforts to eradicate/reduce poverty, but little progress in reducing the inequality gap. Many poor/needy persons/vulnerable persons are excluded from having access to assets across different dimensions and as such realising this goal by 2030 seems almost impossible. Through a qualitative research design, the article used primary and secondary data. The findings revealed the vulnerable in society like the aged, persons living with disabilities, women, and children suffer greater disparity in terms of opportunities like basic services, education, and health. Again, it highlighted Ghana’s effort to reduce inequalities by empowering the underprivileged across social and economic lines to access the necessities of life through various social intervention programmes. Findings revealed these programmes require the coordinated effort of the government and other establishments to implement them within the Ghanaian context. LEAP was identified as a commendable intervention programme that selects vulnerable individuals to reduce the inequality gap. The study recommends that the government make provisions for other funds to cover large-scale the underprivileged in need.</p>","PeriodicalId":51927,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Welfare","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 10.2: Analysis of Social Inequality in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi, Maame Efua Quaigua Arthur, Mariama Zaami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40609-024-00334-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study aims at Ghana’s efforts to address inequalities and achieve SDG 10.2 by 2023. It explores Sustainable Development Goal 10.2 on social inequality using Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP). Many low/middle-income countries have focused on poverty and made efforts to eradicate/reduce poverty, but little progress in reducing the inequality gap. Many poor/needy persons/vulnerable persons are excluded from having access to assets across different dimensions and as such realising this goal by 2030 seems almost impossible. Through a qualitative research design, the article used primary and secondary data. The findings revealed the vulnerable in society like the aged, persons living with disabilities, women, and children suffer greater disparity in terms of opportunities like basic services, education, and health. Again, it highlighted Ghana’s effort to reduce inequalities by empowering the underprivileged across social and economic lines to access the necessities of life through various social intervention programmes. Findings revealed these programmes require the coordinated effort of the government and other establishments to implement them within the Ghanaian context. LEAP was identified as a commendable intervention programme that selects vulnerable individuals to reduce the inequality gap. The study recommends that the government make provisions for other funds to cover large-scale the underprivileged in need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Social Welfare\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Social Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-024-00334-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-024-00334-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解加纳为解决不平等问题和在 2023 年前实现可持续发展目标 10.2 所做的努力。它利用加纳的 "增强生计能力,消除贫困"(LEAP)来探讨关于社会不平等的可持续发展目标 10.2。许多低收入/中等收入国家关注贫困问题,并努力消除/减少贫困,但在缩小不平等差距方面进展甚微。许多穷人/贫困人口/弱势群体被排除在外,无法获得各方面的资产,因此,到 2030 年实现这一目标似乎几乎是不可能的。通过定性研究设计,文章使用了一手和二手数据。研究结果表明,老年人、残疾人、妇女和儿童等社会弱势群体在获得基本服务、教育和健康等机会方面面临着更大的差距。研究结果再次强调了加纳为减少不平等所做的努力,即通过各种社会干预计划,增强社会和经济弱势群体的能力,使他们能够获得生活必需品。研究结果表明,这些计划需要政府和其他机构的协调努力,才能在加纳的国情下实施。LEAP 被认为是一个值得称赞的干预计划,它选择弱势个人来缩小不平等差距。研究建议政府提供其他资金,以大规模覆盖需要帮助的弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 10.2: Analysis of Social Inequality in Ghana

The study aims at Ghana’s efforts to address inequalities and achieve SDG 10.2 by 2023. It explores Sustainable Development Goal 10.2 on social inequality using Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP). Many low/middle-income countries have focused on poverty and made efforts to eradicate/reduce poverty, but little progress in reducing the inequality gap. Many poor/needy persons/vulnerable persons are excluded from having access to assets across different dimensions and as such realising this goal by 2030 seems almost impossible. Through a qualitative research design, the article used primary and secondary data. The findings revealed the vulnerable in society like the aged, persons living with disabilities, women, and children suffer greater disparity in terms of opportunities like basic services, education, and health. Again, it highlighted Ghana’s effort to reduce inequalities by empowering the underprivileged across social and economic lines to access the necessities of life through various social intervention programmes. Findings revealed these programmes require the coordinated effort of the government and other establishments to implement them within the Ghanaian context. LEAP was identified as a commendable intervention programme that selects vulnerable individuals to reduce the inequality gap. The study recommends that the government make provisions for other funds to cover large-scale the underprivileged in need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Welfare
Global Social Welfare SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: This journal brings together research that informs the fields of global social work, social development, and social welfare policy and practice. It serves as an outlet for manuscripts and brief reports of interdisciplinary applied research which advance knowledge about global threats to the well-being of individuals, groups, families and communities. This research spans the full range of problems including global poverty, food and housing insecurity, economic development, environmental safety, social determinants of health, maternal and child health, mental health, addiction, disease and illness, gender and income inequality, human rights and social justice, access to health care and social resources, strengthening care and service delivery, trauma, crises, and responses to natural disasters, war, violence, population movements and trafficking, war and refugees, immigration/migration, human trafficking, orphans and vulnerable children.  Research that recognizes the significant link between individuals, families and communities and their external environments, as well as the interrelatedness of race, cultural, context and poverty, will be particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Menstrual Leave in India: Is It Progressive or Regressive? Social Capital’s Importance in Determining Life Satisfaction in Later Life: A Cross-sectional Study Based on Indian Demography A Qualitative Investigation of the Relationships Between Foster Care Stakeholders and Research Is Maternal Health Care Utilization Necessary for Child Health Outcomes in Tanzania? An Instrumental Variable Approach War-Affected South Sudanese in Settings of Preflight, Flight, and Resettlement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Trauma-Associated Mental Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1