在 COVID-19 大流行期间对新移民家庭的儿童安全报告、服务和儿童福利干预:对安大略省儿童福利工作者的调查。

Daniel Kikulwe , Derrick Ssewanyana , Sarah Maiter
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间对新移民家庭的儿童安全报告、服务和儿童福利干预:对安大略省儿童福利工作者的调查。","authors":"Daniel Kikulwe ,&nbsp;Derrick Ssewanyana ,&nbsp;Sarah Maiter","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Newcomer families with child welfare involvement face complex COVID-19 related challenges that are still less understood within the Canadian context.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored views on the changes in child safety reporting and interventions with newcomer families during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>and Setting: Participants were 63 child welfare workers from Children's Aid Societies across Ontario, Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross tabulations with Fisher exact tests, the analysis draws on survey data from the second wave of the pandemic to test for significance of differences in areas of child safety reporting, interventions with newcomer families, and available supports across urban and urban/rural settings.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Parents' emotional instability and substance use (86%), domestic/adult conflict (85.6%), and child emotional harm (66.3%) were the top child safety issues with most increased reporting during the pandemic. Except for domestic/adult conflict, there were no differences in the rating of the six identified areas of child abuse across newcomer/racialized caseloads in different geographical settings. Increasingly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, workers were intervening with newcomer families by ‘connecting them with community agencies or services’ (51.8%), and ‘reaching out to extended family and other community members to support parents’ (44.6%). Mental health supports (68.4%), family access (66.7%), and childcare (65.9%) were the least accessible services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A closer examination of the reported child safety incidents shows that child emotional harm was on the rise and that child sexual and physical abuse were underreported. Unidentified cases of child abuse during the pandemic posed barriers to help-seeking and resulted in limited or no supports for victims.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000044/pdfft?md5=ac68122385463f02425d3d5a2c5c7245&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000044-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child safety reporting, services, and child welfare interventions with newcomer families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of ontario child welfare workers.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Kikulwe ,&nbsp;Derrick Ssewanyana ,&nbsp;Sarah Maiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Newcomer families with child welfare involvement face complex COVID-19 related challenges that are still less understood within the Canadian context.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored views on the changes in child safety reporting and interventions with newcomer families during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>and Setting: Participants were 63 child welfare workers from Children's Aid Societies across Ontario, Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross tabulations with Fisher exact tests, the analysis draws on survey data from the second wave of the pandemic to test for significance of differences in areas of child safety reporting, interventions with newcomer families, and available supports across urban and urban/rural settings.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Parents' emotional instability and substance use (86%), domestic/adult conflict (85.6%), and child emotional harm (66.3%) were the top child safety issues with most increased reporting during the pandemic. Except for domestic/adult conflict, there were no differences in the rating of the six identified areas of child abuse across newcomer/racialized caseloads in different geographical settings. Increasingly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, workers were intervening with newcomer families by ‘connecting them with community agencies or services’ (51.8%), and ‘reaching out to extended family and other community members to support parents’ (44.6%). Mental health supports (68.4%), family access (66.7%), and childcare (65.9%) were the least accessible services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A closer examination of the reported child safety incidents shows that child emotional harm was on the rise and that child sexual and physical abuse were underreported. Unidentified cases of child abuse during the pandemic posed barriers to help-seeking and resulted in limited or no supports for victims.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Protection and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000044/pdfft?md5=ac68122385463f02425d3d5a2c5c7245&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000044-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Protection and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景涉及儿童福利的新移民家庭面临着与 COVID-19 相关的复杂挑战,而在加拿大,人们对这些挑战的了解仍然较少。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,新移民家庭在儿童安全报告和干预措施方面的变化:方法采用交叉表法和费舍尔精确检验法,利用大流行病第二波的调查数据进行分析,检验城市和城乡环境在儿童安全报告、对新移民家庭的干预以及可用支持等方面的差异是否显著。研究结果父母情绪不稳定和使用药物(86%)、家庭/成人冲突(85.6%)和儿童情绪伤害(66.3%)是大流行期间报告最多的儿童安全问题。除家庭/成人冲突外,不同地区的新移民/种族化案例群对已确定的六个虐待儿童领域的评价没有差异。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,越来越多的工作者通过 "为新移民家庭联系社区机构或服务"(51.8%)和 "联系大家庭和其他社区成员为父母提供支持"(44.6%)来干预新移民家庭。心理健康支持(68.4%)、家庭访问(66.7%)和儿童保育(65.9%)是最不易获得的服务。在大流行病期间,未被发现的虐待儿童案件对寻求帮助造成了障碍,导致对受害者的支持有限或根本没有支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Child safety reporting, services, and child welfare interventions with newcomer families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of ontario child welfare workers.

Background

Newcomer families with child welfare involvement face complex COVID-19 related challenges that are still less understood within the Canadian context.

Objective

This study explored views on the changes in child safety reporting and interventions with newcomer families during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Participants

and Setting: Participants were 63 child welfare workers from Children's Aid Societies across Ontario, Canada.

Methods

Using cross tabulations with Fisher exact tests, the analysis draws on survey data from the second wave of the pandemic to test for significance of differences in areas of child safety reporting, interventions with newcomer families, and available supports across urban and urban/rural settings.

Findings

Parents' emotional instability and substance use (86%), domestic/adult conflict (85.6%), and child emotional harm (66.3%) were the top child safety issues with most increased reporting during the pandemic. Except for domestic/adult conflict, there were no differences in the rating of the six identified areas of child abuse across newcomer/racialized caseloads in different geographical settings. Increasingly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, workers were intervening with newcomer families by ‘connecting them with community agencies or services’ (51.8%), and ‘reaching out to extended family and other community members to support parents’ (44.6%). Mental health supports (68.4%), family access (66.7%), and childcare (65.9%) were the least accessible services.

Conclusion

A closer examination of the reported child safety incidents shows that child emotional harm was on the rise and that child sexual and physical abuse were underreported. Unidentified cases of child abuse during the pandemic posed barriers to help-seeking and resulted in limited or no supports for victims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Population attributable fractions of adolescent health and well-being outcomes associated with adverse childhood experiences in a provincially representative sample in Ontario, Canada Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration Bidirectional associations between well-being at school, psychosocial problems and PTSS in children exposed to family violence Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings Silent group sandplay activates healing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1