带拉力搭接的快速硬化混凝土(RHC)梁的抗弯性能

IF 2.5 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w
Mohamed Hussein El Fakhrany, Amal el-Zamrawi, Wael Ibrahim, Alaa Sherif
{"title":"带拉力搭接的快速硬化混凝土(RHC)梁的抗弯性能","authors":"Mohamed Hussein El Fakhrany,&nbsp;Amal el-Zamrawi,&nbsp;Wael Ibrahim,&nbsp;Alaa Sherif","doi":"10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rapid-hardening concrete (RHC) is a specialized type of concrete that gains strength at an accelerated rate, allowing for faster construction and reduced project timelines. The use of RHC in structural applications, such as in beams subjected to flexural loads, has gained significant attention due to its potential for improving construction efficiency. This study focuses on the flexural performance of RHC beams with tension lap splice, which is considered a common method for joining reinforcement bars in concrete structures.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Several parameters were taken into consideration, such as concrete type, concrete cover, and reinforcement bar diameter. The loading test was performed on sixteen beams to show results of load capacities, moment–displacement response, energy absorption, and ductility. As a result, the flexural performance of RHC beams is compared to that of NC beams.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results indicate that RHC beams require 30 <i>Φ</i> splice length after 3 days of casting, while NC beams require 40 <i>Φ</i> splice length after 28 days. The RHC beam had higher load capacities, ductility, resilience, and toughness than NC beams, by 73%, 41%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. The bar diameter and concrete cover had a significant effect on increasing loads and resilience, while toughness decreased.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":481,"journal":{"name":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural performance of rapid-hardening concrete (RHC) beams with tension lap splice\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Hussein El Fakhrany,&nbsp;Amal el-Zamrawi,&nbsp;Wael Ibrahim,&nbsp;Alaa Sherif\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rapid-hardening concrete (RHC) is a specialized type of concrete that gains strength at an accelerated rate, allowing for faster construction and reduced project timelines. The use of RHC in structural applications, such as in beams subjected to flexural loads, has gained significant attention due to its potential for improving construction efficiency. This study focuses on the flexural performance of RHC beams with tension lap splice, which is considered a common method for joining reinforcement bars in concrete structures.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Several parameters were taken into consideration, such as concrete type, concrete cover, and reinforcement bar diameter. The loading test was performed on sixteen beams to show results of load capacities, moment–displacement response, energy absorption, and ductility. As a result, the flexural performance of RHC beams is compared to that of NC beams.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results indicate that RHC beams require 30 <i>Φ</i> splice length after 3 days of casting, while NC beams require 40 <i>Φ</i> splice length after 28 days. The RHC beam had higher load capacities, ductility, resilience, and toughness than NC beams, by 73%, 41%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. The bar diameter and concrete cover had a significant effect on increasing loads and resilience, while toughness decreased.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-024-00478-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景快速硬化混凝土(RHC)是一种特殊类型的混凝土,它能加速提高强度,从而加快施工速度,缩短项目工期。由于 RHC 具有提高施工效率的潜力,因此它在结构应用(如承受弯曲荷载的梁)中的使用受到了广泛关注。本研究的重点是带有拉伸搭接的 RHC 梁的抗弯性能,拉伸搭接被认为是混凝土结构中连接钢筋的常用方法。对 16 根梁进行了加载试验,结果显示了承载能力、弯矩-位移响应、能量吸收和延展性。结论结果表明,RHC 梁在浇筑 3 天后需要 30 Φ 的拼接长度,而 NC 梁在 28 天后需要 40 Φ 的拼接长度。RHC 梁的承载能力、延展性、回弹性和韧性分别比 NC 梁高 73%、41%、82% 和 88%。钢筋直径和混凝土覆盖层对提高荷载和回弹性有显著影响,而韧性则有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flexural performance of rapid-hardening concrete (RHC) beams with tension lap splice

Background

Rapid-hardening concrete (RHC) is a specialized type of concrete that gains strength at an accelerated rate, allowing for faster construction and reduced project timelines. The use of RHC in structural applications, such as in beams subjected to flexural loads, has gained significant attention due to its potential for improving construction efficiency. This study focuses on the flexural performance of RHC beams with tension lap splice, which is considered a common method for joining reinforcement bars in concrete structures.

Results

Several parameters were taken into consideration, such as concrete type, concrete cover, and reinforcement bar diameter. The loading test was performed on sixteen beams to show results of load capacities, moment–displacement response, energy absorption, and ductility. As a result, the flexural performance of RHC beams is compared to that of NC beams.

Conclusions

Results indicate that RHC beams require 30 Φ splice length after 3 days of casting, while NC beams require 40 Φ splice length after 28 days. The RHC beam had higher load capacities, ductility, resilience, and toughness than NC beams, by 73%, 41%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. The bar diameter and concrete cover had a significant effect on increasing loads and resilience, while toughness decreased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (BJBAS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. This journal welcomes submissions of original research, literature reviews, and editorials in its respected fields of fundamental science, applied science (with a particular focus on the fields of applied nanotechnology and biotechnology), medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, and engineering. The multidisciplinary aspects of the journal encourage global collaboration between researchers in multiple fields and provide cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings.
期刊最新文献
Novel single nucleotide polymorphism G216A of hormone-sensitive lipase gene associated with Awassi sheep reproduction Harnessing nanotechnology for enhanced delivery of erlotinib: a dynamic duo in cancer treatment Exploring flexural performance and abrasion resistance in recycled brick powder-based engineered geopolymer composites Metabolic engineering of terpene metabolism in lavender Evaluating the effect of different diaphragm wall cracking scenarios on seepage and slope stability in Earth dams using experimental and numerical modeling approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1