测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度--应使用哪种问卷?通俗易懂的出版物摘要。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurodegenerative disease management Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.2217/nmt-2023-0034
Paul Kamudoni, Jeffrey Johns, Karon F Cook, Rana Salem, Sam Salek, Jana Raab, Rod Middleton, Christian Henke, Dagmar Amtmann
{"title":"测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度--应使用哪种问卷?通俗易懂的出版物摘要。","authors":"Paul Kamudoni, Jeffrey Johns, Karon F Cook, Rana Salem, Sam Salek, Jana Raab, Rod Middleton, Christian Henke, Dagmar Amtmann","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2023-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What is this summary about?: </strong>This summary explains the findings of a recent study that compared different questionnaires used by doctors to measure levels of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to find out which questionnaire doctors should use to measure fatigue in people with MS in the future. Fatigue, which can be described as the overwhelming feeling of tiredness or exhaustion, is a very common symptom of MS. For the majority of people with MS, fatigue is one of the worst symptoms of MS, so it is essential that doctors can measure it accurately. Currently, people with MS are asked to complete questionnaires so that their care team can see the effect of fatigue on their day-to-day lives. There are many questionnaires that are used to measure fatigue in people with MS. It would be valuable to come to an agreement, based on evidence from research like this study, on which questionnaire is the most appropriate for measuring fatigue in both research and healthcare settings. This study compared a questionnaire called the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> Fatigue (MS) 8a, referred to throughout this summary as the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form, with two of the most commonly used questionnaires: the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The questionnaires were compared to see which one should be recommended to doctors for measuring fatigue in people with MS.</p><p><strong>What are the key takeaways?: </strong>It was found that while all three questionnaires were good, the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire was better than the other two questionnaires at showing differences in levels of fatigue between people with MS. The PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form was also found to be better than the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at showing changes in the person with MS's level of fatigue. The PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire may help people with MS to better communicate challenges with their fatigue to their doctors.</p><p><strong>What was the main conclusion reported by the researchers?: </strong>The study suggests that the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire is a helpful tool for doctors and people with MS to measure fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11244694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Kamudoni, Jeffrey Johns, Karon F Cook, Rana Salem, Sam Salek, Jana Raab, Rod Middleton, Christian Henke, Dagmar Amtmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/nmt-2023-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>What is this summary about?: </strong>This summary explains the findings of a recent study that compared different questionnaires used by doctors to measure levels of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to find out which questionnaire doctors should use to measure fatigue in people with MS in the future. Fatigue, which can be described as the overwhelming feeling of tiredness or exhaustion, is a very common symptom of MS. For the majority of people with MS, fatigue is one of the worst symptoms of MS, so it is essential that doctors can measure it accurately. Currently, people with MS are asked to complete questionnaires so that their care team can see the effect of fatigue on their day-to-day lives. There are many questionnaires that are used to measure fatigue in people with MS. It would be valuable to come to an agreement, based on evidence from research like this study, on which questionnaire is the most appropriate for measuring fatigue in both research and healthcare settings. This study compared a questionnaire called the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> Fatigue (MS) 8a, referred to throughout this summary as the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form, with two of the most commonly used questionnaires: the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The questionnaires were compared to see which one should be recommended to doctors for measuring fatigue in people with MS.</p><p><strong>What are the key takeaways?: </strong>It was found that while all three questionnaires were good, the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire was better than the other two questionnaires at showing differences in levels of fatigue between people with MS. The PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form was also found to be better than the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at showing changes in the person with MS's level of fatigue. The PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire may help people with MS to better communicate challenges with their fatigue to their doctors.</p><p><strong>What was the main conclusion reported by the researchers?: </strong>The study suggests that the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire is a helpful tool for doctors and people with MS to measure fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11244694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2023-0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2023-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本摘要说明了近期一项研究的结果,该研究比较了医生用于测量多发性硬化症(MS)患者疲劳程度的不同问卷。这项研究的目的是找出医生今后应该使用哪种问卷来测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度。疲劳可以被描述为一种难以承受的疲倦或精疲力竭的感觉,是多发性硬化症的一种非常常见的症状。对于大多数多发性硬化症患者来说,疲劳是多发性硬化症最严重的症状之一,因此医生必须对其进行准确测量。目前,多发性硬化症患者需要填写调查问卷,以便护理团队了解疲劳对其日常生活的影响。用于测量多发性硬化症患者疲劳程度的问卷有很多。根据本研究等研究的证据,就哪种问卷最适合在研究和医疗环境中测量疲劳达成一致是非常有价值的。本研究将 PROMIS® 疲劳(MS)8a(在本摘要中称为 PROMIS® MS 疲劳简表)问卷与两种最常用的问卷:疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)进行了比较。对这两种问卷进行了比较,以确定应向医生推荐哪一种问卷来测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度:研究发现,虽然这三种问卷都不错,但在显示多发性硬化症患者疲劳程度差异方面,PROMIS® 多发性硬化症疲劳简表问卷优于其他两种问卷。在显示多发性硬化症患者疲劳程度的变化方面,PROMIS® 多发性硬化症疲劳简表也优于疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)。PROMIS®多发性硬化症疲劳简表问卷可以帮助多发性硬化症患者更好地向医生表达他们在疲劳方面遇到的挑战:研究表明,PROMIS® 多发性硬化症疲劳简表问卷是医生和多发性硬化症患者测量疲劳的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication.

What is this summary about?: This summary explains the findings of a recent study that compared different questionnaires used by doctors to measure levels of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to find out which questionnaire doctors should use to measure fatigue in people with MS in the future. Fatigue, which can be described as the overwhelming feeling of tiredness or exhaustion, is a very common symptom of MS. For the majority of people with MS, fatigue is one of the worst symptoms of MS, so it is essential that doctors can measure it accurately. Currently, people with MS are asked to complete questionnaires so that their care team can see the effect of fatigue on their day-to-day lives. There are many questionnaires that are used to measure fatigue in people with MS. It would be valuable to come to an agreement, based on evidence from research like this study, on which questionnaire is the most appropriate for measuring fatigue in both research and healthcare settings. This study compared a questionnaire called the PROMIS® Fatigue (MS) 8a, referred to throughout this summary as the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form, with two of the most commonly used questionnaires: the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The questionnaires were compared to see which one should be recommended to doctors for measuring fatigue in people with MS.

What are the key takeaways?: It was found that while all three questionnaires were good, the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire was better than the other two questionnaires at showing differences in levels of fatigue between people with MS. The PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form was also found to be better than the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at showing changes in the person with MS's level of fatigue. The PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire may help people with MS to better communicate challenges with their fatigue to their doctors.

What was the main conclusion reported by the researchers?: The study suggests that the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire is a helpful tool for doctors and people with MS to measure fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and their radiological, biological and clinical characteristics: a plain language summary Effects and mechanisms of computerized cognitive training in Huntington's disease: protocol for a pilot study Medicinal cannabis in neurodegenerative disorders: an open label, dose finding, safety and efficacy study. Glycine and clozapine: potential relevance for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Patient-reported benefits from nabiximols treatment in multiple sclerosis-related spasticity exceed conventional measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1