关于 COVID-19 大流行期间围产期心理健康的共识声明以及关于大流行后恢复和重建的建议。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-02-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1347388
Leanne Jackson, Mari Greenfield, Elana Payne, Karen Burgess, Munira Oza, Claire Storey, Siân M Davies, Kaat De Backer, Flora E Kent-Nye, Sabrina Pilav, Semra Worrall, Laura Bridle, Nina Khazaezadeh, Daghni Rajasingam, Lauren E Carson, Leonardo De Pascalis, Victoria Fallon, Julie M Hartley, Elsa Montgomery, Mary Newburn, Claire A Wilson, Joanne A Harrold, Louise M Howard, Jane Sandall, Laura A Magee, Kayleigh S Sheen, Sergio A Silverio
{"title":"关于 COVID-19 大流行期间围产期心理健康的共识声明以及关于大流行后恢复和重建的建议。","authors":"Leanne Jackson, Mari Greenfield, Elana Payne, Karen Burgess, Munira Oza, Claire Storey, Siân M Davies, Kaat De Backer, Flora E Kent-Nye, Sabrina Pilav, Semra Worrall, Laura Bridle, Nina Khazaezadeh, Daghni Rajasingam, Lauren E Carson, Leonardo De Pascalis, Victoria Fallon, Julie M Hartley, Elsa Montgomery, Mary Newburn, Claire A Wilson, Joanne A Harrold, Louise M Howard, Jane Sandall, Laura A Magee, Kayleigh S Sheen, Sergio A Silverio","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1347388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic posed a significant lifecourse rupture, not least to those who had specific physical vulnerabilities to the virus, but also to those who were suffering with mental ill health. Women and birthing people who were pregnant, experienced a perinatal bereavement, or were in the first post-partum year (i.e., perinatal) were exposed to a number of risk factors for mental ill health, including alterations to the way in which their perinatal care was delivered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus statement was derived from a cross-disciplinary collaboration of experts, whereby evidence from collaborative work on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic was synthesised, and priorities were established as recommendations for research, healthcare practice, and policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis of research focused on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal health outcomes and care practices led to three immediate recommendations: what to retain, what to reinstate, and what to remove from perinatal mental healthcare provision. Longer-term recommendations for action were also made, categorised as follows: Equity and Relational Healthcare; Parity of Esteem in Mental and Physical Healthcare with an Emphasis on Specialist Perinatal Services; and Horizon Scanning for Perinatal Mental Health Research, Policy, & Practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The evidence base on the effect of the pandemic on perinatal mental health is growing. This consensus statement synthesises said evidence and makes recommendations for a post-pandemic recovery and re-build of perinatal mental health services and care provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A consensus statement on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and recommendations for post-pandemic recovery and re-build.\",\"authors\":\"Leanne Jackson, Mari Greenfield, Elana Payne, Karen Burgess, Munira Oza, Claire Storey, Siân M Davies, Kaat De Backer, Flora E Kent-Nye, Sabrina Pilav, Semra Worrall, Laura Bridle, Nina Khazaezadeh, Daghni Rajasingam, Lauren E Carson, Leonardo De Pascalis, Victoria Fallon, Julie M Hartley, Elsa Montgomery, Mary Newburn, Claire A Wilson, Joanne A Harrold, Louise M Howard, Jane Sandall, Laura A Magee, Kayleigh S Sheen, Sergio A Silverio\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1347388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic posed a significant lifecourse rupture, not least to those who had specific physical vulnerabilities to the virus, but also to those who were suffering with mental ill health. Women and birthing people who were pregnant, experienced a perinatal bereavement, or were in the first post-partum year (i.e., perinatal) were exposed to a number of risk factors for mental ill health, including alterations to the way in which their perinatal care was delivered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus statement was derived from a cross-disciplinary collaboration of experts, whereby evidence from collaborative work on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic was synthesised, and priorities were established as recommendations for research, healthcare practice, and policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis of research focused on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal health outcomes and care practices led to three immediate recommendations: what to retain, what to reinstate, and what to remove from perinatal mental healthcare provision. Longer-term recommendations for action were also made, categorised as follows: Equity and Relational Healthcare; Parity of Esteem in Mental and Physical Healthcare with an Emphasis on Specialist Perinatal Services; and Horizon Scanning for Perinatal Mental Health Research, Policy, & Practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The evidence base on the effect of the pandemic on perinatal mental health is growing. This consensus statement synthesises said evidence and makes recommendations for a post-pandemic recovery and re-build of perinatal mental health services and care provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1347388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1347388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:COVID-19 大流行造成了生命周期的严重断裂,不仅对那些身体易受病毒感染的人造成了影响,而且对那些精神疾病患者也造成了影响。怀孕、经历围产期丧亲之痛或处于产后第一年(即围产期)的妇女和分娩者面临着许多精神疾病的风险因素,包括围产期护理方式的改变:通过跨学科的专家合作,综合了 COVID-19 大流行期间围产期精神健康合作工作的证据,并确定了研究、医疗实践和政策建议的优先事项,从而形成了一份共识声明:结果:对 COVID-19 大流行对围产期健康结果和护理实践的影响的研究综述提出了三项直接建议:围产期心理保健服务中应保留的内容、应恢复的内容和应取消的内容。此外,还提出了以下长期行动建议:公平和关系医疗;心理和生理医疗中的平等,重点是围产期专业服务;围产期心理健康研究、 政策和实践的地平线扫描:大流行病对围产期心理健康影响的证据基础正在不断扩大。本共识声明综合了上述证据,并就大流行后围产期心理健康服务和护理的恢复与重建提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A consensus statement on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and recommendations for post-pandemic recovery and re-build.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic posed a significant lifecourse rupture, not least to those who had specific physical vulnerabilities to the virus, but also to those who were suffering with mental ill health. Women and birthing people who were pregnant, experienced a perinatal bereavement, or were in the first post-partum year (i.e., perinatal) were exposed to a number of risk factors for mental ill health, including alterations to the way in which their perinatal care was delivered.

Methods: A consensus statement was derived from a cross-disciplinary collaboration of experts, whereby evidence from collaborative work on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic was synthesised, and priorities were established as recommendations for research, healthcare practice, and policy.

Results: The synthesis of research focused on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal health outcomes and care practices led to three immediate recommendations: what to retain, what to reinstate, and what to remove from perinatal mental healthcare provision. Longer-term recommendations for action were also made, categorised as follows: Equity and Relational Healthcare; Parity of Esteem in Mental and Physical Healthcare with an Emphasis on Specialist Perinatal Services; and Horizon Scanning for Perinatal Mental Health Research, Policy, & Practice.

Discussion: The evidence base on the effect of the pandemic on perinatal mental health is growing. This consensus statement synthesises said evidence and makes recommendations for a post-pandemic recovery and re-build of perinatal mental health services and care provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and awareness toward human papillomavirus vaccination among Saudi female nursing students. Aya Contigo: evaluation of a digital intervention to support self-managed medication abortion in Venezuela. Less than one in five teenage women in Ethiopia know about emergency contraception. Determinants of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Bench Sheko zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a case-control study. Diagnostic accuracy of a non-invasive spot-check hemoglobin meter, Masimo Rad-67® pulse CO-Oximeter®, in detection of anemia in antenatal care settings in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1