对克拉霉素敏感和对克拉霉素耐药的幽门螺杆菌菌株混合感染率对克拉霉素根除治疗成功率的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Helicobacter Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/hel.13062
Momoko Tsuda, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Ritsuko Oikawa, Ryosuke Watanabe, Masayuki Higashino, Kimitoshi Kubo, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Fumio Itoh, Mototsugu Kato
{"title":"对克拉霉素敏感和对克拉霉素耐药的幽门螺杆菌菌株混合感染率对克拉霉素根除治疗成功率的影响。","authors":"Momoko Tsuda,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Watanabe,&nbsp;Ritsuko Oikawa,&nbsp;Ryosuke Watanabe,&nbsp;Masayuki Higashino,&nbsp;Kimitoshi Kubo,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Fumio Itoh,&nbsp;Mototsugu Kato","doi":"10.1111/hel.13062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Clarithromycin (CAM) resistance is a major contributor to the failure to eradicate <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i>). The mixed-infection ratio of CAM-susceptible and CAM-resistant <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> strains differs among individuals. Pyrosequencing analysis can be used to quantify gene mutations at position each 2142 and 2143 of the <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> 23S rRNA gene in intragastric fluid samples. Herein, we aimed to clarify the impact of the rate of mixed infection with CAM-susceptible and CAM-resistant <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> strains on the success rate of CAM-containing eradication therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-four <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i>-positive participants who received CAM-based eradication therapy, also comprising vonoprazan and amoxicillin, were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Biopsy and intragastric fluid samples were collected during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> culture and CAM-susceptibility <b>t</b>ests were performed on the biopsy samples, and real-time PCR and pyrosequencing analyses were performed on the intragastric fluid samples. The mutation rates and eradication success rates were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overall CAM-based eradication success rate was 84% (54/64): 62% (13/21) for CAM-resistant strains, and 95% (39/41) for CAM-sensitive strains. When the mutation rate of the 23S rRNA gene was 20% or lower for both positions (2142 and 2143), the eradication success rate was 90% or more. However, when the mutation rate was 20% or higher, the eradication success rate was lower (60%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The mutation rate of the CAM-resistance gene was related to the success of eradication therapy, as determined via pyrosequencing analysis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13223,"journal":{"name":"Helicobacter","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of mixed-infection rate of clarithromycin-susceptible and clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains on the success rate of clarithromycin-based eradication treatment\",\"authors\":\"Momoko Tsuda,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Watanabe,&nbsp;Ritsuko Oikawa,&nbsp;Ryosuke Watanabe,&nbsp;Masayuki Higashino,&nbsp;Kimitoshi Kubo,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Fumio Itoh,&nbsp;Mototsugu Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hel.13062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clarithromycin (CAM) resistance is a major contributor to the failure to eradicate <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i>). The mixed-infection ratio of CAM-susceptible and CAM-resistant <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> strains differs among individuals. Pyrosequencing analysis can be used to quantify gene mutations at position each 2142 and 2143 of the <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> 23S rRNA gene in intragastric fluid samples. Herein, we aimed to clarify the impact of the rate of mixed infection with CAM-susceptible and CAM-resistant <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> strains on the success rate of CAM-containing eradication therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-four <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i>-positive participants who received CAM-based eradication therapy, also comprising vonoprazan and amoxicillin, were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Biopsy and intragastric fluid samples were collected during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. <i>H</i>. <i>pylori</i> culture and CAM-susceptibility <b>t</b>ests were performed on the biopsy samples, and real-time PCR and pyrosequencing analyses were performed on the intragastric fluid samples. The mutation rates and eradication success rates were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The overall CAM-based eradication success rate was 84% (54/64): 62% (13/21) for CAM-resistant strains, and 95% (39/41) for CAM-sensitive strains. When the mutation rate of the 23S rRNA gene was 20% or lower for both positions (2142 and 2143), the eradication success rate was 90% or more. However, when the mutation rate was 20% or higher, the eradication success rate was lower (60%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The mutation rate of the CAM-resistance gene was related to the success of eradication therapy, as determined via pyrosequencing analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Helicobacter\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Helicobacter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.13062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helicobacter","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.13062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:克拉霉素(CAM)耐药性是幽门螺旋杆菌(H. pylori)无法根除的主要原因。对克拉霉素(CAM)敏感的幽门螺杆菌菌株和对克拉霉素(CAM)耐药的幽门螺杆菌菌株的混合感染率因人而异。热测序分析可用于量化胃液样本中幽门螺杆菌 23S rRNA 基因第 2142 和 2143 位的基因突变。在此,我们旨在明确CAM易感和CAM耐药幽门螺杆菌菌株混合感染率对含CAM根除疗法成功率的影响:这项前瞻性队列研究共纳入了 64 名幽门螺杆菌阳性患者,他们都接受了以 CAM 为基础的根除疗法,其中还包括伏诺普拉赞和阿莫西林。在食管胃十二指肠镜检查过程中收集了活检样本和胃液样本。对活检样本进行了幽门螺杆菌培养和 CAM 药敏试验,对胃液样本进行了实时 PCR 和热序列分析。对突变率和根除成功率进行了比较:基于 CAM 的总体根除成功率为 84%(54/64):对 CAM 耐药菌株的根除成功率为 62%(13/21),对 CAM 敏感菌株的根除成功率为 95%(39/41)。当 23S rRNA 基因在两个位置(2142 和 2143)的突变率均为 20% 或更低时,根除成功率为 90% 或更高。然而,当突变率为 20% 或更高时,根除成功率较低(60%):结论:通过热测序分析确定,CAM抗性基因的突变率与根除治疗的成功率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of mixed-infection rate of clarithromycin-susceptible and clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains on the success rate of clarithromycin-based eradication treatment

Background

Clarithromycin (CAM) resistance is a major contributor to the failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The mixed-infection ratio of CAM-susceptible and CAM-resistant H. pylori strains differs among individuals. Pyrosequencing analysis can be used to quantify gene mutations at position each 2142 and 2143 of the H. pylori 23S rRNA gene in intragastric fluid samples. Herein, we aimed to clarify the impact of the rate of mixed infection with CAM-susceptible and CAM-resistant H. pylori strains on the success rate of CAM-containing eradication therapy.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-four H. pylori-positive participants who received CAM-based eradication therapy, also comprising vonoprazan and amoxicillin, were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Biopsy and intragastric fluid samples were collected during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. H. pylori culture and CAM-susceptibility tests were performed on the biopsy samples, and real-time PCR and pyrosequencing analyses were performed on the intragastric fluid samples. The mutation rates and eradication success rates were compared.

Results

The overall CAM-based eradication success rate was 84% (54/64): 62% (13/21) for CAM-resistant strains, and 95% (39/41) for CAM-sensitive strains. When the mutation rate of the 23S rRNA gene was 20% or lower for both positions (2142 and 2143), the eradication success rate was 90% or more. However, when the mutation rate was 20% or higher, the eradication success rate was lower (60%).

Conclusions

The mutation rate of the CAM-resistance gene was related to the success of eradication therapy, as determined via pyrosequencing analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Helicobacter
Helicobacter 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Helicobacter is edited by Professor David Y Graham. The editorial and peer review process is an independent process. Whenever there is a conflict of interest, the editor and editorial board will declare their interests and affiliations. Helicobacter recognises the critical role that has been established for Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma. As new helicobacter species are now regularly being discovered, Helicobacter covers the entire range of helicobacter research, increasing communication among the fields of gastroenterology; microbiology; vaccine development; laboratory animal science.
期刊最新文献
Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate? Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden Helicobacter pylori Management in Africa: A Survey of Diagnostic, Treatment, and Related Resources LCI's Diagnostic Performance for Gastric Cancer: A New Solution to Screening? Nationwide Trends in Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapies in Korea: Impact of Guideline Updates on Treatment Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1