对行为分析师进行 "同情关怀 "培训,以支持护理人员的合作

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Analysis in Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s40617-024-00920-6
Karen Nohelty, Marlena N. Novack, Rachael A. Robinson, Celeste M. Tevis, Dennis R. Dixon
{"title":"对行为分析师进行 \"同情关怀 \"培训,以支持护理人员的合作","authors":"Karen Nohelty, Marlena N. Novack, Rachael A. Robinson, Celeste M. Tevis, Dennis R. Dixon","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-00920-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field has made significant strides in establishing applied behavior analysis (ABA) interventions as evidenced-based practices in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder; however, treatment delivery has been criticized as lacking compassion. Based on research in other fields, approaching caregiver collaboration with compassion may foster collaborative relationships between clinicians and caregivers, who play a vital role in their child’s treatment, and may bolster treatment adherence, satisfaction, and outcomes. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of a compassionate care training for clinicians to support therapeutic relationships with caregivers. Participants included nine clinical supervisors employed at a community-based behavioral health agency. Clinical supervisors were randomly assigned to either an immediate-treatment group or delayed-treatment control group. Clinicians participated in a 5-week training program, which involved didactic instruction, behavior skills training, and acceptance and commitment training. At baseline, postdelay, and posttreatment, caregiver collaboration sessions were recorded, and the clinicians’ use of compassionate care was evaluated using a measure developed for the study. A statistically significant difference in clinicians’ use of compassionate care strategies following intervention was observed. Variability observed in pretreatment compassionate care scores for a single clinician across different caregivers appeared to normalize posttreatment for several clinicians. In addition, marked increases were seen in compassionate care scores for clinicians with lower initial ratings. Although limited to a small sample size, the results of the pilot study demonstrated feasibility of the compassionate care training and revealed an overall positive improvement posttreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compassionate Care Training for Behavior Analysts to Support Caregiver Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Karen Nohelty, Marlena N. Novack, Rachael A. Robinson, Celeste M. Tevis, Dennis R. Dixon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40617-024-00920-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The field has made significant strides in establishing applied behavior analysis (ABA) interventions as evidenced-based practices in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder; however, treatment delivery has been criticized as lacking compassion. Based on research in other fields, approaching caregiver collaboration with compassion may foster collaborative relationships between clinicians and caregivers, who play a vital role in their child’s treatment, and may bolster treatment adherence, satisfaction, and outcomes. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of a compassionate care training for clinicians to support therapeutic relationships with caregivers. Participants included nine clinical supervisors employed at a community-based behavioral health agency. Clinical supervisors were randomly assigned to either an immediate-treatment group or delayed-treatment control group. Clinicians participated in a 5-week training program, which involved didactic instruction, behavior skills training, and acceptance and commitment training. At baseline, postdelay, and posttreatment, caregiver collaboration sessions were recorded, and the clinicians’ use of compassionate care was evaluated using a measure developed for the study. A statistically significant difference in clinicians’ use of compassionate care strategies following intervention was observed. Variability observed in pretreatment compassionate care scores for a single clinician across different caregivers appeared to normalize posttreatment for several clinicians. In addition, marked increases were seen in compassionate care scores for clinicians with lower initial ratings. Although limited to a small sample size, the results of the pilot study demonstrated feasibility of the compassionate care training and revealed an overall positive improvement posttreatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00920-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00920-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应用行为分析(ABA)干预作为治疗自闭症谱系障碍的循证实践,在该领域取得了长足进步;然而,治疗方法却因缺乏同情心而饱受诟病。根据其他领域的研究,以同情的态度对待照顾者的合作可能会促进临床医生与照顾者之间的合作关系,而照顾者在孩子的治疗中扮演着至关重要的角色,这可能会提高治疗的依从性、满意度和治疗效果。本试验性研究的目的是考察对临床医生进行同情关怀培训的影响,以支持与照顾者之间的治疗关系。参与者包括受雇于一家社区行为健康机构的九名临床督导。临床督导被随机分配到即时治疗组或延迟治疗对照组。临床督导参加了为期 5 周的培训项目,其中包括说教、行为技能培训以及接纳和承诺培训。在基线、延迟治疗后和治疗后,对护理人员的合作会议进行了记录,并使用为本研究开发的测量方法对临床医生使用同情护理的情况进行了评估。结果显示,临床医生在接受干预后在使用同情护理策略方面存在明显差异。在治疗前观察到的单个临床医生在不同护理人员之间的爱心护理得分差异,在治疗后似乎在几个临床医生身上趋于正常。此外,初始评分较低的临床医生的仁爱护理得分也有明显提高。尽管样本量较小,但试点研究的结果证明了 "体恤关怀 "培训的可行性,并揭示了治疗后的整体积极改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compassionate Care Training for Behavior Analysts to Support Caregiver Collaboration

The field has made significant strides in establishing applied behavior analysis (ABA) interventions as evidenced-based practices in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder; however, treatment delivery has been criticized as lacking compassion. Based on research in other fields, approaching caregiver collaboration with compassion may foster collaborative relationships between clinicians and caregivers, who play a vital role in their child’s treatment, and may bolster treatment adherence, satisfaction, and outcomes. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of a compassionate care training for clinicians to support therapeutic relationships with caregivers. Participants included nine clinical supervisors employed at a community-based behavioral health agency. Clinical supervisors were randomly assigned to either an immediate-treatment group or delayed-treatment control group. Clinicians participated in a 5-week training program, which involved didactic instruction, behavior skills training, and acceptance and commitment training. At baseline, postdelay, and posttreatment, caregiver collaboration sessions were recorded, and the clinicians’ use of compassionate care was evaluated using a measure developed for the study. A statistically significant difference in clinicians’ use of compassionate care strategies following intervention was observed. Variability observed in pretreatment compassionate care scores for a single clinician across different caregivers appeared to normalize posttreatment for several clinicians. In addition, marked increases were seen in compassionate care scores for clinicians with lower initial ratings. Although limited to a small sample size, the results of the pilot study demonstrated feasibility of the compassionate care training and revealed an overall positive improvement posttreatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Greater Understanding of Trauma-Informed Care in Applied Behavior Analysis: An Introduction to the Special Issue. The Effectiveness of Khan Academy in Teaching Elementary Math Procedural Integrity in Applied Settings: A Survey of Training, Practices, and Barriers Introducing "In Their Own Words" Special Series. Barriers to Careers in Behavior Analysis among Hispanic and Latinx Undergraduate Students: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1