精神病早期干预服务中基层/专科医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-26 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0558
Michelle Rickett, Tom Kingstone, Veenu Gupta, David Shiers, Paul French, Belinda Lennox, Mike Crawford, Ed Penington, Anna Hedges, Jo Ward, Ryan Williams, Paul A Bateman, Carolyn A Chew-Graham
{"title":"精神病早期干预服务中基层/专科医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。","authors":"Michelle Rickett, Tom Kingstone, Veenu Gupta, David Shiers, Paul French, Belinda Lennox, Mike Crawford, Ed Penington, Anna Hedges, Jo Ward, Ryan Williams, Paul A Bateman, Carolyn A Chew-Graham","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with new psychotic symptoms may be managed in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service. They may be discharged back to primary care at the end of their time in an EIP service.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the role of primary care in supporting people with psychosis in an EIP service.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study, within a programme of work to explore the optimum duration of management in an EIP service in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were carried out with people in EIP services, carers, GPs, and EIP practitioners between September 2022 and September 2023. Data collection continued until information power was achieved. Data were thematically analysed using principles of constant comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While most service users and carers described their experiences of EIP services as positive, there are issues around access to and discharge from the services. GPs reported difficulties in referring people into EIP services, having little contact with people who are supported by EIP services, and not being included in planning discharge from EIP services to primary care. Service users and carers described challenges at the point of discharge from EIP services to primary care, associated with feelings of abandonment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that GPs should have a role in the support of people in EIP services (in particular, monitoring and managing physical health) and their carers. Inclusion of GPs in managing discharge from EIP services is vital. We suggest that a joint consultation with the service user, their carer (if they wish), along with the EIP care coordinator and GP would make this transition smoother.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e709-e716"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaboration across the primary and specialist care interface in Early Intervention in Psychosis services: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Rickett, Tom Kingstone, Veenu Gupta, David Shiers, Paul French, Belinda Lennox, Mike Crawford, Ed Penington, Anna Hedges, Jo Ward, Ryan Williams, Paul A Bateman, Carolyn A Chew-Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with new psychotic symptoms may be managed in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service. They may be discharged back to primary care at the end of their time in an EIP service.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the role of primary care in supporting people with psychosis in an EIP service.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study, within a programme of work to explore the optimum duration of management in an EIP service in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were carried out with people in EIP services, carers, GPs, and EIP practitioners between September 2022 and September 2023. Data collection continued until information power was achieved. Data were thematically analysed using principles of constant comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While most service users and carers described their experiences of EIP services as positive, there are issues around access to and discharge from the services. GPs reported difficulties in referring people into EIP services, having little contact with people who are supported by EIP services, and not being included in planning discharge from EIP services to primary care. Service users and carers described challenges at the point of discharge from EIP services to primary care, associated with feelings of abandonment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that GPs should have a role in the support of people in EIP services (in particular, monitoring and managing physical health) and their carers. Inclusion of GPs in managing discharge from EIP services is vital. We suggest that a joint consultation with the service user, their carer (if they wish), along with the EIP care coordinator and GP would make this transition smoother.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e709-e716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350604/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0558\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景新出现精神病症状的患者可能会在思觉失调早期干预服务(EIP)中接受治疗。在 EIP 服务结束后,他们可能会被送回基层医疗机构。目的 探讨初级医疗在支持 EIP 服务中的精神病患者方面所扮演的角色。设计和设置 定性研究,在一项探索 EIP 服务最佳管理期限的工作计划中进行。方法 对接受 EIP 服务的患者、照护者、全科医生 (GP) 和 EIP 从业人员进行半结构式访谈。结果 全科医生报告称,他们很难将患者转介到 EIP 服务机构,与接受 EIP 服务支持的患者接触很少,也不参与规划从 EIP 服务机构到初级保健机构的出院事宜。结论 本研究表明,全科医生应在支持 EIP 服务对象(尤其是监测和管理身体健康)及其照护者方面发挥作用。让全科医生参与 EIP 服务的出院管理至关重要。我们建议,与服务使用者、其照顾者(如果他们愿意)以及 EIP 护理协调员和全科医生共同协商,将使这一过渡更加顺利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaboration across the primary and specialist care interface in Early Intervention in Psychosis services: a qualitative study.

Background: People with new psychotic symptoms may be managed in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service. They may be discharged back to primary care at the end of their time in an EIP service.

Aim: To explore the role of primary care in supporting people with psychosis in an EIP service.

Design and setting: Qualitative study, within a programme of work to explore the optimum duration of management in an EIP service in England.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with people in EIP services, carers, GPs, and EIP practitioners between September 2022 and September 2023. Data collection continued until information power was achieved. Data were thematically analysed using principles of constant comparison.

Results: While most service users and carers described their experiences of EIP services as positive, there are issues around access to and discharge from the services. GPs reported difficulties in referring people into EIP services, having little contact with people who are supported by EIP services, and not being included in planning discharge from EIP services to primary care. Service users and carers described challenges at the point of discharge from EIP services to primary care, associated with feelings of abandonment.

Conclusion: This study suggests that GPs should have a role in the support of people in EIP services (in particular, monitoring and managing physical health) and their carers. Inclusion of GPs in managing discharge from EIP services is vital. We suggest that a joint consultation with the service user, their carer (if they wish), along with the EIP care coordinator and GP would make this transition smoother.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme uptake, patient satisfaction, and QOF achievement: an ecological study from 2020-2023. Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020). Improving personal continuity in general practice: a focus group study. The association between cancer risk assessment tool use and GP consultation duration: an observational study. Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1