Lucía Del Río, Jon Ander Zearra, Rafael Mateo, Pablo Ferreras, Jorge Tobajas
{"title":"伊比利亚狼引诱剂和诱饵的探测效果:圈养和放养试验","authors":"Lucía Del Río, Jon Ander Zearra, Rafael Mateo, Pablo Ferreras, Jorge Tobajas","doi":"10.1007/s10344-024-01787-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monitoring large carnivores requires substantial effort, which is why indirect methodologies such as camera trapping with attractants or baits are commonly employed. The Iberian wolf (<i>Canis lupus signatus</i>) is one of the top predators in the Iberian Peninsula, and monitoring its packs is essential to understand its distribution and mitigate conflicts arising from livestock predation. We performed a captivity-based study evaluating the effectiveness of five attractants (beef extract, cadaverine, Fatty Acid Scent (FAS), lynx urine and valerian extract) on wolf detection. To accomplish this objective, Jacobs selectivity index and generalized linear models were employed to assess the attractiveness and induced behaviour of each attractant. Subsequently, the three most effective attractants, combined or not with a bait, were tested in the field and analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. The five attractants tested elicited different behavioural responses in the wolves in captivity, including smelling, rubbing, rolling, marking and licking. Among the captive wolves, cadaverine, FAS and lynx urine emerged as the top three preferred attractants. In the field tests with these three attractants cadaverine remained the most preferred option. The inclusion of bait did not have any significant effect on the wolf’s visitation rates. Our results show that employing species-specific attractants can significantly improve the efficiency of carnivore surveys conducted in the field. Specifically, cadaverine was the most effective attractant for wild Iberian wolves. Consequently, the careful selection of an appropriate attractant becomes crucial to attain the precise objectives of the study, such as camera trapping, bait deployment or DNA sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":51044,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of attractants and bait for Iberian wolf detection: captivity-based and free-ranging trials\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Del Río, Jon Ander Zearra, Rafael Mateo, Pablo Ferreras, Jorge Tobajas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10344-024-01787-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Monitoring large carnivores requires substantial effort, which is why indirect methodologies such as camera trapping with attractants or baits are commonly employed. The Iberian wolf (<i>Canis lupus signatus</i>) is one of the top predators in the Iberian Peninsula, and monitoring its packs is essential to understand its distribution and mitigate conflicts arising from livestock predation. We performed a captivity-based study evaluating the effectiveness of five attractants (beef extract, cadaverine, Fatty Acid Scent (FAS), lynx urine and valerian extract) on wolf detection. To accomplish this objective, Jacobs selectivity index and generalized linear models were employed to assess the attractiveness and induced behaviour of each attractant. Subsequently, the three most effective attractants, combined or not with a bait, were tested in the field and analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. The five attractants tested elicited different behavioural responses in the wolves in captivity, including smelling, rubbing, rolling, marking and licking. Among the captive wolves, cadaverine, FAS and lynx urine emerged as the top three preferred attractants. In the field tests with these three attractants cadaverine remained the most preferred option. The inclusion of bait did not have any significant effect on the wolf’s visitation rates. Our results show that employing species-specific attractants can significantly improve the efficiency of carnivore surveys conducted in the field. Specifically, cadaverine was the most effective attractant for wild Iberian wolves. Consequently, the careful selection of an appropriate attractant becomes crucial to attain the precise objectives of the study, such as camera trapping, bait deployment or DNA sampling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Wildlife Research\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Wildlife Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01787-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01787-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
监测大型食肉动物需要投入大量精力,因此通常采用间接方法,如使用引诱剂或诱饵进行相机诱捕。伊比利亚狼(Canis lupus signatus)是伊比利亚半岛最主要的食肉动物之一,对其狼群进行监测对于了解其分布情况和缓解捕食牲畜引起的冲突至关重要。我们进行了一项圈养研究,评估了五种引诱剂(牛肉提取物、尸碱、脂肪酸气味(FAS)、猞猁尿液和缬草提取物)对狼群探测的有效性。为了实现这一目标,我们采用了雅各布选择性指数和广义线性模型来评估每种引诱剂的吸引力和诱导行为。随后,在野外测试了三种最有效的引诱剂,并使用广义线性混合模型对其进行了分析。测试的五种引诱剂在圈养狼身上引起了不同的行为反应,包括嗅闻、摩擦、滚动、标记和舔食。在人工饲养的狼群中,尸毒、FAS 和猞猁尿是它们最喜欢的三种引诱剂。在使用这三种引诱剂进行的野外测试中,尸体碱仍然是最受欢迎的选择。加入诱饵对狼的光顾率没有任何明显影响。我们的研究结果表明,使用针对特定物种的引诱剂可以大大提高野外食肉动物调查的效率。具体来说,尸毒是对伊比利亚野狼最有效的引诱剂。因此,仔细选择合适的引诱剂对于实现相机诱捕、诱饵投放或 DNA 采样等精确的研究目标至关重要。
Effectiveness of attractants and bait for Iberian wolf detection: captivity-based and free-ranging trials
Monitoring large carnivores requires substantial effort, which is why indirect methodologies such as camera trapping with attractants or baits are commonly employed. The Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus) is one of the top predators in the Iberian Peninsula, and monitoring its packs is essential to understand its distribution and mitigate conflicts arising from livestock predation. We performed a captivity-based study evaluating the effectiveness of five attractants (beef extract, cadaverine, Fatty Acid Scent (FAS), lynx urine and valerian extract) on wolf detection. To accomplish this objective, Jacobs selectivity index and generalized linear models were employed to assess the attractiveness and induced behaviour of each attractant. Subsequently, the three most effective attractants, combined or not with a bait, were tested in the field and analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. The five attractants tested elicited different behavioural responses in the wolves in captivity, including smelling, rubbing, rolling, marking and licking. Among the captive wolves, cadaverine, FAS and lynx urine emerged as the top three preferred attractants. In the field tests with these three attractants cadaverine remained the most preferred option. The inclusion of bait did not have any significant effect on the wolf’s visitation rates. Our results show that employing species-specific attractants can significantly improve the efficiency of carnivore surveys conducted in the field. Specifically, cadaverine was the most effective attractant for wild Iberian wolves. Consequently, the careful selection of an appropriate attractant becomes crucial to attain the precise objectives of the study, such as camera trapping, bait deployment or DNA sampling.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Wildlife Research focuses on all aspects of wildlife biology. Main areas are: applied wildlife ecology; diseases affecting wildlife population dynamics, conservation, economy or public health; ecotoxicology; management for conservation, hunting or pest control; population genetics; and the sustainable use of wildlife as a natural resource. Contributions to socio-cultural aspects of human-wildlife relationships and to the history and sociology of hunting will also be considered.