通过分段法评估同步双轴测试方法在超大型风力涡轮机叶片评估中的可行性

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s40684-024-00597-w
Kwangtae Ha, Daeyong Kwon, Cheol Yoo, Kyuhong Kim
{"title":"通过分段法评估同步双轴测试方法在超大型风力涡轮机叶片评估中的可行性","authors":"Kwangtae Ha, Daeyong Kwon, Cheol Yoo, Kyuhong Kim","doi":"10.1007/s40684-024-00597-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper outlines an innovative biaxial segment blade test methodology for large wind turbine rotor blades. Today, as a blade size is getting bigger, not only it is hard to find the test facility incorporating blade over 100 m, but also a blade test time and test cost required for certification according to IEC 6140023 are also increased, which could cause the delay of product entrance to wind energy market. The proposed biaxial segment test method mainly aims at improving the efficiency of the fatigue test because fatigue test takes up more than 70% of total test time and 60% of total test time approximately and is also intended to utilize existing test facilities through the segmentation of a large blade. For the feasibility assessment of the novel methodology, the virtual test model of the fatigue test configuration was constructed including virtual mass element, spring element, damping element, blade beam element, and kinematic lever-arm mechanism. Through the optimization process, it was found out that the proposed test methodology has a significant time saving up to 36% compared to conventional blade test method for 90 m blade test, which is even 17% further saving compared to uniaxial segment test. Also, the proposed methodology could save cost by 17% compared to traditional method. Among categories constituting the total cost calculated from 90 m blade case, electricity cost category related to hydraulic pumps necessary to maintain high forces was increased by 7% while labor and material costs reduced by 3% and 3% respectively compared to traditional test approach. The current study also showed that the biaxial segment test method is even more effective for a supersized wind blade. For the 115 m blade, the cost reduction rate was even higher by 5% than one of 90 m blade in addition to the utilization of the existing test facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":14238,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility Assessment of Simultaneous Biaxial Test Methodology by Segmentation Approach for a Supersized Wind Turbine Blade Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Kwangtae Ha, Daeyong Kwon, Cheol Yoo, Kyuhong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40684-024-00597-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper outlines an innovative biaxial segment blade test methodology for large wind turbine rotor blades. Today, as a blade size is getting bigger, not only it is hard to find the test facility incorporating blade over 100 m, but also a blade test time and test cost required for certification according to IEC 6140023 are also increased, which could cause the delay of product entrance to wind energy market. The proposed biaxial segment test method mainly aims at improving the efficiency of the fatigue test because fatigue test takes up more than 70% of total test time and 60% of total test time approximately and is also intended to utilize existing test facilities through the segmentation of a large blade. For the feasibility assessment of the novel methodology, the virtual test model of the fatigue test configuration was constructed including virtual mass element, spring element, damping element, blade beam element, and kinematic lever-arm mechanism. Through the optimization process, it was found out that the proposed test methodology has a significant time saving up to 36% compared to conventional blade test method for 90 m blade test, which is even 17% further saving compared to uniaxial segment test. Also, the proposed methodology could save cost by 17% compared to traditional method. Among categories constituting the total cost calculated from 90 m blade case, electricity cost category related to hydraulic pumps necessary to maintain high forces was increased by 7% while labor and material costs reduced by 3% and 3% respectively compared to traditional test approach. The current study also showed that the biaxial segment test method is even more effective for a supersized wind blade. For the 115 m blade, the cost reduction rate was even higher by 5% than one of 90 m blade in addition to the utilization of the existing test facility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-024-00597-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-024-00597-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了一种用于大型风力涡轮机转子叶片的创新型双轴分段叶片测试方法。在叶片尺寸越来越大的今天,不仅很难找到适合 100 米以上叶片的测试设备,而且根据 IEC 6140023 进行认证所需的叶片测试时间和测试成本也在增加,这可能会导致产品延迟进入风能市场。由于疲劳测试占总测试时间的 70% 以上,约占总测试时间的 60%,因此提出的双轴分段测试方法主要是为了提高疲劳测试的效率,同时也是为了通过对大型叶片进行分段测试来利用现有的测试设施。为了评估新方法的可行性,我们构建了疲劳试验配置的虚拟试验模型,包括虚拟质量元件、弹簧元件、阻尼元件、叶片梁元件和运动杠杆臂机构。通过优化过程发现,在 90 米叶片试验中,与传统的叶片试验方法相比,所提出的试验方法显著节省了 36% 的时间,与单轴分段试验相比,甚至还节省了 17% 的时间。此外,与传统方法相比,建议的方法还能节省 17% 的成本。在 90 米叶片案例计算的总成本类别中,与维持高压力所需的液压泵相关的电费类别增加了 7%,而与传统测试方法相比,人工和材料成本分别减少了 3% 和 3%。目前的研究还表明,双轴分段测试方法对超大型风电叶片更为有效。对于 115 米长的叶片,除了利用现有测试设施外,成本降低率甚至比 90 米长的叶片高出 5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility Assessment of Simultaneous Biaxial Test Methodology by Segmentation Approach for a Supersized Wind Turbine Blade Evaluation

This paper outlines an innovative biaxial segment blade test methodology for large wind turbine rotor blades. Today, as a blade size is getting bigger, not only it is hard to find the test facility incorporating blade over 100 m, but also a blade test time and test cost required for certification according to IEC 6140023 are also increased, which could cause the delay of product entrance to wind energy market. The proposed biaxial segment test method mainly aims at improving the efficiency of the fatigue test because fatigue test takes up more than 70% of total test time and 60% of total test time approximately and is also intended to utilize existing test facilities through the segmentation of a large blade. For the feasibility assessment of the novel methodology, the virtual test model of the fatigue test configuration was constructed including virtual mass element, spring element, damping element, blade beam element, and kinematic lever-arm mechanism. Through the optimization process, it was found out that the proposed test methodology has a significant time saving up to 36% compared to conventional blade test method for 90 m blade test, which is even 17% further saving compared to uniaxial segment test. Also, the proposed methodology could save cost by 17% compared to traditional method. Among categories constituting the total cost calculated from 90 m blade case, electricity cost category related to hydraulic pumps necessary to maintain high forces was increased by 7% while labor and material costs reduced by 3% and 3% respectively compared to traditional test approach. The current study also showed that the biaxial segment test method is even more effective for a supersized wind blade. For the 115 m blade, the cost reduction rate was even higher by 5% than one of 90 m blade in addition to the utilization of the existing test facility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Green Technology aspects of precision engineering and manufacturing are becoming ever more important in current and future technologies. New knowledge in this field will aid in the advancement of various technologies that are needed to gain industrial competitiveness. To this end IJPEM - Green Technology aims to disseminate relevant developments and applied research works of high quality to the international community through efficient and rapid publication. IJPEM - Green Technology covers novel research contributions in all aspects of "Green" precision engineering and manufacturing.
期刊最新文献
Online Vibration Detection in High-Speed Robotic Milling Process Based on Wavelet Energy Entropy of Acoustic Emission The Abrasion Robotic Solutions: A review Integration of Cu-Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles on High Surface UV-Laser-Induced Graphene for Enhanced Photodegradation, De-icing, and Anti-bacterial Surface Applications Flux Filling Rate Effect on Weld Bead Deposition of Recycled Titanium Chip Tubular Wire Bipolar Current Collectors of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Laminates of Structural Battery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1